Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just get the following error.

Have you tried setting the edition within the OS itself? e.g.

 

dism.exe /online /Set-Edition:ServerDatacenter /AcceptEula /ProductKey:CB7KF-BWN84-R7R2Y-793K2-8XDDG

Posted
Looks like the Keys are MAK only at the moment, will a KMS key for Svr 2016 be released or is it a case of asking for it?

 

Pete

 

Unfortunately you always have to ask for a KMS key now.

Posted
Looks like the Keys are MAK only at the moment, will a KMS key for Svr 2016 be released or is it a case of asking for it?

 

Pete

 

Unfortunately you always have to ask for a KMS key now.

 

Indeed you do need to ask for it. Just phone this number and they will sort you out - 0800 9179016

Posted

I've sent an email to [email protected] which I found in my email from January 2016 when I requested KMS for Windows 10. I've got a stinking cold right now so can't even hear myself properly at the moment! lol!

 

I've got a shiny new server on order and am sooo tempted to get this on it from the start. Playing with the eval look good.

 

Pete

Posted

Yah, within the hour I've got a response from Microsoft - it says officially is not being made until October but have made the KMS key available in my VLSC !!! :) Great stuff. Now, as @Tefters says, will I be able to add it to my KMS server without it needing a patch? I'll wait until next week I think before trying, it's Friday afternoon after all!

 

Pete

Posted
Yah, within the hour I've got a response from Microsoft - it says officially is not being made until October but have made the KMS key available in my VLSC !!! :) Great stuff. Now, as @Tefters says, will I be able to add it to my KMS server without it needing a patch? I'll wait until next week I think before trying, it's Friday afternoon after all!

 

Pete

 

Installed on the KMS server fine, slmgr /upk > slmgr.vbs /ipk xxxxxxx > slmgr.vbs /ato = success

 

Now to just force some clients to activate to finally kick in, will let you know.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
I agree with others - why release an Evaluation ISO and not the actual ISOs? I wonder if they're going to include the latest October patches (due 11th October), but I'd be surprised if this were the case, or if it were something serious?
Posted

So having just sat down to mock up my first 2016 RDS session host I thought I would start by adding the Desktop Experience feature, guess what's missing from the add-feature list, it just isn't there!

 

So there's the first crucial missing part in the eval...

Posted (edited)
You looked at Personal Session Desktops? It's basically Windows 10.

 

The Microsoft Platform: NEW RDS deployment model: Personal Session Desktops!

 

Steve

 

Having just read the article that's purely just a MS change to cover licensing and allow VDI in Azure, has nothing to do with the Desktop Experience feature other than the mention of it being improved.

Last time i tested TP 4 or 5 (cant remember which) the feature was still there, this time in the Eval there physically isn't a User Interface option. Why they would of removed it from Eval is beyond me?!

 

Also due to the Graphical User Interface main options missing from the feature list you cannot remove and add the GUI on the fly.

Edited by Tefters
Posted
Having just read the article that's purely just a MS change to cover licensing and allow VDI in Azure, has nothing to do with the Desktop Experience feature other than the mention of it being improved.

 

What is it that you're missing from them that you think the Desktop Experience would give you? Last time I looked had everything that people normally use. Sound/Tool wise (Bearing in mind this is Windows 10 so a lot of the "7ish" stuff doesn't exist anyway)

 

Unless I'm missing something :s

 

Steve

Posted
So i'm at a loss as to whether they have decided last minute to pull the feature completely and it is now just on/off at install ?

 

I feel we're talking about two different options though :s

 

That's the actual server host with Desktop Experience like old school Session Host, I'm talking Personal Session Hosts which are effectively each user gets their own session-host that's acting almost Win10 ish think VDI wise

 

Steve

Posted

I can confirm it's no longer in the feature list, and not even available as a powershell "install-windowsfeature" option.

 

Although it does say Desktop Experience when you select the OS in setup, so maybe its now baked in?

Posted (edited)

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server-docs/get-started/installation-options-for-windows-server-2016-technical-preview

 

They sneakily updated Technet and warn its all gone.

 

There is now just Core, GUI and Nano which has to be chosen at install. Uninstalling and re-installing GUI's introduced in 2012 is now gone again.

 

So just like the full screen metro start menu that Microsoft decided to U-Turn on so have they with installing/uninstalling GUI's on servers.

Edited by Tefters
Posted

I've never quite understood why not installing the GUI reduces the surface of attack? How many GUI (Desktop Experience) flaws have there been in recent times?

 

I'd always recommend installing the Desktop Experience as well as RSAT, then focus on using RSAT as much as possible for day to day tasks.

Posted
I've never quite understood why not installing the GUI reduces the surface of attack? How many GUI (Desktop Experience) flaws have there been in recent times?

 

I'd always recommend installing the Desktop Experience as well as RSAT, then focus on using RSAT as much as possible for day to day tasks.

 

No GUI does speed things up drastically and requires less resources. I have always been in the same boat as yourself up til now and will be pushing a few servers like DC's etc... over to no GUI

Posted
But we're in the age of multi-core or more processors and 8GB+ memory as standard on a basic server. The GUI can't be that demanding on resources! I just think the argument is somewhat flawed - it's still Windows in the background and can't be compared to the likes of Linux. Web providers still favour Linux due to its open source code and low overhead, but removing the Desktop Experience can't speed the server up that drastically surely? Please prove me wrong someone! :)
Posted
I've never quite understood why not installing the GUI reduces the surface of attack? How many GUI (Desktop Experience) flaws have there been in recent times?

 

I'd always recommend installing the Desktop Experience as well as RSAT, then focus on using RSAT as much as possible for day to day tasks.

 

Well, the first things that come to mind are all the security patches we get for Internet Explorer etc and how much quicker Core seems to reboot than GUI.

 

Overall, I'll be sticking to Core where we can to make the most of our virtual environment's resources.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...