AIT

Debug Ip Policy (route map name) is not an option. Only has an option to debug ACL list. (and not extended ones)

Hi All, ODD one. We use a 'route-map' to determine what to forward to our smooth wall cluster for filtering (or really the loadblancer). and this route-map refers to an ACL which defines if its a network we want to forward on or circumvent the smoothwalls. Up to date this has worked perfectly. However: as of a few days ago. Our ACL which contains an object-group (with a load of Microsoft Ip's in). Seems to only process down to the object group part of the ACL. Everything after that seems to be ignored. (or thats what the hit counters when viewing the ACL would appear to indicate along with Ip ranges suddenly not receiving transparent filtering) My question anyone has seen this before/know a fix? Thanks

Not sure where you are based, but this is right up our street. We started our business 10+ years ago as an in school IT team and now offer cloud services to schools joining together as a trust, to "act as one" if that makes sense. Possibly drop me a dm.

Hi All, Ok so we have resolved it. IT was GPO. We have dropped exchange into its own GPO and blocked inheritance. (so no policies apply) - GP Update and within 3 mins emails start flowing again. We don;t hold complete management of the site so have asked the local IT Team to let us know what they were playing with so we can highlight the specific GPO that caused it to stop. Very interesting error and never heard of GPO stopping email!!

C has 50GB Free Datastore drives (3 datastores on 3 drives) equally have plenty of space, one of our first test was to add around 20GB per drive. As above really. Must be something outside of the exchange box, to have a working exchange restored and not work.

Just to throw a little bit more out there. I have restored Exchange from 4 days before (when it was functioning properly) however powering this up has exactly the same fault. So does anyone know of anything else that can effect exchange in this manor? And I think the above answers the send receive connector question. I have re done all send receive connectors. So no, i dont think its even exchange now.

Hi All, Firstly we have seen this issue in the past but this one is currently defeating us. were 24hours in looking at this and nothing seems to get it to work. (not even for a short period of time) Local school has a single Exchange 2016 server. was on Update 8 and we have updated to 13 and now 14. Makes no difference. I'm aware a lot of these issues are caused by DNS being incorrect or set with multiple or external. We have ensured that its set to a local AD server and this server can resolve any MX record and added its name and FQN to the hosts file record. Error received: External servers are reporting the exchange server is issuing: Deferred: 451 4.7.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later. PRX4 Internal Email gets a similar log in transport logs: SmtpResponse:451 4.4.395 Target host responded with error. -> 235 Our Diagnostic: Transport services are all started and Active on exchange / certificates are valid Google reports this could be a DNS issue, and we have done every check. DNS is functioning properly and tried to put the local entry within the hosts file. Id be massively grateful if anyone has any ideas.

We look after large proportion of schools, and all Openhive users can send email outbound however any recipient replying or sending an email to Openhive fails with: Could not be delivered because of Mail loops back to me. 172.20.4.72. First encountered the problem around 12Noon yesterday and still issues this morning.

Right.. this has got me stumped. We have a telephone system that uses an external sip trunk 83.166.160.240. From my workstation can ping and tracert it fine, (to node4). From the server at the customers location pinging 83.166.160.240 gets a reply from 10.0.0.74 (the SIP Server...), Hence the ping coming back as a proper reply from a different ip. from the sip server itself you cannot pint 83.166.160.240. Has anyone got any thoughts. I have tried the obvious of clearing arp. (but there were no arp entries for 83.166.160.240.) help would greatly be appreciated. Thanks

As this quite clearly is a matter to both new and old customers of WebAnywere I feel its more than appropriate to ask if there will be any further updates / bug fixes and if the working relationship is still there for continued support. I have had a few conversations today both with WebAnywere and Overnet, both say they are "doing the support" Perhaps we could have clarity on who supports what?

Hi, Thank you, Firstly a far more professional response.. Could you clarify your current dealings/state with OverNetData and also if any further updates/bug fixes will be released. Also could you state the road map for the future. Thanks

yes its absolutely fine to do this during the day.

Apologies - read down the list too quickly.. So who's in the wrong? For us we host our own moodle and webanywere have provided a box specifically for the sims integration. who owns this? who owns the software on it?

Just wondering if anyone has spoken to WebAnywhere or even Overnet?

yup can get to/trace to mail.orcon.net.nz or mx1.iconz.co.nz a phone call to alter.net?

talk talk!? network.virginmedia.net

i should expand: see my traceroute Tracing route to mx.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.212] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 2 ms 1 ms 10.10.1.3 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 46.18.52.2 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms nott-lam-3-tenge74-2945.network.virginmedia.net [62.255.228.30] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms nott-core-1a-ge-500-0.network.virginmedia.net [80.1.79.125] 5 4 ms 4 ms 5 ms leed-bb-1a-as0-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.105.174.169] 6 10 ms 25 ms 9 ms 213.152.245.53 7 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms ge-4-2-0.mpr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.27.157] 8 83 ms 134 ms 82 ms xe-4-3-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.24.41] 9 83 ms 83 ms 83 ms xe-0-1-0.er2.iad10.us.above.net [64.125.31.210] 10 83 ms 86 ms 83 ms above-uu.iad10.us.above.net [64.125.13.174] 11 83 ms 193 ms 83 ms 0.ae1.XL3.IAD8.ALTER.NET [152.63.33.118] 12 154 ms 163 ms 195 ms 0.ge-3-0-4.IL3.LAX9.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.125] 13 154 ms 154 ms 154 ms 0.ge-7-0-0.IL1.LAX12.ALTER.NET [152.63.114.10] 14 312 ms 315 ms 314 ms 0.ge-6-0-0.XT3.AKL1.ALTER.NET [210.80.35.1] 15 298 ms 298 ms 280 ms 0.gigabitethernet-2-0-0.GW6.AKL1.ALTER.NET [210.80.35.10] 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 but then the hard part is we have some original ips from virgin media themselves 81.109.165.33 and if i do a traceroute from one of those ips (going through the same routers!!) it works fine.. and see below: Tracing route to mx.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.212] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 46.18.52.2 2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms nott-lam-3-tenge74-2945.network.virginmedia.net [62.255.228.30] 3 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms nott-core-1b-ge-500-0.network.virginmedia.net [80.1.79.241] 4 2 ms 42 ms 2 ms nrth-bb-1b-as1-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.105.174.173] 5 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms ae0.lon11.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.65.157] 6 75 ms 108 ms 75 ms xe-0-0-0.nyc32.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.184.182] 7 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms TenGigE0-0-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.179.72.121] 8 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms 0.xe-1-1-3.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.134] 9 151 ms 142 ms 142 ms 0.xe-3-2-0.IL4.LAX9.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.102] 10 142 ms 142 ms 142 ms 0.ge-7-0-0.IL2.LAX12.ALTER.NET [152.63.114.18] 11 275 ms 287 ms 275 ms 0.so-3-1-0.XT4.AKL1.Alter.Net [210.80.50.90] 12 286 ms 268 ms 268 ms 0.gigabitethernet-3-0-0.GW6.AKL1.ALTER.NET [210.80.35.18] 13 289 ms 271 ms 290 ms 210.80.27.6 14 275 ms 312 ms 272 ms ie1-g-0-0-0.telstraclear.net [203.98.50.1] 15 293 ms 275 ms 275 ms front2-clix.clear.net.nz [203.167.243.213] 16 274 ms 279 ms 292 ms mx.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.212] Trace complete.

Thanks Rob. Yes it does in both case each router has a route to the other /22 e.g. ip route 46.18.48.0 255.255.248.0 FastEthernet0/1 and that's what i expected you to only see the /21 route. This is the strange thing its working as i expected except for half way to newzeland. we are trying to get to mx.clear.net.nz (203.97.33.212) Doing a traceroute i stop at: 0.gigabitethernet-2-0-0.GW6.akl1.alter.net (210.80.35.10)

Hi, We have a slight issue at the moment routing traffic to Newzealand. We have 2 routers set up with HSRP (for redundancy) both going to the virgin media network. Both routers are configured in an active active state with traffic for 46.18.48.0/22 coming in on one and 46.18.52.0/22 coming in on the other. my only conclusion is the route must not be publishing correctly through bgp. just wondering if anyone could have a look at this and see what they think: BGP for 1st router: router bgp 23456 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 46.18.48.0 mask 255.255.248.0 network 46.18.48.0 mask 255.255.252.0 neighbor 82.0.246.10 remote-as 5089 neighbor 82.0.246.10 soft-reconfiguration inbound no auto-summary BGP for 2nd router: router bgp 23456 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 46.18.48.0 mask 255.255.248.0 network 46.18.52.0 mask 255.255.252.0 neighbor 62.255.228.30 remote-as 5089 neighbor 62.255.228.30 soft-reconfiguration inbound no auto-summary my question is really should i have the network 46.18.48.0 mask 255.255.252.0 statement and the network 46.18.52.0 mask 255.255.252.0 Thanks Phil

Not yet. Its been like that for a few years now... must admit looking at it now doesnt look too safe.. thanks for making me scared to sit at my own desk!!!

First question would be what is it? ADSL SDSL MIA? and what speed then you can judge on price?

os version 5.2.21869 manila version 2.5.19211619 rom version 1.66.405.2 radio version 2.06.51.07

I noticed my HD2 having very poor signal after the latest rom update? what rom version do you have.

Hi, I am planning to host this event at our school in Nottingham, I have support from the head and going to offer free food as well!!!! So please pass on the nudge to any schools in the East Midlands. Appreciate the offer to join Leicester's however firstly I would like to see if we gain enough interest to warrant our own. Again as Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire operate differently to Leicestershire.

Hi, A while back network managers in the East Midlands area were invited to join and go to a network manager's meeting. I was fully behind this move and nothing seemed to progress. So... Depending on the interest generated, I would be looking to start termly or bi-annual Network Manager’s Meetings for all schools in East Midlands. The meetings would involve discussing the current and future LA systems, with the hope to have at least one representative from the LA there (or having some communication link to the LA before and after the meeting). This would allow us to, (to borrow some words from a colleague) as one voice, pass on our collated opinions on current and future provision from the LA. I would also envision it being an opportunity to share information/resources, and possibly form collaborations and working groups for projects (as we are all understaffed, underfunded or both). As I see it, between us we should have a vast technical knowledge, so why not share it instead of paying through the nose for someone to come in with the same or lesser knowledge? Anyway… If you’re interested, let me know, either via pm or email. If you have any partner primaries who would be interested, please feel free to pass this onto them as well. I’ll be looking to arrange the first meeting asap. Thanks Phil