Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Which is why you're coming from it from the wrong angle... Consider this - you've been here for quite a short time, and in that time, you've been given various warnings/had posts edited/been given a lot of negative rep. Does that not indicate to you that you are going about things in slightly the wrong way? Generally, if I am warned about something I've done, or find myself being given a ticking off by a large chunk of the community (ie. neg rep) then I'll think 'I may be wrong here...' and change the way I operate. Do you?

 

No just because my opinion differs from yours it is wrong, it is different. Consider this - You are not always right. As for my rep you are looking at it from the wrong angle. From this angle I could not care less. I know full well that the reason it is red is because a couple of members who enjoy leaving me nice messages via negative rep.

Posted
Regardless of whether it comes under the swearing policy, I think taking the time to remove 'crap' is a bit much, especially in forums such as the Red Door..obviously stronger words are a different matter
  • Thanks 1
Posted
I wasn't sure if it did. Someone here mentioned our female geography teacher might know, so Alaska.

 

I'd sCrap the whole thread mice elf.

Posted
No just because my opinion differs from yours it is wrong, it is different. Consider this - You are not always right. As for my rep you are looking at it from the wrong angle. From this angle I could not care less. I know full well that the reason it is red is because a couple of members who enjoy leaving me nice messages via negative rep.

 

It's red because your contributions are more aggressive and confrontational than they are constructive, informative and helpful.

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Please report any incidences of bad language that you see in order to help the mods who cannot spend their lives searching every post and do their best to police the site.

 

As Domino said, it is under discussion at the moment and so please let things lie until decisions have been made

  • Thanks 3
Posted
No just because my opinion differs from yours it is wrong, it is different. Consider this - You are not always right. As for my rep you are looking at it from the wrong angle. From this angle I could not care less. I know full well that the reason it is red is because a couple of members who enjoy leaving me nice messages via negative rep.

 

I know full well I'm not always right. :) No need to go all 'bold' and shouty...

 

I always thought messages could be left via PM? And rep was for indicating when you thought someone was doing a good thing, or if someone was behaving badly. You obviously know more about forums than me though. :rolleyes:

  • Thanks 1
Posted
It's red because your contributions are more aggressive and confrontational than they are constructive, informative and helpful.

 

You forgot to add rude. Still awaiting my reply by the way hunny.

 

Please report any incidences of bad language that you see in order to help the mods who cannot spend their lives searching every post and do their best to police the site.

 

As Domino said, it is under discussion at the moment and so please let things lie until decisions have been made

 

I think you will find I have.

Posted
I know full well I'm not always right. :) No need to go all 'bold' and shouty...

 

I always thought messages could be left via PM? And rep was for indicating when you thought someone was doing a good thing, or if someone was behaving badly. You obviously know more about forums than me though. :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Wow. Admitting your not always right.

 

Give me a minute to recover from my stagger and dizziness at reading such an informative revelation!

  • Thanks 2
Posted
I know full well I'm not always right. :) No need to go all 'bold' and shouty...

 

Of course you are not right ... I've already stated before that I am the only person here who is right!

Everyone else is merely correct! ;) Then again ... I have an inferiority complex ... I know you are all inferior to me.

 

Actually ... I read the bit I quoted above and having just watched the new Star Trek movie on DVD I first read it as "no need to 'boldly go'" ... and thought we had strayed back into the Pedants' group again.

Posted (edited)
Wow. Admitting your not always right.

 

Give me a minute to recover from my stagger and dizziness at reading such an informative revelation!

 

He did not admit he was wrong, just that he knows he is. ;) Probably a conflict he has learned to deal with on a daily basis.

Edited by RingOfFlame
Posted
Actually ... I read the bit I quoted above and having just watched the new Star Trek movie on DVD I first read it as "no need to 'boldly go'" ... and thought we had strayed back into the Pedants' group again.

 

Haha, I learned the error of my ways when I used a split infinitive in front of my boss. Lets just say, I try hard to avoid making the same mistake again. (Although, this does depend on how much sleep I've had etc...)

Posted
Please report any incidences of bad language that you see in order to help the mods who cannot spend their lives searching every post and do their best to police the site.

 

As Domino said, it is under discussion at the moment and so please let things lie until decisions have been made

 

This is the type of thing which frustrates me here...

1) If a topic like this is up for discussion it should be "discussed" with members/supporters not behind closed doors.

2) If the subject is under discussion, i.e. no decision has been made, why are ad-hoc and biased actions being taken which are not being consistently applied?

 

I don't blame ringofflame for feeling miffed. I think that is completely understandable. The initial post in this thread is also completely appropriate and doesn't deserve the disregard it has got from some replies.

  • Thanks 3
Posted
He did not admit he was wrong, just that he knows he is. ;) Probably a conflict he has learned to deal with on a daily basis.

 

Daily? Nah, every few minutes - I am male after all! Isn't it taught to all men that we're just wrong?

Posted
This is the type of thing which frustrates me here...

1) If a topic like this is up for discussion it should be "discussed" with members/supporters not behind closed doors.

2) If the subject is under discussion, i.e. no decision has been made, why are ad-hoc and biased actions being taken which are not being consistently applied?

 

I don't blame ringofflame for feeling miffed. I think that is completely understandable. The initial post in this thread is also completely appropriate and doesn't deserve the disregard it has got from some replies.

 

One point. Edugeek is not a democracy. Never has been. This has been pointed out in the past. We have to accept that or find somewhere else to hang out.

  • Thanks 3
Posted

It is not possible to spend time going through all the old posts and removing words which are considered offensive or unneeded on a professional forum, however if an old thread is ressurected and someone reports and instance of a particular word in that thread then it will be looked at.

 

The occurence that ROF reported today has been dealt with.

 

Ben

Posted
One point. Edugeek is not a democracy. Never has been. This has been pointed out in the past. We have to accept that or find somewhere else to hang out.

 

No, I'm sorry - that is completely the wrong attitude to have!

 

This place exists as a resource for thousands of like-minded individuals in similar roles. It has developed in to a community where we try and help each other - in some cases go out of our way to do so.

The "ownership" of the site doesn't concern me (which is where this discussion usually goes!) - If Dos_Box ultimately decides to do something one way which I have a huge problem with then yes, it would influence my decision on whether or not to continue using it.

 

The thing is, and I'm more than willing to be corrected by him, I would guess that Dos_Box doesn't want to make sweeping changes which have a negative impact on what EduGeek has evolved in to. To ensure that this doesn't happen, on largely non-critical issues, it makes sense to have the decency to ask or consult with the community which use (and in some cases support) the product which pays his salary...

Call it what you will, but that would be more like a democracy than a dictatorship!

  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...