Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
You say those statistics as if they're small, but apply that to real people and that is 46.9million people dead if the same percentages were used today...

 

Which will take almost a third of a year to make up in new births!

Posted

Based on a population of the UK from wiki 61,612,300 (2009 estimate)

 

28percent infected (from earlier spanish flu stats)

2.5% of infected died

 

Total losses in similar scenario are 462092

 

That's four hundred and sixty two thousand and ninty two

 

That's a little over half the population of Leeds

 

2.5% of 28% sounds like nothing until you stick it into real people numbers.

Posted (edited)
apply that to real people and that is 46.9million people dead

 

150k in the US, 700k in the US, compared to 20 million in India shows its very dependant on the quality of life. Considering this was also at the same time as a world war and at a time of great poverty, even for the western nations has serious effect on the ability to contain and treat the disease.

 

Keep in mind the natural death rate the last 100 years in the UK has dropped from 25k per Million to around 8k and the majority of deaths coming before they are 45 to over 65.

 

The current 'natual' death rate of InFLUenza in the US is around 60k per year.

Cancer and heart disease kills more than 600k each in the US now.

 

Theorising how many deaths that may happen now is all well and good, but theres a big difference between 1918 and 2009.

 

Finally there is still no proof the current swine influenza has the ability to transverse humans yet.

Edited by Theblacksheep
Posted
Based on a population of the UK from wiki 61,612,300 (2009 estimate)

 

28percent infected (from earlier spanish flu stats)

2.5% of infected died

 

Total losses in similar scenario are 462092

 

That's four hundred and sixty two thousand and ninty two

 

That's a little over half the population of Leeds

 

2.5% of 28% sounds like nothing until you stick it into real people numbers.

 

But that's only half of Leeds - what about the other half?

Posted

There is still no proof the current swine influenza has the ability to transverse humans yet.

 

WHO has classed this as phase 4 of the pandemic level. Their site clearly explains what that means.

 

Phase 4 is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.” The ability to cause sustained disease outbreaks in a community marks a significant upwards shift in the risk for a pandemic.

Posted
As I said above, the 1918 pandemic, although pretty bad, wasn't all that when the facts are looked at. Globally 2.5% of people infected died, so 97.5 people survived. & only 28% of people were infected at all. This was in 1918! I think we should be a lot better prepared and sorted now.

 

With the ability to travel faster these days the number of people you come into contact with in a day is vastly increased compared to an equivalent person in 1918 meaning the potential audience for transmission is far greater. Considering the quantity of people who have had the virus I would say that its pretty likely that it is transmitting between humans, unless all these people had contact with the one potential farm its supposed to have come from.

Posted (edited)
WHO has classed this as phase 4 of the pandemic level. Their site clearly explains what that means.

 

Phase 4 is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal OR human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.”

 

 

You failed to read their clearly explained site or mark in bold the big 'OR' in your quote.

 

Its infectedpig->human. There is still no proof it can transverse humans yet.

Edited by Theblacksheep
Posted
You failed to read their clearly explained site or mark in bold the big 'OR' in your quote.

 

Its infectedpig->human. There is still no proof it can transverse humans yet.

 

No he didn't... From the WHO

 

Phase 4 is characterized by verified human-to-human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus able to cause “community-level outbreaks.” The ability to cause sustained disease outbreaks in a community marks a significant upwards shift in the risk for a pandemic. Any country that suspects or has verified such an event should urgently consult with WHO so that the situation can be jointly assessed and a decision made by the affected country if implementation of a rapid pandemic containment operation is warranted. Phase 4 indicates a significant increase in risk of a pandemic but does not necessarily mean that a pandemic is a forgone conclusion.

 

This means there has to be verified human-to-human transmission to be at this level... of either an animal or an human-animal influenza reassortant virus.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
As I said above, the 1918 pandemic, although pretty bad, wasn't all that when the facts are looked at.
420000 dead in Britain alone. Suppose that's not too bad; except that it is the young (20-50) that seem to get it worst due to the immune systems reaction...

 

:painkiller:

Posted
420000 dead in Britain alone. Suppose that's not too bad; except that it is the young (20-50) that seem to get it worst due to the immune systems reaction...

 

:painkiller:

 

I think that the mortallity rate is still higher in the older and younger generations. The transmission rate will be higher within that group because generally the 20-50s are in contact with a lot more people at work etc.

Posted
But that's only half of Leeds - what about the other half?

 

Funny that, it's exactly what my HOD said when I told her.

 

Dunno, "Outbreak" style fuel-air bomb? That solve the problem for you?

 

(my apologies to all those living in or associated with Leeds)

Posted
I think that the mortallity rate is still higher in the older and younger generations. The transmission rate will be higher within that group because generally the 20-50s are in contact with a lot more people at work etc.

Not as I read it. Based on 1918, the very young still had childhood antibodies, and the old had antibodies from a previous outbreak of a similar strain, and were thus protected. The young & healthy were badly hit.

Posted
Not as I read it. Based on 1918, the very young still had childhood antibodies, and the old had antibodies from a previous outbreak of a similar strain, and were thus protected. The young & healthy were badly hit.

 

This was based on the spanish flu epidemic which was rare for an influenza type virus. Thats not to say this one wouldn't be the same tho :s

Posted
One of the teachers is off sick at the moment at my Wifes school after being in contact with someone who has recently been to Mexico on holiday. *cough*panic*cough*
Posted
Funny that, it's exactly what my HOD said when I told her.

 

Dunno, "Outbreak" style fuel-air bomb? That solve the problem for you?

 

(my apologies to all those living in or associated with Leeds)

 

If L4d taught me anything, you will need an auto shotgun, a few improvised explosives and always aim for the head just to be sure.

Posted
The infected woman from Birmingham is actually from Redditch which is just as close to me.... time to dig out the hazmat suit :p

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...