SSFC Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 Hi, we are considering a new firewall, web filter and email filter and these two vendors have so far come out on top. I was hoping to get some users of these systems to give me their views on them and if anyone has experience of both let me know which one you prefer and why. At the moment I see the main differences been SonicWall can throttle bandwidth based on application e.g. video streaming while SmoothWall can only do this on individual URLs. For the email side of things the mail is scanned on the SmoothWall hardware internally while the SonicWall system send the mail to be cleaned in the cloud. Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks
john Posted March 2, 2011 Posted March 2, 2011 *thread moved to the Internet / Filtering / Firewall forum as its more appropriate here* I cannot comment on the Sonicwall, but for Smoothwall I can say that for us its a winner, support is excellent, product range and developments are also great and have been great over the last 3 years as a customer at 2 schools. You mention about bandwidth limiting, I am sure Tom or Rob from Smoothwall can comment but if its not possible to do it by type it is probably something they are looking at for a future development / can look at implementing in the future. The filtering is excellent, never had any issues with it, they always seem quick to pickup new proxies and inappropriate sites, the flash filter is still a great tool as is the HTTPS interception it does, they are as far as I know the only firm out there that can do that (apologies if I am incorrect on that) and with SSL certificates being so cheap now some proxies are using real ones to get around filtering systems as most cannot filter the HTTPS traffic. Well worth the money and your time to use it 3
RTFM Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 Second what John said, Smoothwall is brilliant. You have a couple of options with a Smoothwall solution as well, you can seperate out the filter and the firewall (get a UTM-300 and an SWG-1200 as we have) or get a UTM-1000 which is both in one. The only thing i'd say about having 1x UTM-1000 is your putting everything through 1 piece of hardware and IF it went pop (not saying it would, but if...) then your doubley buggered (as well as the potential volume of traffic all going through one piece of hardware, so its doing a lot of work). Of course you could get 2x UTM-1000 and replicate between the 2 (which i believe I was told is supported at a training day we went to in Leeds) but I could be wrong, it's down to what your happiest with and budget I suppose.... Smoothwall support is second to none, they are knowledgable and willing to help whatever the issue (not something you can say about all companies support teams!!). It's also used by an awful lot of edugeekers, which I always find to be a good reference point! 3
robknowles Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 Hello, Here, we have both. We use the Smoothwall as a proxy/filtering server and then we we use the SonicWall has a firewall that sits between the SmoothWall and the Internet. Never had any problems with either and for us both offer all the functionality that we needed of each product. Thanks, Rob 3
Stuart_C Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 I agree with most of the comments aboeve however I will say I went with another vendor for my E-mail filter. I had a few issues with the smoothwall and found another product to be more user-friendly. Or at least less work for me 3
MYK-IT Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 We too are currently looking at the SmoothWall UTM-1000 Appliance, but 2 of them. I better not mention the promotion that has been offered to us, but speak to Sean Lazenby @ Smoothwall. Hint: BOGOF 3
tom_newton Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 We too are currently looking at the SmoothWall UTM-1000 Appliance, but 2 of them. I better not mention the promotion that has been offered to us, but speak to Sean Lazenby @ Smoothwall. Hint: BOGOF Watch it... the Sean lurks here 1
michaelf Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 The only experience I've had of the two vendors is with a Sonicwall VPN, however we have had some issues with their support when we've run up against issues. From what I've seen however the Smoothwall people always seem to have a strong presence on here for support. 2
FN-GM Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 We used to use SonicWall and the filtering was rubbish! All the URLS i found that went through SonicWall all where blocked by Smoothwall. 3
SwedishChef Posted March 3, 2011 Posted March 3, 2011 We are trialing smoothwall, and currently waiting for the new version shown at betts (lots of improvements) to it. I am very impressed, but im not going to say how much as I'll nail sean down on price, but we run it in a vmware and the license allows you to create as many vm's running smooth wall as you like for redundancy. It rocks, i used to use sonic wall a long time ago but i can't much for it recently. 3
Cools Posted March 4, 2011 Posted March 4, 2011 I will say I went with another vendor for my E-mail filter. im looking to set up Googles Postini service to filter all my emails sent to the exchange server..
walker01642 Posted March 28, 2011 Posted March 28, 2011 We are currently trialling Sonicwall but are having trouble with LDAP authentication with laptops. The situation is this: A user gets a laptop out of the charging cabinet, switches it on and immediately logs on to browse to the internet. The sonicwall uses LDAP to communicate with active directory and log them into sonicwall. However the laptops also have Sophos antivirus on and it uses an account such as 'Sophos-SAU{laptopname}' to update it's virus definitions as soon as the laptop is booted. The problem is Sonicwall takes the sophos update account and tries to log that in instead of the user account. This fails, the user is not logged in and cannot use the internet! Does this problem occur with Smoothwall as well?
tom_newton Posted March 28, 2011 Posted March 28, 2011 @walker01642: Generally not a problem, no. What we'd usually advise people to do is not authenticate for the sophos update site. There's 101 ways to solve it though - including using connection-based auth methods like NTLM (where each actual connection is auth'd rather than session auth). I am sure one of my colleagues would be happy to set you up an evaluation if you are considering a move.
Oops_my_bad Posted March 28, 2011 Posted March 28, 2011 How many machines do you have? It's not uncommon to run Sophos EM on site and update from that instead. Otherwise is there an exception you can setup in sonicwall or something?
psillars Posted March 29, 2011 Posted March 29, 2011 Hi walker01642 I was wondering. Have you installed the single signon agent for the SonicWALL install to help it work out the actual user logged in? Paul
pforlini Posted March 16, 2017 Posted March 16, 2017 I am having an issue with smoothwall swg and SonicWALL. We are having connectivity issues.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now