Gatt Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 [ATTACH=CONFIG]30444[/ATTACH] Good luck holding the snp back in the quest of independance. Also good luck in europe your going to need it. Hmm....
BassTech Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 UKIP had 3rd most votes, but only 1 seat. SNP had 5th most votes, and get 56 seats. Democracy in action :/ 1
tmcd35 Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 UKIP had 3rd most votes, but only 1 seat. SNP had 5th most votes, and get 56 seats. Democracy in action :/ Say's something about us as a nation... 2011 - Vote No to alternative voting 2015 - Give Cameron a Tory majority 2017 - Vote to Exit EU?
Garacesh Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Starting to think I should take out a loan and make my own party based around election reform. "What are your policies?" "Proportional representation and a valid vote of no confidence." "What about Education? Transport? Crime?" "Don't care. Fix voting. Someone else can sort the rest out." I'd totally get elected.
localzuk Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 I've had several people say "ah, but PR would let UKIP in!" to me today, and it has made me think - it underlines that people don't really understand the different options. If we had PR, UKIP would have, what, 12% of the seats? That would not mean they had any power. A government would still form from a coalition of the largest party and whoever it pairs up with. Not many parties would be willing to pair up with UKIP, so the situation would be unchanged there. However, those 12% of the population would actually have representation in parliament!
sonofsanta Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 I cannot fathom how this has happened. Even if Labour had held all its traditional Scottish seats, they'd still have been nowhere near. Really feeling quite depressed about it all this morning
ghafoor Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 The sad truth is Labour voted in the wrong miliband. This coupled with sheeple unable to get their head around the fact their are voting for a party and its policies and not a popularity contest between the two leaders. Its depressing stuff. At least Mr Balls losing his seat is a good thing, at least replacing milliband with balls in not an option as I think the sheeple would never get over such a move. I totally agree with the above statement. I think David would have been a much much better choice. He was far more charismatic and a better speaker and had alot of flair. As it turns out Labour will need to look for another leader soon.
tmcd35 Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 It certainly justifies voter apathy when the Beeb can ask 22,000 random people and get the right result. The other 46m need not bother
pcstru Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 UKIP had 3rd most votes, but only 1 seat. SNP had 5th most votes, and get 56 seats. The SNP were only fielding candidates in 59 seats, perhaps you should normalise the data and show the ratio of the votes they got to the votes they were competing for (SNP - 50%), UKIP came nowhere close to that.
pcstru Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 It certainly justifies voter apathy when the Beeb can ask 22,000 random people and get the right result. The other 46m need not bother They do not ask people at 'random'. It was an amazing piece of modelling given that a small error on marginal seats would give a large error in the prediction.
korifugi Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Looking at the results, the mistake a lot of people made was to vote UKIP as a protest against Conservative and Liberal. Voting Labour may have made the difference Thing is - protest votes (certainly under the current status quo) don't work. It's like not being able to decide whether to have Coca Cola or Pepsi, and instead choosing to drink your own urine.
zag Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 The sad truth is Labour voted in the wrong miliband. This coupled with sheeple unable to get their head around the fact their are voting for a party and its policies and not a popularity contest between the two leaders. Its depressing stuff. At least Mr Balls losing his seat is a good thing, at least replacing milliband with balls in not an option as I think the sheeple would never get over such a move. Pretty much this! Its Labours own fault for giving the unions too much voting power for their leader. Shot themselves in the foot right there!!
LeMarchand Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Didn't you? I realised that was going to happen a while ago. In fact, this election has gone as expected. The Tories have won and the lies about labour collapsing the whole world economy and the stacks against miliband by the Tory faithful has paid off. Congratulation on the great deception and another 5 years of Tory misery. I don't know a lot about David, but I suspect you may be right, Miliband just doesn't seem PM material.. Just watching him on PMQ's the last few months has shown that he isn't as strong or confident as Cameron At least Ed took part in the TV debates. Horrible results so far. Think I may take up alcoholism. Things to look forward to: 1. EU referendum 2. Scotland pushing for another independence referendum 3. An attempt to get rid of the hunting ban 4. More cuts and attacks on the poor and disabled 5. More wealth going straight into the pockets of the rich 6. More privatisation of the NHS 7. More badger culling Yay. Yep. 3: Personally I think the SNP story is a bit of a sideshow this election - well done to them by the way. They were never a real issue for Labour. The real story of this election is the Liberal Democrats! It's interesting, for 5 years they've been boo'd for getting in bed with the Tories and what happens at the election - their voters switch to Tory en mass. You would have thought they would be more ideologically aligned to Labour. I can't understand that either. All of this still makes me hate the FPTP system. SNP got 1.4m votes and get 54 seats. Greens get 1 million votes and get 1 seat... Or Lib Dem's get 2.1m votes and get 8 seats. Entirely undemocratic and unfair. On the other hand, with PR we'd have a lot of UKIP MPs. Everyone seems horrified that it looks like Conservative will get a majority. Everyone I've seen, everything I've read online. So who on earth did all that voting for them? Or perhaps it's just the company I keep only shows a particular view. I don't know anyone who would admit to voting for Boris as Mayor, and yet... There's a pattern developing... I know Jeez we've got TTIP to look forward to now. http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/21238483/images/1350929100875.jpg Save me a bullet. Looking at the results, the mistake a lot of people made was to vote UKIP as a protest against Conservative and Liberal. Voting Labour may have made the difference I know what you mean, but it's not really much of a protest!
sonofsanta Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 From the editor of the Spectator, via the BBC Live page:
localzuk Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 On the other hand, with PR we'd have a lot of UKIP MPs. Yup, but then that'd be the will of the electorate. If that's what people want, why shouldn't they have it?
localzuk Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Just announced - Ed Milliband is to resign as leader of Labour, according to the Guardian.
zag Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Just announced - Ed Milliband is to resign as leader of Labour, according to the Guardian. At least Labour supporters have something to celebrate today!
localzuk Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 At least Labour supporters have something to celebrate today! Question is - will whoever takes over make the party lurch violently right again or will they carry on moving it back towards left a bit?
LeMarchand Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Question is - will whoever takes over make the party lurch violently right again or will they carry on moving it back towards left a bit? My guess is that the thinking will be "UKIP are gaining ground and we did well under Tory Blair - let's go right". I'd like to hope I'm wrong.
zag Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Question is - will whoever takes over make the party lurch violently right again or will they carry on moving it back towards left a bit? Intriguing indeed. I still think Labour should stick to the centre ground like Tony Blair did. New labour was an election winning formulae, I don't understand why Ed went to the Left and threw it all away...
tmcd35 Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 I think the more important question is what does last night mean for us? I doubt (fingers double-crossed) we'll see Gove back in Education, but what can we expect. Those of us not already in MAT's might be getting a little paranoid about the future.
tmcd35 Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Intriguing indeed. I still think Labour should stick to the centre ground like Tony Blair did. He wasn't center ground - he was a Thatcherite in a red tie! Still better than the alternative mind.
Garacesh Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 I don't get it.. You get a shot at PM and if you don't get it, you're out? That doesn't really strike me as a party behind their leader? Strikes me more as a "We'll throw everyone at the wall one-by-one and see who sticks."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now