Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't think there's any issues with me not doing it, I would prefer a PCR done by a professional for a real assessment. The BMJ has said lateral flow tests could cause serious harm https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/12/covid-19-government-must-urgently-rethink-lateral-flow-test-roll-out/

 

I'm just getting fed up of all the information overload now - don't know what to believe anymore, think I just want to get covid to get it over and done with regardless of the outcome

That's an interesting article. I wish the journalists raised questions about this sort of expert commentary rather than coyly ask whether a bike ride 7 miles from home is permitted. To be honest, given non-answers are given and then they move on, we have to rely on more in depth interviews but I've seen few that constructively, yet critically hold them to account. These sorts of topics are deeply related to the battle against Coronavirus, so this isn't a political viewpoint, it's more a scientific one.

Posted
Mum’s GP practice has announced on FB this morning that they’re finally starting to invite people for vaccination. Hopefully she won’t have long to wait now [emoji4] 🤞

 

EDIT

 

Four hours later she’s received the call and going on Saturday :) :) :)

I'm pleased to hear that for you both. My FiL got his call and is in Sat too. Were you provided with a date for the second dose. I've heard local stories that this was given, at 12 weeks as expected, but on occasions a different venue which was much further away.

Posted
Mum’s GP practice has announced on FB this morning that they’re finally starting to invite people for vaccination. Hopefully she won’t have long to wait now [emoji4] 🤞

 

EDIT

 

Four hours later she’s received the call and going on Saturday :) :) :)

 

My mum (85) also got her appointment this morning. She's having her first jab on Saturday, too. :)

Posted

On the topic of testing, many of us are familiar with the lateral flow test used in schools, as well as the more accurate but slower process PCR testing. There is a further test that was trialled at Southampton University, with general support, but also used (or at least proposed for use) at Heathrow and by Virgin Airlines. These are sometimes referred to as LAMP tests - it shares some of the PCR approach, but appears to be usable on a smaller scale. 30 minute turnarounds appear to be achievable and with high accuracy. Gov website has a couple of articles relating to these at:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/clinical-evaluation-confirms-accuracy-of-lamp-test

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats/rapid-evaluation-of-optigene-rt-lamp-assay-direct-and-rna-formats

 

Clearly, due to the need for onsite equipment might mean it's only suited for larger establishments, but you'd think it makes sense for universities, colleges and maybe large secondaries. Overall however, I understand the per person test cost is relatively low and every case that doesn't end up in ICU saves thousands in cash terms and so much more in human terms. What I don't know is what the plans are going forwards, but LAMP testing would appear far superior to the current lateral flow tests.

Posted
I don't think there's any issues with me not doing it, I would prefer a PCR done by a professional for a real assessment. The BMJ has said lateral flow tests could cause serious harm https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/12/covid-19-government-must-urgently-rethink-lateral-flow-test-roll-out/

The BMJ has been saying that for quite some time, hence my post almost a month ago.

 

I wonder who is making money on these tests?

 

https://www.private-eye.co.uk/issue-1536/newsHere we go...

Private Eye's coverage has been excellent, particularly MD's Coronavirus articles.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The school testing can potentially be harmful to controlling the virus. Lateral flow test is only accurate if person has high amount of virus , much less accurate in other scenario. With the new strain being more infectious, I wonder if person would still infect others when they have a small amount of virus cells in his/her body. Harm can come from people behaviour, some would be more relaxed after testing negative, but they could have virus in their bodies and be infectious.

It will help with early detection, but it is still early days. I think the data on mass testing from Liverpool was still not released, so scientist cannot assess it.

 

I just hope that vaccination program will be as scheduled, but with so many cocks up I don't have much faith

Posted
Don't know what all the fuss about us getting tested is as we're obviously immune. At least that's what the staff at my schools seem to think, as I'm expected to go into classes full of kids (and staff). Feel for the staff too, but at least they only have one bubble to contend with.
  • Thanks 1
Posted
AstraZeneca is “imminently” scaling up to release 2m doses of its vaccine a week in the UK, and may be able to go above that from April, the firm’s chief executive said. Tom Keith-Roach, the president of AstraZeneca UK, said 1.1m doses of the company’s Covid-19 jab developed with Oxford University had been released to the UK to date, but the aim was to reach 2m doses per week on or before the middle of February.[/Quote]*

 

Currently vaccinated: 2.6 million

Government target/promise: 15 million by "mid February"

 

So that's 12.5 million remaining in 4 weeks and 4 days which is a rolling rate of 2.8 million per week....

 

I'm struggling to find out what rate the Pfizer vaccine is being delivered at, but so far it seems about 300,000 per week.

 

It's actually really impressive that there is a vaccine at all, never mind that it is being rolled out really quickly - so why promise something that will inevitably fail?

 

*From: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/13/second-shots-of-covid-vaccine-could-be-delayed-further-in-england?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
*

 

Currently vaccinated: 2.6 million

Government target/promise: 15 million by "mid February"

 

So that's 12.5 million remaining in 4 weeks and 4 days which is a rolling rate of 2.8 million per week....

 

I'm struggling to find out what rate the Pfizer vaccine is being delivered at, but so far it seems about 300,000 per week.

 

It's actually really impressive that there is a vaccine at all, never mind that it is being rolled out really quickly - so why promise something that will inevitably fail?

 

*From: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/13/second-shots-of-covid-vaccine-could-be-delayed-further-in-england?

The over promising can get tiresome, but there are three approved vaccines in the UK, with perhaps more approvals coming, so perhaps they need to be taken account of. It is noticeable that the constant message is the NHS can deliver the jabs if the pharma companies can deliver the vaccines. That's a comment on politics, not a political comment!!!

Posted

When I was working I always started the year by remarking

"is it me or is this year dragging"

 

Oh how we laughed!

 

 

This year it would seem especially apt!

 

 

Good wishes to everyone working out there

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Link: Covid: Large trial of new treatment begins in UK [bBC News]

 

A large-scale trial of a new treatment it is hoped will help stop Covid-19 patients from developing severe illness has begun in the UK.

 

The first patient received the treatment at Hull Royal Infirmary on Tuesday afternoon.

 

It involves inhaling a protein called interferon beta which the body produces when it gets a viral infection.

 

The hope is it will stimulate the immune system, priming cells to be ready to fight off viruses.

 

Early findings suggested the treatment cut the odds of a Covid-19 patient in hospital developing severe disease - such as requiring ventilation - by almost 80%.

 

It was developed at Southampton University Hospital and is being produced by the Southampton-based biotech company, Synairgen.

 

A course of treatment with the new drug could cost around £2,000, which is not that expensive for a hospital treatment.

 

"To be viable it will have to represent good value for money," Synairgen's chief executive Richard Marsden said...

Posted (edited)

I wonder how many of these novel treatments will be found to cure/prevent/reduce other diseases once the crisis is over?

 

Would be great if the common cold is also 'fixed' by one of the cheaper vaccines... But I'd guess that BigPharma would have buried that like a shot*. They make too much from cough/cold 'remedies'.

 

 

 

*unintended

Edited by Andrew_C
Posted
Besides, something like the common cold might be good in the (very) long term as an evolutionary step to keep the natural immune system 'fit'.
Posted

One of my schools has just sent out an "all hands on deck next week" email (I'm assuming the obvious exceptions are still in place!) due to the amount of staff needed to sort out remote learning and the increasing numbers of pupils on site.

 

So much for schools being closed.

Posted
I am guessing that it's the treatment/delivery that's new, maybe?

 

I suspect that's just part of it. Interferons are in fact not a single product, but a class of proteins called cytokines - you may have heard of a 'cytokine storm' where the body's immune system effectively destroys itself. Patients with severe systems receiving some interferons, to quote an article, can lead to 'catastrophic' results. For anyone interested who has had Covid-19 symptoms in the last 7 days might be able to sign up to the trial - https://www.covidtrialathome.com/ for this treatment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...