Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Stargate would be better as a movie franchise alone now I reckon. They've done all that can as a TV series.

 

I want something completely new. Our more Firefly...

Posted

Yes Firefly too... spot on Tony! Just about everyone ever says that.

 

Nooo.....

 

Firefly is the "Faulty Towers" of Sci-Fi, a bit like the orginal Battlestar Galagtica. They are soo, good and soo memerable because of their short runs. If Firefly had made it past 3 seasons (ok didn't get past 1) it would have quickly turned into another TNG/DS9/SG1 clone.

 

Maybe a short one off mini series would do?

 

As for Heroes - Yeah, wouldn't mind giving a new series a go. I actually enjoyed it the first time round.

Posted
Wish they'd bring Star Trek back - in the new timeline / reboot format!

 

I think there is talk of this, and with all the stars that are there now...

Posted

Interesting... I liked Heroes.

 

It got a bit silly towards the end, but I think that was due the the writer's strike forcing them into a corner story-wise.

Posted

I did enjoy the cheerleader, but like Lost it got dragged out far too much.

 

If its anything like the awful tomorrow People that's just come out run for the hills

Posted

How they originally planned for the Heroes Season 2 story arc before the writers strike was far better than what they ended up doing. It's all storyboarded out on the special features of the S2 DVD.

 

If they go that kind of route I'll be happy, as I think Heroes never actually reached it's potential.

 

Regarding other shows, I would like to see more Firefly (Joss is such a good writer that it would be fine for a few seasons). A new Trek could be interesting, there's currently a kickstarter project in post production, for a new pilot episode, featuring a few old cast members.

 

There's no good scifi right now though. The Battlestar remake was the last truly great piece of space drama, it's all been pretty quiet since.

Posted

What I never understood is why Hollywood (and whever the TV Co's are based) insist on the constant remakes and "remimagings"?

 

There must be 100's, if not 1000's, of quality original Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels out there that could be adapted. Look at Game of Thrones and Walking Dead for instance.

Posted (edited)

Problem with SciFi/Fantasy is that it costs a whole lot more to produce than your standard drama. Everything needs creating from the ground up unlike your typical crime drama where you could just pop to the shops for costumes and get a lot of fake blood.

 

So if you're investing in such a show you want it to be a Game of Thrones / Battlestar Galactice 2003, and not Heroes (season 3/3) or SGU (no viewers). Or you'll never get your money back.

 

Edit:

 

Also most fantasy novels and series have an awesome scope spread acorss several books. It takes balls to back something for such a long period. I think That the Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan would make a fantastic fantasy TV series, but you'd find it hard to get a studio to back a series to cover all 14 books IMO.

Edited by ICTDirect_Dave
Posted

So if you're investing in such a show you want it to be a Game of Thrones / Battlestar Galactice 2003, and not Heroes (season 3/3) or SGU (no viewers). Or you'll never get your money back.

 

 

And yet it's interesting to see the number of series that get prematurely cancelled due to poor US ratings (often down to very bad scheduling) only to go and do well in syndicate, international and DVD markets.

 

It'd be interesting to see if the success of Netflix's House of Cards has any impact on this immediate results mentality.

Posted
Problem with SciFi/Fantasy is that it costs a whole lot more to produce than your standard drama. Everything needs creating from the ground up unlike your typical crime drama where you could just pop to the shops for costumes and get a lot of fake blood.

 

So if you're investing in such a show you want it to be a Game of Thrones / Battlestar Galactice 2003, and not Heroes (season 3/3) or SGU (no viewers). Or you'll never get your money back.

 

Edit:

 

Also most fantasy novels and series have an awesome scope spread acorss several books. It takes balls to back something for such a long period. I think That the Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan would make a fantastic fantasy TV series, but you'd find it hard to get a studio to back a series to cover all 14 books IMO.

 

I'm not sure that's entirely true. Props aren't *that* expensive to build, and they get reused constantly throughout a show. Look at something like Firefly - most scenes were on their ship set. So, location shooting is relatively limited - and when they do a location, they choose a random bit of desert so have low costs in terms of shutting roads etc... Not to mention, the costumes are pretty constant too - you don't have lots of costume changes 'day to day' (hence signature looks like the brown coat in Firefly).

 

The expensive bit as far as I can tell is the CGI. Done right, CGI costs a fortune. However, once the 3D models of ships are built, its a lot cheaper to reuse them in new scenes.

Posted
Blake's Seven... to be remade... say no more

 

Begging to b done i'd say! I love the original, the story was fantastic and it was brutal for the time.

 

However, who doesn't want to see the Liberator in beautiful CGI? I know I do. And providing they keep the serious outlook and grim reality that the crew face I think it'd be a hit. :)

Posted (edited)
I'm not sure that's entirely true. Props aren't *that* expensive to build, and they get reused constantly throughout a show. Look at something like Firefly - most scenes were on their ship set. So, location shooting is relatively limited - and when they do a location, they choose a random bit of desert so have low costs in terms of shutting roads etc... Not to mention, the costumes are pretty constant too - you don't have lots of costume changes 'day to day' (hence signature looks like the brown coat in Firefly).

 

The expensive bit as far as I can tell is the CGI. Done right, CGI costs a fortune. However, once the 3D models of ships are built, its a lot cheaper to reuse them in new scenes.

 

Totally agree with this, if the idea behind the show is sound you can get away with a limited budget. CGI 3D models of ships can be left for future seasons when the show has taken off. See Red Dwarf

 

While we are listing show we would like to see back I would like another series of Paradox from the BBC. Mostly because my wife really enjoyed it, and she is not normally a fan of Sci-fi

Edited by JJonas
Posted (edited)
I did enjoy the cheerleader, but like Lost it got dragged out far too much.

 

If its anything like the awful tomorrow People that's just come out run for the hills

 

watched the first few episodes of that and then just gave in it diddnt seem to be going anywhere almost felt like a cut down version of heroes crossed with tmnt where everyone had the same powers and lived in the sewer

 

What I never understood is why Hollywood (and whever the TV Co's are based) insist on the constant remakes and "remimagings"?

 

There must be 100's, if not 1000's, of quality original Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels out there that could be adapted. Look at Game of Thrones and Walking Dead for instance.

 

yes but if you release a say star trek/gate series you have a premade audience at least for the first 1/2 season even if its utter pap and there is less need to generate hype as fans will do that way before it ever airs

 

Totally agree with this, if the idea behind the show is sound you can get away with a limited budget. CGI 3D models of ships can be left for future seasons when the show has taken off. See Red Dwarf

 

While we are listing show we would like to see back I would like another series of Paradox from the BBC. Mostly because my wife really enjoyed it, and she is not normally a fan of Sci-fi

 

red dward is an oddball though as at least imo its not sci-fi as much as a sitcom that happens to be set in space

Edited by sted
Posted

Please don't be carp please don't be carp please don't be carp

 

I loved the first season, absolutely adored it, but after that it dropped off remarkably fast. As I understand it the original plan was to have a whole new cast of Heroes every season, but then they got so successful in their first run that they bottled it and invented some rubbish new arc with the existing characters. Add in the aforementioned Writers' Strike... (remember Peter's Irish girlfriend? Got abandoned in the disease-ridden apocalypse future and never mentioned again? That was because of the strike.)

 

I also think I would break a great many laws and morals for the guarantee of new Firefly, though I fear too many threads were cut short in Serenity for it to be worth bringing back - the original run had enough mysteries for four or five seasons.

Posted

Tomorrows people was awful. The concept seemed cool, almost an Xmen quality too it, but it got generic and samey and I haven't watched beyond episode 3 it bored me that much.

 

Take Arrow - not exactly SciFi, but it is a show which for the 1st season had a shoestring budget, season 2 had much more of a budget so they could afford to do a lot more, and season 3s budget is expected to surpass season 1 and 2 combined. It tried to stay "real" but still based on the comics, and now is delving into proper superhero abilities (Mirakuru, Deathstroke, The Flash) and has opened up for the Flash to start soon as well. The DC universe will stand in better stead being like this show than film based and I can imagine stretching to batman and hopefully Superman and Green Lantern.

 

Look at other SciFi, SGU - ended terribly, season 2 was too stretched out, ended on a poor cliffhanger. Heroes quality dropped to the point we were glad it ended. Alphas should have been renewed but wasn't of which I am gutted.

Posted
Begging to b done i'd say! I love the original, the story was fantastic and it was brutal for the time.

 

However, who doesn't want to see the Liberator in beautiful CGI? I know I do. And providing they keep the serious outlook and grim reality that the crew face I think it'd be a hit. :)

 

I loved it too. It was dark. Very dark. I think if it were done it needs the same tone, a game of thrones darkness to it. And yes the liberator in CGI... :eek:

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...