twin--turbo

Xda II The successor to the Xda, the Xda II, was released in November 2003. Intel XScale PXA263 (400 MHz) 128 MB SDRAM, 64 MB ROM 3.5" Transflective 65,536 colour LCD (240×320 pixels) I/O: cable (USB, RS-232), IrDA, Bluetooth, SD flash card & SDIO flash card Integral VGA camera (640×480 pixels) HTC codename: HTC Andes, but variants were known as HTC Himalaya

The XDA was the one I was thinking of.. Was definitely 2003/4 one of our colleauges had one. Rob

02 did somethign in the early 2k's... can't remember what it was but it was a phone with extra functionality. Rob

Excellent Rob

So you can get into SDM? but it crashes? There is an option to preview the commands so you could just cut and past from the preview. Or try using sdm-light by just going to teh IP of the router in your browser. Rob

And the solution? Rob

The routing between the Internal networks is not right yet so that needs resolved first. If the smoothwall is doing Proxy then NAT may not be needed. Rob

change the route on the smothwall as I have sugested and it should in theory start to work. the smoothwall needs to have the gateway for the new network pointing to the cisco's interface that is on the main network not the new wifi one. Rob

BTW, have you have changed your networks since your first posting? as they differ to your later posts. Rob

That's going to fail then. change it to 10.1.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.1.1.2 metric 0 enabled. Rob

have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan.

have you got the route set up on the smoothwall back to the other lan. have you done this command on the cisco ip routing what is the output of show ip route Rob

get 2 4506 cores in your server room with hrsp. diverse link them on 10Gb to distro rooms. with twin 3560v2 on 10gb then link the 3560's to 2960 edge switches... ps... judgement clouded by cisco-wsx-vino-red-btl-vsn2.2 rob

p.s. Cisco is generaly very very very reliable. .. if i was running the FT stock exchange , then having dual psu on the edge would be paramount. in a school, if computer services go down ofsted expect this, they expect an alternate lesson plan. you will not fail an ofstead on a computer systems failure. you will fail ofstead if a teacher has not got a backup lesson, rob

don#t waste too much on 45xx or 65xx overkill, or even edge overkill...... There has got to be better ways to spend the money.. over killing switching is a massive waste which I guarantee you will regret as you cant make it benefit you. 6hr near line backup has saved staff from disaster( 4 staff ) 3 times in the last 8 working days. Rob We are looking at 3570's for edge so we have have dual PSU and stack 9 of them.

also.... cable density ,,, You could look at RJ21 connected modules but spanning 240 RJ45's out of the standard modules gets very untidy or difficult to work with. Rob

spend it on storage, near line backup and blade servers. one 4507 with 2 sups, 2 psu's and then just fixed config 2960's and 3560's for distro and edge would be gr8, 2 4506's with one supervisor and HSRP would be better. 3 Cores doing edge work is massive overkill... Rob

LOL... bot our sites have twin 4507's but with just one sup6 in each, long story that includes rather a lot of waste! I counted 13 2960 switches with 3 or less connections to them recently!! the 4507's are redundant to each other with HSRP so only having one supervisor is not a massive issue except for devices that are single homed on one core ( wan link, meru ) Not many clients are on the cores at all. If your not using POE then you can opt for lower power output PSU's, On the 4500, don't drop below a SUP6 as the lower model supervisors don't support 10Gb line cards. ( oh yeah our sister site invested in the wrong kit.. More money! Rob

On 4507RE A SUP-6E will cost near £6K so if you want them redundant across 3 chassis that's 6x3x2 £36,000 for the supervisors. PSU's were 1K a pice for the 2800VA ones , so that's 2x3x1 £6K Full Compliment of 5 WS-X4548 line cards ( non poe ) 2K a pop so £30K Chassis £3k each so £9K So the basic build is going to be just over £80K........ for 720 Data Outlets. This excludes any CX4 10GB Links, Fibers, Etc... Rob

Get SDM onto the router and do it through the GUI. Rob

A Router is Layer 3 The smothwall has to know how to get to route to 10.1.1.x So in smoothwall routing you would have 10.1.1.0/255.255.255.0 via 10.1.2.1 Rob

am selling my cisco 877w to buy a 2830N Draytec.

6500 serise has greater throughput, it can also do more than just L2/3 switching and routing. it can have other cards for media content etc... Do you realy want to run everything of a core switch? We have 2x 4507RE but with 10GB or 1GB links to Distro switches. Rob

Draytek

My old V40 1.8 cost the same to insure as My current 3.0 V6 Jaguar s-type, and had very similar MPG Rob