Dos_Box Posted Friday at 10:33 Posted Friday at 10:33 Just a quick note to remind you all that comments about wage levels for jobs listings are not allowed in the Jobs Forum. This has been in the Jobs Forum rules for a very long time now - We can appreciate that in a lot of cases, the education sector wage levels are often well below that of the private sector, and in the current climate money is tighter than ever, but sometimes these kind of jobs, and even the wage, are perfect for someone out there. If the job and wage is not for you, then please just simply ignore it, especially as many of these listings posted by members have the T&C's set by the school management, not the IT dept. Telling off over
pete Posted Friday at 10:56 Posted Friday at 10:56 I refrain from commenting (and just note the employer isn't one I should ever consider). But the commentary usually isn't that "the wage for role X is low compared to private sector". Instead it tends to be "even for a school, that takes the mickey" or identical roles at schools 5 miles apart* are being offered at significantly different wages with the same intake demographics. *yes Lincolnshire, I'm looking at you. 2
Dos_Box Posted Friday at 12:44 Author Posted Friday at 12:44 Didn't they have that process quite some time back to set the wages for similar roles identically in local govt? I recall quite a bit of consternation from those in IT being graded the same as dinner staff. I suppose since MAT's became a thing and education almost privatised, they can now set whatever wages they want.
msi_school Posted Friday at 12:56 Posted Friday at 12:56 It is called single status and it assigned wages based on the content of the work rather than the traditional wage, so for example the team emptying bins used to get paid much more than the cleaners who filled the bins despite the similar work requirements because emptying bins is a traditionally male job and cleaning is a traditionally female job. This is how Birmingham went bankrupt, they had so many jobs that required the wages increasing that they could not afford it and kept putting it off. This process works with in an employer so LEA staff are grouped with the council but MAT staff are with the MAT, causing staff in neighbouring schools to be on widely different pay and conditions now. 1
dmj Posted Friday at 14:12 Posted Friday at 14:12 1 hour ago, msi_school said: This process works with in an employer so LEA staff are grouped with the council but MAT staff are with the MAT, causing staff in neighbouring schools to be on a race to the bottom with pay and conditions now. fixed that for you. Single status was 1997 ! I feel old. 2
machy Posted Friday at 14:15 Posted Friday at 14:15 2 minutes ago, dmj said: fixed that for you. Single status was 1997 ! I feel old. i was born in 97...
dmj Posted Friday at 14:16 Posted Friday at 14:16 Just now, machy said: i was born in 97... You're making it worse 2
Olliedawg Posted Friday at 14:34 Posted Friday at 14:34 18 minutes ago, dmj said: You're making it worse 1998 here (sorry)
Garacesh Posted Friday at 15:32 Posted Friday at 15:32 (edited) 1 hour ago, dmj said: Single status was 1997 ! I feel old. The school I first worked IT in moved to the single status framework circa 2015. I assume public schools still use it but wouldn't know for certain. More on topic, I'm in personally two minds about this. I appreciate that nobody wants the same cookie-cutter "lmao that salary is insulting" reply to lots of job postings, but on the other hand, it does feel like advertised salaries haven't even kept up with inflation, let alone anything else. Real-terms salaries feel lower these days than when I was working public schools, and I do wonder if the industry as a whole wouldn't benefit from a collective 'Give yer 'ead a wobble, mate'. Obviously edugeek aren't the arbiter of what does or does not constitute a sensible salary, and obviously they don't want to appear hostile to job listings as it's a source of income - which is reasonable. I just wonder if there's not a worthwhile discussion to be had to find a middle-ground. Ultimately, though, edugeek forum, edugeek rules, so I'm not going to kick up a fuss. Edited Friday at 15:32 by Garacesh 1 1
Popular Post Dos_Box Posted Friday at 15:45 Author Popular Post Posted Friday at 15:45 1 hour ago, Olliedawg said: 1998 here (sorry) You were 7 when EduGeek went live! I'm off for a little cry now. 5
TheHyperTechie Posted Monday at 07:38 Posted Monday at 07:38 On 02/10/2026 at 16:45, Dos_Box said: You were 7 when EduGeek went live! I'm off for a little cry now. 2001 here... (sorry for making you cry even more).
NegativeKillDeath Posted Monday at 08:55 Posted Monday at 08:55 1 hour ago, TheHyperTechie said: 2001 here... (sorry for making you cry even more). Youre only 2 years older than my Steam account! 3
BKGarry Posted Monday at 10:33 Posted Monday at 10:33 2 hours ago, TheHyperTechie said: 2001 here... (sorry for making you cry even more). Wow!, I sat my GCSEs then, and I am relatively young (or so I tell myself) 1
Omega_NL Posted Monday at 13:54 Posted Monday at 13:54 On 02/10/2026 at 11:33, Dos_Box said: sometimes these kind of jobs, and even the wage, are perfect for someone out there Perfect for who is the only question I'm interested in. £28k for a 'Senior Tech', a wage only someone just out of an apprenticeship would be interested in. Also there have been job postings on here where the listed salary was far too low and it turns out they just typed the wage in wrong, so would we now have to private message them as it's getting hard to tell which salaries are incorrect and which are genuine given how horrendous the salaries nowadays are.
Norphy Posted Monday at 14:30 Posted Monday at 14:30 On 02/10/2026 at 16:45, Dos_Box said: You were 7 when EduGeek went live! I'm off for a little cry now. If it makes you feel any better, I'm one of the early wave of users who was working in education when the site started up. You're not the only one who's being made to feel old here
6Foot2 Posted Monday at 14:59 Posted Monday at 14:59 On 02/10/2026 at 16:45, Dos_Box said: You were 7 when EduGeek went live! I'm off for a little cry now. I was 43 when Edugeek went live. 😖
Garacesh Posted Monday at 15:42 Posted Monday at 15:42 1 hour ago, Omega_NL said: Perfect for who is the only question I'm interested in. £28k for a 'Senior Tech', a wage only someone just out of an apprenticeship would be interested in. Also there have been job postings on here where the listed salary was far too low and it turns out they just typed the wage in wrong, so would we now have to private message them as it's getting hard to tell which salaries are incorrect and which are genuine given how horrendous the salaries nowadays are. Admittedly, I'm currently on 28.5 working 2nd line helpdesk/senior tech for a multinational organisation that's been around since the 1900's (as in, pre 1910) so sometimes it doesn't get better outside of education, either. That being said my senior tech duties in corporate are significantly fewer than senior tech in a school would be. IT is a criminally underpaid industry as a whole - you occasionally get unicorns that actually value the people protecting their data and infrastructure, but it seems few and far between. 1
sigma Posted Monday at 16:03 Posted Monday at 16:03 10 minutes ago, Garacesh said: Admittedly, I'm currently on 28.5 working 2nd line helpdesk/senior tech for a multinational organisation that's been around since the 1900's (as in, pre 1910) so sometimes it doesn't get better outside of education, either. That being said my senior tech duties in corporate are significantly fewer than senior tech in a school would be. IT is a criminally underpaid industry as a whole - you occasionally get unicorns that actually value the people protecting their data and infrastructure, but it seems few and far between. Those of us old enough to have been working in tech in the last century can probably recall when it paid, plus bonuses and perks very very well. (I'm older that 6foot2).
andy_b Posted Monday at 17:16 Posted Monday at 17:16 On 02/10/2026 at 15:12, dmj said: fixed that for you. Single status was 1997 ! I feel old. Agreement was reached in 1997, but the deadline for job evaluations and pay reviews was eventually set to March 2007 - so you can feel a little less old now
MicraMan Posted yesterday at 08:43 Posted yesterday at 08:43 this will make most of you feel old, 2005 here... 😂
BKGarry Posted yesterday at 08:57 Posted yesterday at 08:57 13 minutes ago, MicraMan said: this will make most of you feel old, 2005 here... 😂 Seriously, my Edugeek Account is only a year younger than you
TheHyperTechie Posted yesterday at 09:01 Posted yesterday at 09:01 16 minutes ago, MicraMan said: this will make most of you feel old, 2005 here... 😂 I honestly thought mine would be hard to beat in this forum. Now I am crying ..... thanks 😆
MicraMan Posted yesterday at 09:14 Posted yesterday at 09:14 yeah made my account early last year so i was still 19... 😅
dmj Posted yesterday at 10:19 Posted yesterday at 10:19 17 hours ago, andy_b said: Agreement was reached in 1997, but the deadline for job evaluations and pay reviews was eventually set to March 2007 - so you can feel a little less old now ahh. I'm sure we got it in 2003 as I think I was one of the first, £21k as a senior tech, or £40k in todays money.
Dos_Box Posted yesterday at 10:22 Author Posted yesterday at 10:22 I'd best move this to General Chat I think!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now