timbo343 Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 We need to replace the Buffalo NAS enclosures that use for our onsite backups now that SMB1 is no longer been supported. We have the Synology DS916+ 8Gb with WD Red drives and we are happy with it however i'd like to know what the QNAP alternative is like (i guess its the QNAP TS-453A-8G). Can anyone give their opinions please. Thanks
JordanT91 Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 Synology for me as well. I much prefer it over our first NAS which is a QNAP. 1
synaesthesia Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 Both are generally held in high esteem, but we favour the Synology boxes, great UI and lots of options. Very very reliable too. 1
TechMonkey Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 I've not used QNAP but we are Synology throughout and even bought one for home. The only annoyance I have found is it does nag about RAID scrubbing but there is no way to automate this process so you have to manually set it off. Rock solid otherwise. 1
mikkydoos Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 I wouldn't re buy Qnap again for big NAS's. Disk performance isn't quick and the networking is pretty slow. Little unstable too. Too many features too -- too much going on for just a storage box. 1
3s-gtech Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 My experiences with Synology have been excellent - I've ordered three more to replace our defunct models. 1
ITGURU Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 Do they all support iscsi to extend a windows server storage? how would performance compare to local attached drives when using iscsi?
3s-gtech Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 Couldn't say if they all do - certainly my DS1513+ and DS214 do.
mrwoberts Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 (edited) The only annoyance I have found is it does nag about RAID scrubbing but there is no way to automate this process so you have to manually set it off. That's what I thought, until I googled and googled and this came out. When I set it up they didn't have the option in Task Scheduler for custom scripts but now they do, so implementing this script is now a lot easier - just drop it in your sysadmin share and point the task to it. ..Here's the clip I saved from the website where the code came from. cat /proc/mdstat cat /sys/block/md2/md/sync_action mdadm --detail /dev/md2 echo check > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_action ;;echo repair > /sys/block/md2/md/sync_action I am late to this thread and have not read it all. However, I run a simple script in the Task Scheduler to scrub every month. I set up 3 User Defined Tasks, each with login as root, and a run command of: /usr/local/myscript/sync_action.sh mdx - where the x in mdx is either 0, 1 or 2. This checks all volumes - 2 hidden and one user - simply add more tasks if you have more volumes. Then set the schedule to whatever you want. I have a monthly schedule to run once a day every month at 22:00. The sync_action.sh script is: --------------------- #!/bin/sh DEVICE=$1 if [ -z "$DEVICE" ]; then echo "Missing argument DEVICE. Eg: md0 md1, md2, etc." 1>&2 exit fi CHECKING=`/bin/cat /proc/mdstat | /bin/grep -A2 $DEVICE | /bin/grep check` if [ -z "$CHECKING" ]; then echo check > /sys/block/$DEVICE/md/sync_action echo "Performing data scrubbing on device $DEVICE now." else echo "Data scrubbing on device $DEVICE in progress." fi --------------------- Edited May 22, 2017 by mrwoberts Formatting keeps messing up. 1
mrwoberts Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 +1 for Synology by the way. I even like the way it can pass on the UPS to other Synology devices, and shut them down when the battery gets to a certain point.
MatthewL Posted May 22, 2017 Posted May 22, 2017 I have QNAP at home, a TS-420 and TS-119P II. I cannot fault them at all (touch wood), Synology does appear to be cheaper, feature wise I could find little difference just cost from my point of view.
bossman Posted May 23, 2017 Posted May 23, 2017 We have been using Synology for the past 2 - 3 years, I love the SSD caching feature so you can mix your drives, lots of other features too many to mention which are all fantastic, I wouldn't hesitate to purchase Synology over Qnap. Just to add yesterday I had Veeam support on a remote session and he commented on how fast our setup was and asked which SAN back end we were using, when I told him he was really impressed, Synology RS3614xs+ x 3 clustered with HA, sweet 😉 Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using EduGeek mobile app
Davit2005 Posted May 23, 2017 Posted May 23, 2017 Synology +1, experienced QNAP a few years back now so can't comment like. AD authentication, quotas, SSD cache for read/write on some models (2 SSD's required for write), Backup to Azure or other cloud storage, etc.. Currently using as a NAS and FTP server for PBX backups.
SLS_ Posted May 23, 2017 Posted May 23, 2017 I've used both, def. recommend Synology. QNAP often went down & support was terrible. Synology has yet to fail (14mths & counting).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now