Earthling Posted April 16, 2012 Posted April 16, 2012 Put it this way - the internals of a PC are segmented. The PSU is in its own casing. If this casing is damaged, I'd say its a fail. However, outside that case, the maximum voltage is 12V. People in electronics and physics lessons use batteries and power supplies to supply projects with electricity. 12V.....same as electric train sets and Scalextrics, I believe, at least my old train set was. I miss my train set.
Oaktech Posted April 16, 2012 Posted April 16, 2012 The letter of the pat qualification says if the case is damaged it's a fail. But common sense and a little electrical understanding says that as long as the psu casing is undamaged then the voltages available through a damaged external casing should be low and as safer than a 9v battery! I would advise that the case should be repaired but more from a physical safety point of view rather than electrical safety.
DrCheese Posted April 30, 2012 Author Posted April 30, 2012 Thanks for the feedback. We decided to leave it as is for the moment. We feel that the kit is safe enough to use, as it's really just cosmetic damage. None failed for any other reason (They were tested) & If we felt that they were dangerous then we would take them out of action The massive great big "FAILED" stickers are annoying, but a huge chunk of our kit is being replaced over the summer, so they won't be around for too long
BTCC_Fan Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 Does this mean that all RaspberryPIs will fail their PAT tests as they have no case? I know its slighlty different because of the voltages but surely its the same principle.
2097 Posted April 30, 2012 Posted April 30, 2012 we got some new fujitsu's , kids pushed in the floopy slots I bought some cheap memory card readers , plugged them in jobs a gooden !
steven-glenburn Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Hey everyone We noticed these 2 machines in the pictures below had no floppy disk covers, so we taped them up ready for when the PAT testers came around to testing them. However, they have FAILED these, the floppy drives aren't even connected to any power as they don't get used by anyone. What do you guys think about this, is it wrong to have failed them!?
localzuk Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Personally, I think they're being overly officious. The entire point of open areas is 'can the person come in contact with electricity'. The answer to that in this case is 'no', so realistically, they're safe.
plexer Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Hey everyone We noticed these 2 machines in the pictures below had no floppy disk covers, so we taped them up ready for when the PAT testers came around to testing them. However, they have FAILED these, the floppy drives aren't even connected to any power as they don't get used by anyone. What do you guys think about this, is it wrong to have failed them!? Ask them why they failed them and counter their response. Ben
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now