JohnJee Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Hi All, I've been asked to rewrite my job description. I basically run the network/telephone system/provide all the IT support. I have a boss who is "Head of ICT" and a teacher. I have put "Network Manager" as job title, but there seems to be an issue with this as I do not manage people. Do you have to manage people to be a network manager? I do manage the consultants/any IT companies who come in to do stuff etc. The day to day running of the whole school network is down to me basically. Just wonder what folk think. Sorry if posted to wrong area - this is my first post. Cheers JJ
Edu-IT Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Hi All, I've been asked to rewrite my job description. I basically run the network/telephone system/provide all the IT support. I have a boss who is "Head of ICT" and a teacher. I have put "Network Manager" as job title, but there seems to be an issue with this as I do not manage people. Do you have to manage people to be a network manager? I do manage the consultants/any IT companies who come in to do stuff etc. The day to day running of the whole school network is down to me basically. Just wonder what folk think. Sorry if posted to wrong area - this is my first post. Cheers JJ You manage the network. The job descriptions I've been reading lately don't mention anything about managing people under the title of 'network manager'.
Gatt Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I would stick with "Network Manager"as you "manage" the network dont you?
somabc Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I think all of these would be valid - Network Manager, IT Manager, Systems Administrator etc.
Edu-IT Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I think all of these would be valid - Network Manager, IT Manager, Systems Administrator etc. 'Anything with a plug on manager' would also be extremely valid. 1
glennda Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Director of Network Support, just to get the word director in there?
Gatt Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 'Anything with a plug on manager' would also be extremely valid. And the rest!!
somabc Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Director in Chief of Systems Administration and Learning Technologist Project Officer is my personal favourite
Guest theeldergeek Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Director in Chief of Systems Administration and Learning Technologist Project Officer is my personal favourite I'm not going to mention what my boss's title is, but it's a good 'un and not far off the above! It is just a title after all, but I don't think it describes what he does very well at all. What's wrong with Director of ICT, or ICT Manager or something similar? To me however, he doesn't need a title and he is one of the nicest blokes you could a) meet, or b) have as a boss. Please note : the above comment in no way is connected with the fact it is my Annual Performance Review tomorrow!
Dos_Box Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I have to admit I get peeved when I see people whoes job title is 'Systems Manager'. I was always told a systems manager managed several seperate and distinct networks and, well, systems. Not a single school LAN.
dwhyte85 Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Some schools think SIMS.NET qualifies as a single system alone, VLE another & then the network - not sure what definition of system they use, it seems interchangable - sounds good though. CTO or Director of ICT are great vanity titles for the CV...
elsiegee40 Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I think on my job description it says something like "Technical ICT Support" ... but there's only me. TBH I refer to myself as the IT Technician most of the time as it doesn't sound too important and helps sales weasels to lose interest in me. However when dealing with a stroppy parent recently, who was definitely in the wrong, I promoted myself to Network Manager. My HT thinks it's funny that I vary my job title to suit the audience and the occasion!
featured_spectre Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Systems infrastructure director... Sounds so nice I might give that one to myself when it cones to rewriting my job spec!
GrumbleDook Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Director? Who do you give direction to? Do you write strategies, manage their implementation and so on? Then you are not a director. CTO? Are you really the chief? You are managed by the Head of ICT but you don't say at what level you make decisions? Unless you are *the* person who decides the technology and how it fits in with the needs of the institute? If not then perhaps the title is a tad too lofty. Ok, I know some of the above stuff was tongue in cheek by those posters, as is my reply. If you manager the IT then you an IT Manager, including design and deployment, being *part* of the group working on what the school needs, etc ... If you do not manage then you are a technician. There is nothing wrong with either title ... both are highly respectable and I know some schools do not use them properly, might use one to forceably keep your salary low, or use the other to artificially inflate it (in comparison to similarly employed technicians) as they want to pay you a decent wage. But I honestly don't see the need to com up with fancy titles. Network Manager and IT Manager are fairly interchangeable in our eyes but we know that some people don't fully understand that the 'network' could mean the infrastructure and switches ... it could mean the systems sat on that infrastructure ... it might or might not include the telephones, cctv, VLE, etc ... but by calling it 'IT' or even 'IS' then it can help. I think my favourite so far is Information & Technology Services ... and the team there (3 of them) could clearly show what it meant (an ITS Manager, a data manager and technician / developer), and the whole school new. Just my thoughts ...
t4ll1f3r Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 Systems Manager as I manage systems. However if you don't manage people itcan inhibit your rise up the pay scale.
SYNACK Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I would be looking at "ICT Systems Administrator" as a good term that encompases all of your tasks without tripping over their contention. As it is a job description then you probably want a nice official term to help give the position weight in managment and accountant type areas. Personally I use all sorts of titles depending on what I want to achive and who I am talking to. A stroppy supplier education (teacher) focused may get ICT Facilitator to prevent their usual malace towards IT pros and an internal email may be signed ICT Administrator. For a job title though it is best to stick to a good solid and wide ranging title that properly encompases and represents your role.
maniac Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 I was 'ICT Development Engineer' at my previous school, which was basically deputy to the Network Manager, who had the Job Title 'ICT Co-Ordinator' but essentially did the same job as a network manager. They did like their fancy job titles at that school. Mike.
Guest theeldergeek Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 For a job title though it is best to stick to a good solid and wide ranging title that properly encompases and represents your role. Technical Dogsbody it is then...
witch Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 ITBH I refer to myself as the IT Technician most of the time as it doesn't sound too important and helps sales weasels to lose interest in me. However when dealing with a stroppy parent recently, who was definitely in the wrong, I promoted myself to Network Manager. My HT thinks it's funny that I vary my job title to suit the audience and the occasion! Snap! Except I usually use 'Network Manager' to sales people because it makes it clear to them who makes the decisions and how important I *really* am!! After all, I manage the entire network on my own in both schools - I know they are only small, and I wouldn't put myself up there with the NMs in big senior schools, but IMHO there should be quite a big scale for NM to encompass those of us at the bottom, who, whilst not having a large network physically, still have all and complete responsibility for specifying equipment, software, day to day operations, updates, future plans and everything else. An IT technician, AFAIC, doesn't carry that sort of responsiblity So generally, I am a small system Network Manager!!
sippo Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 Officially I'm Network manager, but I prefer network administrator. Manager seems to formal for me.
sidewinder Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 My boss is the network manager, my job title is network administrator. Work that one out
Hightower Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 My job title could be 'General Dogs Body' - I couldn't care less as long as the pay is right each month. What is a title? Network Manager means nothing if you are still paid the lowly wage of a junior tech.
CAM Posted February 9, 2010 Posted February 9, 2010 I have to admit I get peeved when I see people whoes job title is 'Systems Manager'. I was always told a systems manager managed several seperate and distinct networks and, well, systems. Not a single school LAN. What if you have an admin network and a curriculum network?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now