Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Guys,

I meant to reply to this last night, but was out at a gig (what do you mean I can't have a life?!) so had to leave it until now.

A Windows 10 forum will come (hopefully sooner than later) and this also gives us the opportunity to roll the Vista forum up into the main Windows forum.

One idea I have had is to possibly create a Windows 10 EduGeek Working Group. This would be staffed by volunteers, taken from you guys who are going to be on the Windows Preview Scheme.

Now, I know from past experiance that early betas have almost zero features to talk of bar Microsoft getting to core code nailed down, but as time rolls on you can keep us all informed on new changes as how they would affect systems in schools etc. as well as providing working solutions to issues created by the new features as they are introduuced.

If you think this is a good idea and want to be involved please let me know below, but please be aware that this may get quite intensive the more mature the betas become and the demand for answers increases. You will be our eyes, ears and main problem solvers.

So, if you think you are up to it, please take a step forwards.

Posted (edited)

Waiting to see if there's an Office 365 login option, need that badly as setting up Windows tablets at the moment is painful. Heard it mentioned but haven't got the patience to sit through a 40 minute video to find out :p

 

Hurry up and release that Tech Preview Microsoft!

Edited by gshaw
Posted

I'd be up for the Win10 Working Group too!

I'll probably get the Tech Preview a few days after its released to miss the mass download rush!

Posted
I'd be up for the Win10 Working Group too!

I'll probably get the Tech Preview a few days after its released to miss the mass download rush!

 

ditto might put iit on my old laptop (just got my current one the way i like it and no way am i putting beat softrware on my surface)

Posted (edited)

As for the Win10 forum itself - I did wonder last night whether we should start having sub forums

 

Eg:

 

Windows Clients

| ----- Windows 7

| ----- Windows 8 / 8.1

| ----- Windows 10

 

Windows Servers

| ----- Windows 2000 / 2003

| ----- Windows 2008 / 208 R2

| ----- Windows 2012 / 2012 R2

| ----- Windows Server "10"

 

 

??

Edited by Gatt
Posted
I think them unifying the store is one of the best things they could have done, to be perfectly honest. What's worrying about it for you?

 

Smacks of Big Brother to me, but then it's made Apple hugely successful and nowadays the great unwashed even complain if there isn't an app store.

 

I'll still be downloading the preview (probably tomorrow as it is allegedly 1900h today and I'll be watching Denzel Washington doing some equalizing tonight). I'd be up for the WG, too.

Posted
I'd be up for part of the working group, I'm going to be quite keen to make an early(ish) dive into windows 10 here, so i'll no doubt be playing around quite a lot with the betas.
Posted
Hi Guys,

I meant to reply to this last night, but was out at a gig (what do you mean I can't have a life?!) so had to leave it until now.

A Windows 10 forum will come (hopefully sooner than later) and this also gives us the opportunity to roll the Vista forum up into the main Windows forum.

One idea I have had is to possibly create a Windows 10 EduGeek Working Group. This would be staffed by volunteers, taken from you guys who are going to be on the Windows Preview Scheme.

Now, I know from past experiance that early betas have almost zero features to talk of bar Microsoft getting to core code nailed down, but as time rolls on you can keep us all informed on new changes as how they would affect systems in schools etc. as well as providing working solutions to issues created by the new features as they are introduuced.

If you think this is a good idea and want to be involved please let me know below, but please be aware that this may get quite intensive the more mature the betas become and the demand for answers increases. You will be our eyes, ears and main problem solvers.

So, if you think you are up to it, please take a step forwards.

 

Well up for that.

Posted
The Windows Insider Program sounds interesting - but do I want to move that fast? Might sign up to get a copy on a laptop. Might even think of making it the main OS on my office machine. If I do then I'd be up for the Edugeek Working Group - but whole school roll out? Not sure I'm going to be as hot on it as I was with Windows 7, 7's gonna hang in here a while I think. Server side - I'm even more conservative about upgrades. I've got some 2003 servers I really should get up to at least R2, if not 2008!
Posted
Smacks of Big Brother to me, but then it's made Apple hugely successful and nowadays the great unwashed even complain if there isn't an app store.

 

I'll still be downloading the preview (probably tomorrow as it is allegedly 1900h today and I'll be watching Denzel Washington doing some equalizing tonight). I'd be up for the WG, too.

 

Having one store across the Windows platform is Big Brother to you? I've never heard that one before...

 

All I can see is that it makes developing apps for Windows alot easier, it makes having multiple Windows devices alot easier to use and is generally a big plus for the store.

Posted (edited)
As for the Win10 forum itself - I did wonder last night whether we should start having sub forums

 

Eg:

 

Windows Clients

| ----- Windows 7

| ----- Windows 8 / 8.1

| ----- Windows 10

 

Windows Servers

| ----- Windows 2000 / 2003

| ----- Windows 2008 / 208 R2

| ----- Windows 2012 / 2012 R2

| ----- Windows Server "10"

 

 

??

 

With our pending move to a new platform I think that such a decision could possibly wait. The problem with sub-forums is that people (especially for new members or those not familier with large forums) either can see where they are or post in the first Windows forum they see (you wouldn't belive just how many posts go into 'Windows' (the legacy Windows platform forum) when they are asking about Win 7/8 and server versions.

'In-your-face' tends to work better for accessibility purposes I think.

Edited by Dos_Box
Posted
Having one store across the Windows platform is Big Brother to you? I've never heard that one before...

 

All I can see is that it makes developing apps for Windows alot easier, it makes having multiple Windows devices alot easier to use and is generally a big plus for the store more attractive for enterprises and therefore more profitable for microsoft.

 

FTFY...

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2003 servers still?! Definitely time to upgrade. 2012 R2 is your best choice IMO - it is much faster than earlier versions.

 

Don't worry, it's a mixed boat and a lazy sysadmin. License wise (they're all VM's) I could get every server upto 2012 if I wanted. It's the fear of breaking something. Our DC's are 2012 though, got to give me some kudos for that ;)

Posted

I was having a bit of a downer the other day, one of those 'i'm not really sure I like the way that IT is going at the moment, perhaps I should go back to AV engineering' days... And now they've announced windows 10 and i'm actually quite excited again.

 

I'm still not sure if i'm excited for windows 10 in intself or that it represents being able to sack off the virtually unmanageable windows 8x OS.

 

Either way, i'm quite excited about the future of MS computing for the first time in about 5 years!

Posted

Still pushing at work to get them to upgrade our 9 2008 R2 DCs to 2012 R2

Can't do that until they give the OK to change the Functional Levels from 2003 to 008 R2!

 

**sigh**

Posted
Having one store across the Windows platform is Big Brother to you? I've never heard that one before...

 

All I can see is that it makes developing apps for Windows alot easier, it makes having multiple Windows devices alot easier to use and is generally a big plus for the store.

 

I love the idea of being able to use the same app on a phone as on a PC. I don't love the way that Apple's success with their app store is pushing everyone towards the model of "get it from us or don't get it at all". I wouldn't at all be surprised if a few years later down that route some sort of subscription is needed just to access the store. (Hmmm... maybe I shouldn't say that - THEY might get ideas :tinfoil3:)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
I love the idea of being able to use the same app on a phone as on a PC.

 

The only thing about the concept that worries me is if developers will create lite versions of apps for phone/rt use, leaving you wondering where the features you wanted went, or whether the demands on phone processing will increase making windows phones sluggish trying to run desktop apps? Or even - shock horror, developers will actually prevent their apps from getting lardy by careful coding!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...