kennysarmy

Issues here What a surprise.

Is anyone concerned about this? How can we ensure none of our services / accounts will be affected? Microsoft will soon begin enforcing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all Azure resource management actions. The company has announced that this change will go into effect on October 1, 2025. In a support document, Microsoft detailed that the mandatory MFA enforcement will apply to Azure CLI, PowerShell, SDKs, REST APIs, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools, and the Azure mobile app. This enforcement is a part of Microsoft’s Secure Future Initiative (SFI) that launched in November 2023. SFI is a multi-year strategy aimed at embedding security into every aspect of how the company designs, builds, and operates its technologies. It is built on three core principles: Secure by Design, Secure by Default, and Secure in Operations. SFI spans six engineering pillars, including identity protection, network security, threat detection, and rapid vulnerability remediation. “Starting October 1, 2025, MFA enforcement will gradually begin for accounts that sign in to Azure CLI, Azure PowerShell, Azure mobile app, IaC tools, and REST API endpoints to perform any Create, Update, or Delete operation,” the company explained on the Microsoft 365 Admin Center. “Enforcement applies to all Azure tenants in the public cloud and all users. This includes automation and scripts using user identities (instead of application IDs).”

Another incident this morning. Basically the con2prt program just refused to do anything for any logged on user (even admins) The fix was to remove the PC from the domain and re-add it, then it worked fine. Not sure how to troubleshoot this further and find the underlying issue though

Nothing obvious, I've amended the logon scripts to show a bit more details by removing @echo off Tried two suites this morning with a reactivated account (someone who left in the summer) and every PC logged on fine of course

I've just logged in to 24 computers using ABTutor in a suite of Win11 PC's. We use CON2PRT to map printers based on the name of the PC. Occasionally the logon script will stall. Out of 24 PC's I've just attempted to logon to, one has got "stuck". Anyone with any ideas as to how I can troubleshoot this? If I close the logon script down, logon proceeds as normal but obviously without the printers being setup.

I'm finding a few RETRY's and a reboots and it eventually starts to install.

From a quick Google! Addressing problems after buying If you discover faults after purchasing a used car, act promptly. First, contact the dealer to report the issue and provide fault details. You’re entitled to a repair, replacement, or refund within the first 30 days under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, If the dealer is uncooperative, escalate the matter by seeking advice from Citizens Advice or consider taking legal action. Document all communications and keep records to support your case. FAQs Do I have the right to return a used car? Yes, you have the right to return a used car if it’s faulty, not as described, or unfit for purpose. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 allows you to request repairs, a replacement, or a refund, depending on the situation. How long do I have to reject a used car? Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, you have 30 days from the purchase date to reject a faulty used car and claim a full refund. After 30 days, the dealer must offer a repair or replacement if issues arise.

We are being affected here - roll out updates via WSUS Interestingly Server updates also via WSUS are fine, it's just Win11.

I'd love to replace some of these switches, especially the AT ones, but there is simply NO money HP Switch E5406zl (J8697A) 9024 2510G-24 2510G-24 2510G-24 2510G-48 2510G-48 2510G-48 2520G-24 2520G-24 2520G-24 2520G-24-PoE 2520G-24-PoE 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48 2530-48G 2530-48G 2530-48G 2530-48G 2530G-48 2530G-48 8000S 8000S 8000S 8000S 8000S 8000S

Yes, I had already left for the day before the 3.20.0 email hit my inbox (thankfully) Looks like it might be a pain if that's been rolled out?

Imagine....

https://www.iamcloudstatus.com/ Currently we're being affected, anyone else? I wonder if any other 3rd party apps are being affected by this MS change?

Upon testing in ticket #605506 we found that the 'arealme' domain was calling 'www-arealme-com.webpkgcache.com.' 'www-arealme-com.webpkgcache.com' is categorised under Search Engines, rather than Humour and Distractions like 'arealme.com'

Yes we do. Is there a way to stop this app trying to open at startup?

Anyone able to shed any light on this new development on all PC's across our site 😕

Thanks - when running the test as a student I cannot see QUIC on the returned results 😕

Ours looks like this.... Not sure why it's been disabled 😕

Interesting.

I believe that's in place...

Searched for "a real me" as a test student and was then able to click the link to a blocked site Ticket 605506 opened.

Just so I understand. Smartphones can have set zooms like x3 x10 which would be optical zooms, effectively using a different lens for each magnification. So if you then pinch so say zoom in past x3 to say x5, does it switch to the x10 lens and crop?

Do you not just put the allow rule above the block rule?

I've just seen students searching for "core ball" and seen them click the returned links, the page opens and they are able to waste time playing the game, if I test with a test account I get the same results, with the game open and pressing to refresh the page gets blocked. What's going on, shouldn't smoothwall block the page on launch? I've had to block the search term "core ball" but this is less than ideal. Can anyone else with a smoothwall on-site box confirm the above behaviour. This is the link directly to the game. https://www.arealme.com/coreball/en/ We have https://www.arealme.com blocked But my searching for core ball and following the link returned by Google the site is accessible @tom_newton

Great. All installed. Now Smoothwall is causing this error : "Please confirm that TCP port 443 (HTTPS) and the domain - *myviewboard.com are allowed in your network setup and then try again." OK when I bypass the Smoothwall, myviewboard.com is unfiltered. Call opened with Smoothwall.

Thanks, Should install behaviour be left on User or can I amend it to System so it installs for everyone?