Grey-gear Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 (edited) Taken from the bbc news website "Rolf Harris has been questioned by police over historical allegations of sexual offences." BBC News - Rolf Harris questioned in Yewtree sex offence probe Edited April 19, 2013 by Grey-gear
SpuffMonkey Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 "Close your eyes.......can you guess what it is yet?" Oh no - Rolf! Are all my childhood heroes baddies? At this rate they'll be digging up Johnny Morris for bestiality soon 1
X-13 Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Are all my childhood heroes baddies? Granted I didn't read the story throughly this morning, but I've always read this type of thing as "you were around at the time, do you know anything about it?" Until I see a story saying he was arrested, I'm [perhaps wrongly] assuming innocence.
Neil-Millgate Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Granted I didn't read the story throughly this morning, but I've always read this type of thing as "you were around at the time, do you know anything about it?" Until I see a story saying he was arrested, I'm [perhaps wrongly] assuming innocence. Innocent until proven guilty doesnt seem to apply too much these days unfortuanutley.
LeMarchand Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Until I see a story saying he was arrested, I'm [perhaps wrongly] assuming innocence. I thought that one was supposed to assume innocence until conviction. Anyway, guess this confirms those rumours from last year about Rolf being pulled in.
X-13 Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 I thought that one was supposed to assume innocence until conviction. It is, but with things like this it seem to be "no smoke without fire". Even when people are found innocent there's people who still think they're guilty.
sted Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Innocent until proven guilty doesnt seem to apply too much these days unfortuanutley. same as people shouldnt be named until convicted (unless there is a very good rerason) as mud sticks
LeMarchand Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Does anyone know the scope of this investigation? Is it child abuse, or any sexual crime?
witch Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Yes, @SpuffMonkey - innocent until proved guilty - don't go all DailyFail on us I think he has been pulled in because he was around at the time, as @X-13 says 1
sonofsanta Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 same as people shouldnt be named until convicted (unless there is a very good rerason) as mud sticks Indeed; seen Matthew Kelly on TV much recently? I don't want to believe it of Rolf though, I don't though I think my personal "I'm giving up on humanity" moment would be if Tony Hart's name got dragged into it.
Sdrawkcab Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 I think he has been pulled in because he was around at the time, as @X-13 says According to the news article in the OP, he was actually arrested rather than just being brought in for questioning. This means they must have some evidence which leads them to beleive he might be guilty, as otherwise they'd just bring him in as a witness/reference surely? I'm not saying he's definitely guilty (how could I know?) but the fact that he was actually arrested is pretty worrying.
Disease Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 This is the second time he has been arrested, this time released on bail, his house was searched previously. It's nice to think that your childhood favorites were innocent and clean living, the reality is that were probably were not. As Jimmy Saville said "It was fun while it lasted!", now it's catching up on them all.
pcstru Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 I think my personal "I'm giving up on humanity" moment would be if Tony Hart's name got dragged into it. Google images of Morph and ask yourself two questions. 1. Is he wearing any clothes. 2. Just how much touching is appropriate for a plasticine model?
Marci Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Until I see a story saying he was arrested, I'm [perhaps wrongly] assuming innocence. Technically, arrest !== guilt either... altho these days I think 'guilt' is determined by a quick glance at twitter trends anyways.
sonofsanta Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Google images of Morph and ask yourself two questions. 1. Is he wearing any clothes. 2. Just how much touching is appropriate for a plasticine model? And do you think that nose was always attached to the face, or was it a joke part from elsewhere on his body?
Gibbo Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 same as people shouldnt be named until convicted (unless there is a very good rerason) as mud sticks He's done well so far. He's been interviewed on more than one occasion and this hasn't made the newspapers, raising questions about a media blackout. But its the double standards which bother me the most. When Saville was implicated ITV news couldn't wait to point score against the BBC and lead with it. But when Fred Talbot (of Richard and Judy outside weathermap dancing fame and lead weatherman on Granada News) was wanted for historical abuse allegations and subsequently went abroad, ITV went quiet. Same with the two Corrie actors (Frank Foster and Kevin Webster), nothing more than brief mentions. What will they do with Rolf? With ITV lead with "BBC Animal Hospital presenter Rolf Harris"? Will BBC counter with "ITV presenter from Rolfs Cartoon Time"?
edutech4schools Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 How did one of his songs go - Two little boys with two little toys...... NB. hero of mine so hope it is not true.
Gibbo Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Interesting article: Rolf Harris lawyers cited Leveson in attempt to suppress news of arrest Rolf Harris lawyers cited Leveson in attempt to suppress news of arrest | UK news | guardian.co.uk
truebluesteve Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Does anyone know the scope of this investigation? Is it child abuse, or any sexual crime? There are 3 threads to Op Yewtree 1. Actions by Saville 2. Allegations against Saville and others 3. Allegations against others unconnected with Saville. So potentially he could have been nicked for either of the last 2. Arresting him would give them time to interview him and make sure he doesn't disappear by putting him on bail. It seems that if you were famous in the 1970s then you are fair game. I wonder if any of this will come back to bite the Met on the backside!
SpuffMonkey Posted April 19, 2013 Posted April 19, 2013 Yes, @SpuffMonkey - innocent until proved guilty - don't go all DailyFail on us I think he has been pulled in because he was around at the time, as @X-13 says I know, I know - its all a bit depressing though. Given what you read in rock star memoirs (Led Zep et al) - you'd think they'd have collared a few of them too (G. Glitter not withstanding)...
speckytecky Posted April 20, 2013 Posted April 20, 2013 Sad situation as many of these people are national heroes. However, if they are guilty of sexual offences fair cop but I do wonder about all this - which national icon of that era will be besmirched next Benny Hill hasn't been in the news recently and he was responsible for the Fastest a milkman in the west?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now