Jump to content
EduGeek EdSec 2026 is Go! 27th Oct in Derby! Join us for a day of EdTech security focused talks, networking, and an evening social ×

sukh

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,161

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by sukh

  1. sukh
    What are you using here Google Or Exchange, not clear.
  2. sukh
    Can't you use Send-As permission?
  3. sukh
    1. First of all, check the even logs for any errors or warning. 2. Use repadmin /showreps to see what replication issues it's reporting, chances are it will find something. 3. I assume Exch is working as it should?
  4. sukh
    I would think about your Exch design in you need HA/FT.
  5. sukh
    If the schema has already been updated you don't need to extend again.
  6. sukh
    If you're going to use WNLB for the CAS servers, then you can't have the mbx role on the same server, therefore will need seperate servers for your DAG nodes. Create a CAS Array, then decide of you want to use a WNLB or a HLB.
  7. sukh
    Most likey blocked or filtered out. I assume the MX records go to icritical which then screens and forwards onto Exch, if Exch doesn't even receive them (check message tracking), then the issue is not with Exch, contact icrtical and ask tehm to check.
  8. sukh
    What's in the Outbox? Tried to recreate the OST?
  9. sukh
    You can move the accounts in the parent domain and users can continue to use email without issues. If you can, go for Exch 2010. If installing into the same AD forest, then you can simply move the mailboxes across from 2003>2010.
  10. sukh
    For Exchange I would use a dedicated server (Physical or virtual). Depending on the HA/DR number of users etc will determine the number of servers you need and of course the speco fhte physcial/virtual services.
  11. sukh
    Check and try and disable in the registry too - How to disable IP version 6 (IPv6) or its specific components in Windows 7, in Windows Vista, in Windows Server 2008 R2, and in Windows Server 2008
  12. sukh
    For simplicity, get a 3rd part cert otherwsie end users will get cert prompts. If you do get a 3rd part cert, then you simply assign this to the services you want, i.e IIS, SMTP, IMAP4 etc.. Get the name you want in the cert, make sure to get your common name correct and that's just about it.
  13. sukh
    You can, OWA just uses IIS, so you can use a 3rd party cert for simplcity.
  14. sukh
    Should work fine without issue if planned correctly, use the EDA to help you - Exchange Server 2010: Exchange 2010 Help
  15. sukh
    What if you give permission at the folder level, i.e Inbox, then get the user to ope the Inbox, remove full mailbox permission, and grant send-as.
  16. sukh
    You should use the move request to do this if you have 2003 & 2010 in the same Org. Move Mailboxes from Exchange 2003 Servers to Exchange 2010 Servers: Exchange 2010 Help
  17. sukh
    That's an issue you have then, dont think Exmerge is that smart, you can try keywords and specify the extension and test against one mailbox 1st.
  18. sukh
    So, you require both send-as and full mailbox permission? Is Exch authorative for both domains?
  19. sukh
    Redirect will work, as mentioned by above, but you will have to play around if you specifically want only the signature to be available.
  20. sukh
    Well the choice is your depending on your budget - Microsoft Exchange 2010 Load Balancer Deployment
  21. sukh
    I just get an email from the MSFT through the account manager, but RSS is as good.
  22. sukh
    You can use exmerge, if you have a subject but I dont think you can use a extension from what I remember, fire up Exmerge and have a look at the options.
  23. sukh
    Sorry, they wont sync, olk signatures are local and can be more complex to a simple siganture set say in owa.
  24. sukh
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/05/29/released-update-rollup-3-for-exchange-2010-service-pack-2.aspx
  25. sukh
    Using cache mode?
×
×
  • Create New...