Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know it's a needed to strengthen our safeguarding policy.

But getting it across to SLT is a different matter.

 

Any offers ?

Cheers in advance

Posted (edited)

I'd like to know why you're after Smoothwall too?

 

Out of all the testing I did for on-site filtering Sophos (UTM not XG) came out as suiting our environment the best, it came out cheaper, had more features, and was compliant with prevent.

Edited by Blue_Cookeh
Posted
I'd like to know why you're after Smoothwall too?

Out of all the testing I did for on-site filtering Sophos (UTM not XG) came out as suiting our environment the best, it came out cheaper, had more features, and was compliant with prevent.

Indeed. That's the same for us also. We bought 5 Sophos UTM boxes for our trust.

Posted

I found Sophos UTM absolutely terrible. Box had to keep being restarted until it was finally resolved by a firmware update.

 

Smoothwall just works, and the user interface is far better than Sophos in my opinion.

Posted

I went from smoothwall to sophos. Smoothwalls support was poor and the product felt buggy with a counterintuitive user interface.

 

I was very happy with the sophos solution. Felt a more polished product with better support.

Posted

Realistically if you're going from [Nothing] to [something] I'd advise you go down the UTM Firewall route rather than the Proxy route, finances permitting.

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm a happy Smoothwall customer, and I would recommend them, but the UTM route just seems the better option if you're not bolting things onto already-existing infrastructure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...