CAM Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 You can view the page at http://www.edugeek.net/content.php?r=243-Fire-Extinguisher-Student-Jailed
DevilsAdvocate Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 Read about this yesterday. Sentence seems harsh (given the things some people seem to get away with) but glad they've punished him, yob.
localzuk Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 I think the sentence is fair. He could very easily have killed someone, and he was very lucky that he didn't.
jdoyle Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 not too many yobs confess to their family and then hand themselves in once they manage to find an open police station. Whilst he should be punished for a yobbish and stupid act, the sentence handed out is a disgrace.
featured_spectre Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 Thats actually a sentance I agree with!! The judge was right that if it hit someone, it would most likely have killed them, and would definately have been worse if it was a child!
teejay Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 Trouble is, that's definitely not the sentence he would've got if it wasn't such a high profile case, I doubt that would've even made court in normal circumstances. I also don't like sentencing on 'what if's', yes it was extremely stupid and dangerous what he did, but no-one actually got injured. It's like getting caught jumping a red light, it's a very stupid and dangerous thing to do, but then getting sentenced for death by dangerous driving as you could've killed someone. Think if he appeals then he'll probably get about 6 months suspended.
oxide54 Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 sentence aside (i'm undecided) I do think he deserved to be punished. And it was a very stupid thing to do, and people could have been seriously injured. if someone walks up to a crowded train station or shopping area with a bomb, if the bomb doesn't go off is that less of a crime than it actually going off?
teejay Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 sentence aside (i'm undecided) I do think he deserved to be punished. And it was a very stupid thing to do, and people could have been seriously injured. if someone walks up to a crowded train station or shopping area with a bomb, if the bomb doesn't go off is that less of a crime than it actually going off? Yep,it's attempted murder,not murder.
FN-GM Posted January 13, 2011 Posted January 13, 2011 Its a harsh sentence i think. When you compare it to the punishment people get for mugging...
Disease Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 I have no sympathy for him, it's about time judges started to hand out decent custodial sentences for violent behaviour, I hope the muppet enjoys his new career path at Asda. I think the government should have raised tuition fee's again after the riots to compensate the tax payer for the damage caused by these supposedly educated people.
mjs_mjs Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 He should have been hit with the fine for inappropriate use of a fire extinguisher as well. As far as I'm concerned it was stupid, he deserves all he gets.
jimmy_2k Posted January 15, 2011 Posted January 15, 2011 All I can say is, this student was lucky. That Fire Extingushier would have killed someone had it landed elsewhere.
torledo Posted January 15, 2011 Posted January 15, 2011 not too many yobs confess to their family and then hand themselves in once they manage to find an open police station. Whilst he should be punished for a yobbish and stupid act, the sentence handed out is a disgrace. well said.
Uraken Posted January 16, 2011 Posted January 16, 2011 "I hope the Muppet enjoys his new career path at Asda." Why should ASDA have to put up with the idiot (although i take your point).. This will hopefully send out a strong signal that this behavior should not be tolerated!
LeMarchand Posted January 16, 2011 Posted January 16, 2011 I agree that he deserves to go to jail. However the length of his sentence smacks of "being made an example of". Didn't that nursery worker who took pictures of children being abused only get 4 years? Smells like our lords and masters want to make sure that any protests against their policies are stamped on very hard.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now