Discussion on St Margarets Job Ad.

[redsnappa]

http://www.edugeek.net/forums/educational-jobs/24096-ict-technician-st-margaret-ward-catholic-school-arts-college.html

 

This advert is illegal as it breaks the anti age discrimination laws by asking for 21-25.

 

The school could and should face prosecution for allowing this to be published

Edited November 12, 2008 by MkII
Split thread

[pavlovs_dog]

That is point 21 - 25 on the payscale.

[AngryTechnician]

Actually it looks to me like the 21-25 is part of the pay range description, e.g. pay range 6, spine point 21-25.

 

Edit: What he said

Edited November 11, 2008 by AngryTechnician
I is teh slow

[jamin100]

This advert is illegal as it breaks the anti age discrimination laws by asking for 21-25.

 

The school could and should face prosecution for allowing this to be published

 

lmao

[jamin100]

This advert is illegal as it breaks the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 whichcame into force on 1st October 2006 by asking for candidates aged 21-25.

 

The school could and should face prosecution for allowing this to be published

 

21-25 IS THE PAYSCALE!

NOT THE AGE RANGE!

[sparkeh]

21-25 IS THE PAYSCALE!

NOT THE AGE RANGE!

 

I was having a bad day till I read this thread

[krisd32]

This advert is illegal as it breaks the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 whichcame into force on 1st October 2006 by asking for candidates aged 21-25.

 

The school could and should face prosecution for allowing this to be published

 

LOL, Can't take a point obviously!

[pinemarten]

could be waist measurement - (only those with hourglass figure need apply!)

[maz8462]

I think you will find that's the point on scale 6 that you are looking at not the age

ie point 21-25 on scale 6

A very easy mistake to make

[powdarrmonkey]

In defence, it's not really very clear. But that doesn't make up for posting the same point twice.

[dezt]

that's just brightened up my day..... he he