Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Going to make this brief (only giving myself a short break here) but debating buying a new car.

 

I'm 28 so midlife crisis isn't really looming just yet, and looking towards something with a bit of beans to it now that I'm not 17 anymore and obviously an uninsurable mass-murderer in the waiting.

 

I'd basically like something that fills the following crietria:

 

-< insurance group 19.

 

-0-60mph < 6.7 secs (very important) OR can be modified to such, without breaking any other conditions.

 

-Mpg hopefully not < 20.

 

-No more modern than the new car tax brackets (so looking at up to late nineties

cars.)

 

-No more than £3000 .

 

 

I don't plan on owning it longer than 18 months so won't service it, just fix what ever goes wrong.

 

So far my choices seem to be:

 

Toyota Supra mk3 3.0 turbo/2.5 twin turbo

http://members.optusnet.com.au/supra80/generalma70/images/DSC00336.jpg

 

Nissan 300 zx

http://www.cars-directory.net/pics/nissan/300zx/1991/nissan_300zx_901329.jpg

 

Honda Prelude (motegi)

http://www.carfolio.com/images/dbimages/zgas/models/id/15125/1996_honda_prelude_si.jpg

 

Mitsubishi FTO (would change/uprate filter, sparks and decent but not loud exhaust)

http://www.diseno-art.com/images/mitsubishi_FTO.jpg

 

Favourite is the Supra tbh.

 

Just wanted as many opinions as possible! Any thoughts appreciated, as well as any cautionary tales and horror stories. Thanks for reading. :)

Posted

I'd go for a good condition Saab 900 turbo, not fast, but then where I am not much room for gassing it, and they look hella coooo

Becoming bit of a cult classic though so probably cost more than they're worth.

 

FTO is a good choice, heard good things about them

Posted

 

-0-60mph < 6.7 secs (very important) OR can be modified to such, without breaking any other conditions.

 

Let me guess, you're getting beaten in a traffic light drag race by a car that does 0-60 in 6.8 secs :p

Posted
C20XE

 

Someone a Vauxhall fan there? Lol. Any Vauxhall engine is pretty tuneable. The Astra I had I think it's engine code was Z16XE and I had a Performance Vauxhall mag that had a 300BHP Astra with an almost identical engine.

 

Incidentally I was tempted to buy the bolt-on turbo kit that was advertised to give about 40% more power from a bog-standard engine.

Posted

Oooh thanks guys. And Disaster, strong username. :)

 

Hehe, yeah my nemesis is infact a PE teacher with an Audi TT - can't even write this stuff. Anyway that's about 7-8% of the reason and I don't drive like a lunatic tbh, just want the option. :p

 

I'll look into bolting bits onto Vauxhalls - did DESPARATELY want a Calibra turbo but they're all knackered now it seems. :( Mitsubishi GTO was a consideration, but they're very mechanically complicated and prone to giving you the old death so I'm avoiding those. The 200sx is a handsome car but stock is a bit slow, and I've heard many tales of the sump falling out if you do anything daft like turn a corner in it.

 

Keep having this INSANE idea about buying a cheap-ish Jaguar XJ and just putting an Arden-esque bodykit on it. Someone talk me out of that plox! :p

 

Cheers very much for the replies so far folks. :)

Posted

Hmm. Supra / 300zx = heavy chestwig 80's tastic and cost a fair wack to run.

Prelude / FTO = two of the best FWD cars made but still RWD is where it's at if you want a sports car.

 

 

My vote: Nissan 200sx S14 or S14a.

 

Amazing cars for the money. Proper mans sports car, turbocharged, RWD, cheap to buy run and insure, 0-60 in the 6's as standard and more importantly are very cheap and easy to mod. You can go from 200 to 300 horse power for about £500 extra.

 

I've had a few and loved them and miss them still.

 

Butuz

Posted

Ha, this is my favourite topic, and I always give the same recommendation - MR2 Turbo (hence the username!). Fits the bill apart from insurance, but you're older than me and I am only paying £400 or so a year to insure it.

 

The rev3 cars and later are better, they're tuneable, handle well, reliable, and there's a massive wealth of very cheap parts available.

Posted (edited)

MR2 Turbo ftw :nod: 0-60 in a second less than your spec.

 

You could even go for a MR2 N/A beams engine (1999-2001 iirc) which gives you around 7seconds standard without the hassle and driving style considerations of a turbo

Edited by Guest
Posted

BEAMS may be over budget though, quite sought after ;)

 

I can confirm it's a quick car, though I've never tested its limits really. Some advantages over the NA include a better gearbox, optional LSD, bigger brakes and ARBs on early ones.

 

C20LET plus Mini = understeer and fiery death. Fun though, apparently.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...