Jump to content

petertec

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

20 Excellent

About petertec

  1. Why don't you just specify an acceptable pervasive db level within the tender and then the emphasis is on the supplier to meet that regardless of the technology they are proposing. Give building plans but make sure that they are aware of any structural concerns/anomalies. Most suppliers will assume a 10/15% contingency for a tender based on predictive surveying and anyone worth their salt will more than likely incorporate a physical survey into their tender response.
  2. For me Ubiquiti isn't in the same league as Aruba, Meru, Extreme etc. I would place it somewhere between those guys and the really basic solutions such as Netgear. Fine for a small primary maybe but to me 1400 students and a one to one BYOD policy means that these are the solutions that need to be looked at. When you think of the additional functionality that these solutions offer in terms of Network access control and Network management then they are the better long term option. It depends on the context and the individual needs of the school but there is no doubt there is a massive difference in quality and obviously that brings with it a cost difference as well.
  3. 1400 students and BYOD would mean you would probably want to look at the true enterprise class wireless products and stay away from the likes of Ubiquiti etc. I would be talking to people like Aruba, Meru and Extreme. Also for most schools pervasive AC is going to be overkill. I would say that a predominantly N environment with maybe AC in the particularly dense areas would suffice.
  4. Hi all, One of the vendors I have worked with in the past (Enterasys) has just been acquired by Extreme. I always liked Enterasys and their tech but I've never worked with Extreme and am obviously a little nervous with the acquisition. Can anyone give me some feedback on Extreme in terms of tech and also support and service please. Cheers!
  5. also from what I can tell at the moment ac AP's are typically close to double the cost of n AP's.
  6. Really no need to go AC pervasively in a school environment. Maybe in particular areas you could put in the odd AC access point but your surely not going to need to go AC across the site? People seem to be buying into AC far too much too early! In fact in many cases you will actually need more ac ap's than n ap's to achieve the same levels of coverage as ac only works on the 5ghz range and beamforming becomes a bit of a problem in dense environments. Also bear in mind that the second generation of ac ap's are going to require 2 gigabit ports! N isn't going to transition to AC overnight - it's going to take years - to jump from a pervasive 11n deployment to 11ac right now is overkill.
  7. There does seem to be grey area between BYOD and MDM. MDM is more of a private sector product definitely - yet to see a use case in a school to be honest. Any decent wired/wireless vendor should be able to provide what you are trying to achieve without having to partner with Airwatch/MobileIron etc.
  8. Ah my thread is sinking without trace, didn't get anywhere near 50 responses lol
  9. Yeah same here, I think they are also seeing if BYOD could potentially save them money in the long run in terms of buying in devices. I think it is more of a case of when rather than if though
  10. This is all really good stuff thanks guys, aiming for 100 replies so it gives me a good sample size!! Nice to see lots of 2's trying to move to 3's because thats where both me and my friend are right now, maybe i'f my management team knew everyone else was doing it they would let me!!
  11. Hi all, A friend of mine working in another school chewed my ear off the other day about how his management team wouldn't give him capital to deploy wireless and that he believes 90% of secondary schools out there have a pervasive wireless system. I'd tend to disagree and say that the number would be a lot lower, I would create a poll but not sure how! If we say there are 3 options - 1. no wireless, 2. basic/limited/low quality wireless (lower end solutions such as netgear) 3. Enterprise class pervasive wireless Would be great to hear from guys at secondary schools in particular as to where you are at? Cheers
  12. there are other solutions out there that do the same with regards to authentication and that continue to function if the controller goes down. thats why I say I'm not sure why Aerohive focus on it so much? Virtual controllers from other manufacturers aren't exactly pricey anymore either so I'm not sure what the value of Aerohive is? How much is the Hive Manager roughly??
  13. I don't understand why Aerohive is pitched as controller-less? Hive Manager is surely just a virtual controller - much like lots of other options in the market? Seems like their whole pitch is based on a marketing spin?
  14. Sorry didn't see the link first time around. Surprising that Aerohive doesn't have their own solution really. Cant say I have ever evaluated Lightspeed but I know BCM tends to be pretty pricey
  15. Look at Enterasys, both their wireless and NAC look pretty sound. They seem to go under the radar for some reason but I think we will be seriously giving them some consideration. Used to be called Cabletron who i'm told (think I might be a bit too young) predate the mighty cisco!! @mark100 - what is Aerohive's NAC solution called?? Have you taken a look at it?
×
×
  • Create New...