Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

 

A friend of mine working in another school chewed my ear off the other day about how his management team wouldn't give him capital to deploy wireless and that he believes 90% of secondary schools out there have a pervasive wireless system. I'd tend to disagree and say that the number would be a lot lower, I would create a poll but not sure how!

 

If we say there are 3 options -

 

1. no wireless,

2. basic/limited/low quality wireless (lower end solutions such as netgear)

3. Enterprise class pervasive wireless

 

Would be great to hear from guys at secondary schools in particular as to where you are at?

 

Cheers :)

Posted
Currently 2, looking to move to 2/3. (Not sure where you'd slap Unifi kit - I'd like to say 3 however some people in the game (probably those losing money from not fitting it) would clearly argue that!)
Posted
I work in a large primary school (724 pupils and 85 staff) and we are somewhere between 2 and 3 using Netgear ProSafe products. 16x WNDAP350s and ProSafe AP-16 wireless manager. For the most part it has been a case of set it up and forget it - works a treat.
Posted

1st question is why does he want it.

 

Laptops are a pain in the neck so push for more fixed I.T. ;)

 

2ndly

 

we are stage 3.

 

Before my time

1913-1998 no wireless

in my time

1998-2003 no wireless (Stage1)

2003-2008 50 dumb 3Com Access points. (Stage2)

2008-2011 Cisco LWAP on 4400Wlanc (Stage3a)

2001-date Meru single channel solution (Stage3b)

 

Rob

Posted
We're a 800 pupil secondary and firmly in the Stage 2 but might as well be Stage 1 for all the support it gets catagory. We desporately need to move into Stage 3 and think about netbooks, tablets and BYOD. Money's there for a managed WiFi setup if someone could justify it...
Posted

Mid to Large secondary (approx. 1300 students) and I'd say we were more stage 2 than 3. No centrally managed solution but Cisco AP 1230/1240's throughout the school giving complete coverage. Using about 36 access points to give no flat spots. It all works great apart from 1) its only 802.11g and 2) each access point is individually configured. Not my choice but you do what you can when cash is available.

 

Not prepared for BYOD situations yet, it copes with staff laptops and their day to day work but adding student machines would bring it crashing down :(

Posted

Every school I have worked for in the last 10 years has been at stage 3 within a year.

 

Trapeze (1:1 in 2003 140 devices total)

 

Extreme/Hi-Path (staff 1:1 140 devices, sixth form 1:1 140 devices, yr7-11 120 devices)

 

Meru (staff 1:1 120 devices, BYOD 20 devices, yr7-13 150 Devices)

 

Each time very much set it up and forget it, except for the crop of dodgy' n' drivers from just about every manufacturer 2009-2011. Teachers and admin staff have the wireless as their default connection, it has had a revolutionary impact on the way they use technology to meet the demands of their roles. Students have started to complain log on takes too long, but they are comparing it to the speed at which a personal tablet becomes ready for use. We are looking at moving to a 1:1 programme which may require some (probably only 10) additional APs in the highest density areas (e.g. the Humanities where they already make heavy use of laptops multimedia and internet sources at present . That said the traffic from 1:1 devices has a completely different profile to that of a shared device, so a proper detailed analysis is needed, and the Senior Team need to **really** understand how 1:1 can be a driver for improving student attainment before that happens)

Posted
This is all really good stuff thanks guys, aiming for 100 replies so it gives me a good sample size!! Nice to see lots of 2's trying to move to 3's because thats where both me and my friend are right now, maybe i'f my management team knew everyone else was doing it they would let me!!
Posted
This is all really good stuff thanks guys, aiming for 100 replies so it gives me a good sample size!! Nice to see lots of 2's trying to move to 3's because thats where both me and my friend are right now, maybe i'f my management team knew everyone else was doing it they would let me!!

 

As I alluded to above, the bit we've struggled with here is the rationale for making the change. We can put a managed WiFi in tomorrow, we just wouldn't use it. The starting point is the schools ICT vision. How does the SLT envisage IT being used in the school. If they are looking to go out and purchase loads of laptops, or are looking at 1:1 or BYOD then you have your reason to spend on the wireless infrastructure.

 

£30k is a lot of money just so teachers can use their laptops wirelessly. Especially when every desk in the school has a hardwired point.

Posted
As I alluded to above, the bit we've struggled with here is the rationale for making the change. We can put a managed WiFi in tomorrow, we just wouldn't use it. The starting point is the schools ICT vision. How does the SLT envisage IT being used in the school. If they are looking to go out and purchase loads of laptops, or are looking at 1:1 or BYOD then you have your reason to spend on the wireless infrastructure.

 

£30k is a lot of money just so teachers can use their laptops wirelessly. Especially when every desk in the school has a hardwired point.

 

Yeah same here, I think they are also seeing if BYOD could potentially save them money in the long run in terms of buying in devices. I think it is more of a case of when rather than if though

Posted

There's are probably 3 or 4 different levels within option 3.

 

As tmcd35 points out, you should not be starting with vendor choice first.

 

The first point should always be to outline your goals for the WiFi, for now, for 3 years from now and for 5 years from now. What do you want the user experience to be ? Browsing ? Streaming ? Voip ? (determines data rate and throughput). How many devices will you support (determines throughput, capacity and most important, and often overlooked, how many access points you truly need). These and lots of other questions you need to ask, (security, redundancy, manageability...) would give you your overall specification.

 

Next is how much money you have to spend overall for a complete solution, to the point where it's signed off. Make a distinction between install cost and running cost.

 

Finally, you need to set a date for completion.

 

Now, these three points of the project, time, specification and scope, represent three points of a triangle. Slap bang in the middle is the point we call "quality". The closer you get to any one of the points, the more it takes you away from the other two. Quality suffers.

 

The trick is to balance the three points and, most impotantly, INSTALL THE SOLUTION THAT WILL MEET YOUR STATED OBJECTIVES FOT THE 1 YR, 3YR AND 5 YR PERIOD.

 

Once you determine the specification, budget and cost, and do everything you can to keep each of those equally catered for, you will find some vendors jump out at you, others fall by the wayside.

 

You can have basic wifi with very cheap access points, with 802.1x authentication on a single managed vlan and you will be just fine. Cheap, but not feature rich.

If you want more features, raise the budget. If the budget stops, prioritise the features - for example, do you need a redundant controller or can you live with 24hr downtime while you have a warranty replacemnt ?

 

It's all about the planning, get that right and the solution falls into place. Be wary of selecting a particular vendor just because it's a popular choice. WiFi is wiFi, WiFi alliance certified devices are tested and certified as interoperable with other wifi devices. enterprise class equipment (option3 on your list) differentiates by additional feature sets and unique selling points - that's what you pay for, but why would you if you don't need them ? And as has been stated, many people here are running very successful wifi at low cost, precisely as they don't have the need for more advanced features.

 

My overall advice to anyone looking at the enterprise class networks is that money spent early on with a neutral, professional WLAN designer/engineer will save you more in the long run - because they will help you get the network that you need to match your objectives.

 

NM

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I have 200+ laptops, wifi printers, etc. I use 28 Dlink 3200APs 54Mbp G standard only. The are what were called smart access points (they don't need a central controller) Than can be administered from a single program but really only to clone settings. so a 2.5 solution.

 

They are rock solid enterprise class APs and plenum rated. 7 Years old and still working!

Posted
1400 on roll Secondary School here - we're level 3, having just had a Xirrus install. Previous to that we had a centrally controlled 3com nightmare setup. 'Twas awful.
Posted

Peter, try asking again but this time ask people to comment not only what vendor they selected, but also WHY they chose that vendor. That should be more revealing.

 

You should always start with your requirements, vendor selection much later.

 

NM

Posted (edited)
Would be great to hear from guys at secondary schools in particular as to where you are at?

 

We're a prep school - Ruckus controller and access points, not too expensive (under £10,000 for the complete system) but it seems to work just fine for what we've done with it so far (number 3 on your list). We've had 20 or so laptops at a time in a classroom with no problem, and we have people wander in and out of the building during the day using the wireless network. There was a thread with neilmac a week or two ago where we discussed wireless location systems - track individual wireless devices around the school (asset management) and/or electronic tags for visitors. It's a feature that I think our school in particular would find very useful, and it's another feature to bear in mind if you're looking at buying a wieless system.

Edited by dhicks
Posted

Secondary. 2/3 I think.

 

We have/had CISCO WAP's which were installed before my time to give site wide cover for teacher laptops. We then started deploying laptop trolleys, which proved problematic in supporting the density of devices that could accumulate within an area. For years chatter has been about 1:1 devices, so we put in place a strategic programme to move from the unmanaged CISO WAPS, to a managed system which could support (in theory!) the required device density. In our case we choose MERU. We are 2 years into what was a 3/4 year programme, but we will probably pull forward the remaining work to complete the changeover by next summer.

 

IMO @neilmac's advice is good. Difficult to actually follow but good!

Posted (edited)
...ask people to comment not only what vendor they selected, but also WHY they chose that vendor. That should be more revealing.

 

In every case I chose the platform that a 'Solution Architect'(*) I had developed a good working relationship with, and a strong respect for, who demonstrated a holistic understanding of what we were trying to achieve, recommended (and yes they were part of the sales team that would land the order). Different Solution Architect/Company each time. Happy customer.

 

I gloss over the one I'm not allowed to talk about, but if you put a negative in front of each of those statements you can imagine (if you like) how it turned out.

 

 

(*)One of them was a low four digit CCIE and he sold me Chantry/Extreme kit with the AutoCell plugin.

Edited by psydii

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...