Pottsey Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 We have a great ratio of computers 1.3 ish students per computer if I include laptops. The oldest 4 years old computers should being phased out this year for some new dual core desktops. But only half are networked. Well excluding the wireless laptops I would say 1 third of the desktops are networked. No IT suite as its not needed here according to management and due to the kids (our students have moderate learning difficulty’s and/or behaviour difficulty’s) everyone in managements decided no more then 1 computer with internet access per room as the general rule. “and possibly have them communicating with each other?†We are still in the Dark Age’s with a peer to peer network. Virus checker updates are fun before I started someone went around and did it all manually via CD. As soon as I started I automated the half that are networked. I did try and talk to management about getting a server but I couldn’t justify the cost or come up with any good reasons to get one. Time saving was the only reason but they prefer to pay me for extra hours over getting a server. There really isn’t any benefit for us. Bit of a unique situation we are in I guess after reading everyone else’s posts. “Are you a High School? You can get away with it at Primary Level (depending on the size)†Special needs secondly school with 60 ish computers + laptops and 70ish pupils.
russdev Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 no not unqiue some of us working in high schools forget there whole another world... point is if dont need server then dont as long as it works for school you are at.. On another note maybe contact local college maybe able to get an old server that can upgrade for your needs russ
Geoff Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 At the Primary schools I usually have 2 servers. 1x W2k3 Server doing the usual AD stuff/WSUS/File and Print. 1x Linux server doing DNS/DHCP/Web Proxy. At the High School 2x Admin servers for SIMS.Net 1x Linux Terminal Server 1x Linux Mail Server 2x Linux Web Servers 1x Linux Development server 1x Exchange Server 1x File & Print 2x DCs 7x Random Windows Servers that I can't remeber what they do.
NetworkGeezer Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 @Geoff: Excuse me for being nosey but why two SIMS servers? Do you have the DMS and SQL separate?
Geoff Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 I should clarify that. No 1 is a DC with File and Print etc. No 2 runs sims.net At least I think that's how it's setup. They run a seperate 'admin' domain on a seeprate VLAN to everything else.
Gatt Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 2 x DC's 2 x File Server (1 is administered by the LEA 1 x SIMS Server (LEA's) 1 x Intranet Server 1 x ISA Server
sahmeepee Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 14(+2) physical servers, 530 clients, ~1900 humans or similar 2 x DC's (+DHCP+DNS) 1 x Exchange 1 x ISA+Websense+WSUS 1 x SIMS 1 x FMS 1 x NAS 2 x Fileservers (i.e. normal WS2003 instead of storage edition) 1 x Applications/shared storage/SQL Server/print/cruft 1 x Sharepoint/classserver 1 x Terminal server (gradually on its way out) (not rackmount) 1 x Cashless catering database server (not rackmount) 1 x MOM2000 (not rackmount) +(2 x IP Camera servers (not rackmount)) =14(+2) The camera servers are servers, but we don't really manage them as such: they're more like appliances. I can't really get any more servers because I struggled to do that list from memory as it is!
free4440273 Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 5 domain servers (ibm and dell). 3 nas kits. 6 mimo wireless (linksys). 600 desktops (hp). 250 laptops (ibm). 25 b/w printers. 12 colour printers (hp).
john Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 20 servers for me, and you can never have enough, spread every role out , don't put too much load on one machine
GrumbleDook Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Off the top of my head ... 1x DC (master) 1x DC (SMS/MOM/DHCP/RIS) 1x File Server / Veritas BE 1x Package Server (to be decommisioned) 1x Web Server / Sleuth / shared storage 1x mail relay / SWS (SWS to be removed soon) / firewall logging 1x Applications / Print server 1x Sims.NET / admin file server 1x FirstClass (being removed and changed to a file server / Terminal Server) 1x Smoothwall (just in, not yet in full use) 1x Library server 1x QCA 1x Apple 1x Development (presently LNM) To arrive in the next few weeks 1x Exchange 1x DC (the SMS / MOM box will be demoted and RIS moved) 1x Terminal Server I make that 17. Most machines are running some form of SQL (MSSQL, MSDE, SQL Anywhere, MySQL) because different applications that are networked require a database. It tends to be this that means we can't stick anything else on and that we need a new box. After I have finished playing with LNM before Spot starts on the new domain we will be looking at Virtual Server again to put a number of applications onto the same box that would not have been possible. If that works then we may spend time looking at VMWare and so on to do the same.
openhgs Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 What I find interesting is that most sites have 2 or more DCs (and someone said that you must have at least two). Once again, we swim against the tide - we only have one. I know that MickeySoft say that you should have more than one, to handle machine failures and load balancing. Machine failures (both hardware and software) are far less frequent now than even 5 years ago, so do we REALLY need more that one DC? Also, I've never seen a DC stressed by excessive numbers of logins, but perhaps that is because I'be never worked at a really huge M$ site.
john Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 I think that two is usefull, as its a really quick way of keeping it alive if you have problems, just think, you can live without a printserver for a day or so whilst you repair it, but your whole world dies without Active Directory now a days, so in my mind its good practice to have two.
DMcCoy Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 What I find interesting is that most sites have 2 or more DCs (and someone said that you must have at least two). Once again, we swim against the tide - we only have one. I know that MickeySoft say that you should have more than one, to handle machine failures and load balancing. Machine failures (both hardware and software) are far less frequent now than even 5 years ago, so do we REALLY need more that one DC? Also, I've never seen a DC stressed by excessive numbers of logins, but perhaps that is because I'be never worked at a really huge M$ site. I can't say I've ever tried to get a domain going again that only had once DC that is now dead. I'm quite sure I don't want to find out! I have both dcs running dhcp (50/50 split), dns, gc, wins, ad. If one fails every other settings for the servers and clients means they can continue to function with no loss of service. Also means I can patch and do a quick reboot one at a time with no real issues for the clients.
tosca925 Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 2 x DC's 1 x Printer Server 1 x Application Server 1 x Sims 1 x CMiS 1 x ePortal 1 x Exchange 1 x Proxy 1 x NAS 2 x Storage/Back Up 1500 Kids, 170 Staff, 750 Clients.
Norphy Posted April 29, 2006 Posted April 29, 2006 Hmm. Lets see now... Root domain DC and BDC (2 Servers) Student domain DC and BDC (2 servers) Staff domain DC and BDC (2 servers) Primary file server Application and printer server SIMS server Bromcom server Ghost/AV/General Crap repository server Terminal Server 2 Proxy Servers That makes 14 I think. The SIMS server is due to be replaced within the next two months and we'll be adding a server for the learning platform, whichever one we decide to go for. Fun fun fun
unixman Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I'm with @openhgs on this. One DC is all we have too and it works fine. If that box dies, we have no CMIS either, but in the last two years the box has only been down twice as a consequence of hardware. Both times were when I resited it. We get CMIS issues but these are application problems and so no amount of DCs will resolve them. your whole world dies without Active Directory now a days, so in my mind its good practice to have two. We don't use Active Directory either. Microsoft say you have too, but don't believe em! W2K works fine without using it. It *might* be called "Active Directory Users & Computers" but it is the same as existed on NT4.
DMcCoy Posted April 30, 2006 Posted April 30, 2006 I'm with @openhgs on this. One DC is all we have too and it works fine. If that box dies, we have no CMIS either, but in the last two years the box has only been down twice as a consequence of hardware. Both times were when I resited it. We get CMIS issues but these are application problems and so no amount of DCs will resolve them. your whole world dies without Active Directory now a days, so in my mind its good practice to have two. We don't use Active Directory either. Microsoft say you have too, but don't believe em! W2K works fine without using it. It *might* be called "Active Directory Users & Computers" but it is the same as existed on NT4. Its not about one DC working well, its about when it doesn't! I'm not sure I see the point of using Windows 2000 server or above without active directory, you lose all of advantages over nt4. You may as well save some money and use samba.
Richie1972 Posted May 6, 2006 Posted May 6, 2006 We're currently running 13, but this is likely to grow as we develop more services and improve disaster recovery and content provision. 1. SIMS (and soon PARS) 2. Domain controller and 3 years of students data 3. Domain controller, 2 years of students data, public files and QCA testing 4. domain controller, staff data and staff public files 5. Backup server 6. school database server 7. Succesmaker and Eclipse server 8. Print server 9. IT apps, drivers and IT database system (something I'm implementing across school for management of desktops and resources, etc) 10. Second IT server that currently just handles RIS installations 11. ISA server - provides web access through LEA and ADSL, plus VPN access for tech staff. Also has Websense filtering - makes our life so much easier for blocking/unblocking websites 12. Frogserver - the school VLE 13. Reporting server. Primarily used for Websense web filtering reporting, but also has 3Com network supervisor running on it All are running Windows 2003... except frogserver, which has LiSUX on it. I reckon by end of year we could be at around 16 servers... looking at adding a media server, second backup server for improved disaster recovery and possibly a development server.
W32Jbot Posted May 20, 2006 Posted May 20, 2006 Ok here goes, the contents of the countries biggest schools server room And there are only 14 servers;). Armadillo - FMS And Alice (library) Aardvark - ISA Alewife - MIS Antelope - ILS (Succesmaker enterprise) Was Sophos server but couldnt cope AyeAye - Print Axlotl - Backup + DC Appgate - VPN Contentcache - Caches content Cougar - DC, DNS, Staff data, Ranger, QCA Cheetah - DC, DHCP, Student data Caracal - VLE, Sophos enterprise Emu - Exchange and intranet TLMSData - Access control This lot cater for 3000 students (3400 from Sept) about 500-600 staff, A leisure center, and a theatre. It is supported by a team of 6 which includes 3 techs whom are leased out to feeder schools for a couple of hours each day, And a dedicated MIS support person. Structured like this, IS Manager, Network manager, Senior tech and then 3 techs We have Approx 400 laptops and 500 desktops. Dont laugh but we have not VLAN'd yet, and are looking to consolidate all our sql servers. Other than our VPN running Sun Solaris we are M$ all the way. @ DanIT, dont you think you could thin that lot out a bit?
Teth Posted June 8, 2006 Posted June 8, 2006 Quake 3 server? Do you let them play at lunch time or something?
browolf Posted June 8, 2006 Posted June 8, 2006 2000 users, 700 workstations, 150 laptops 3 domain controllers win2k 1 standalone server 1 exchange 5.5 server 1 isa 2004 server 1 backup 1 ghost server 2 (identical) print servers 1 linux proxy 1 mac server 1 linux gateway (mac network > academic network) next week we're getting 3 new rack servers (to replace 2 dc + 1 exchange 2003) 2 nas boxes
mrforgetful Posted June 8, 2006 Posted June 8, 2006 1 Exchange 2003 1 ISA 2004 1 Print 1 DHCP etc 1 Backup 1 Applications 1 NAS
kestrel1 Posted June 8, 2006 Posted June 8, 2006 We are running 10 servers, as follows: 1) PDC/ file server 2) Print server 3) Web/Proxy server (Unix) 4) 4 x Citrix Application servers (Thin Client network) 5) Key Skills Trainer server 6) Admin/SIMS server 7) Backup server for Admin/SIMS I know this looks like seven, but check out number 4. Might setup a BDC at some stage & add more Application servers as the network grows.
ANiceEnglishman Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 Curriculum Network About 280 clients 6 standalone PC's (in Music) 1 FR 2 DC's 1 CMIS server 1 web proxy server Admin Network 1 DC / SIMS server 25 clients Admin network and SIMS are being decom'd and users migrated to CMIS and the curriculum network. Staff Me Part of a part-time administrator
SteveD Posted June 29, 2006 Posted June 29, 2006 1 Admin 2 DNS/WINS/DC's 1 WWW 2 File 1 NAS 1 Print 1 VoIP 1 Voip voicemail 1 Exchange 2003 1 Avantis CD server (waste of time) 1 WUS/SUS 1 IDS 1 SchoolGuardian 1250 students, 150 staff, about 250 parents, 600 workstations, 150 laptops, no electricity
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now