Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We currently have some Macs in the media studies department, the media department say that this years media curriculum specifies that the students 'have ' to use Macs so they need more. Has anyone else heard this?

 

This year we have a 'very' tight budget we aren't planning on replacing anything other than failed hardware so there certainly isn't any money to buy some new Macs, especially as they are only for use by the media department.

 

I find it most unusual that a curriculum authority would specify a particular company’s product i was under the impression that you could use anything that you can produce your media on including Linux desktops.

 

Thanks for any input.

Posted

No curriculum specifies brands. They may specify functions which end up with their only being a single brand which can do the job, but the brand won't be mentioned.

 

Ask for a copy of the curriculum to look at.

Posted
We currently have some Macs in the media studies department, the media department say that this years media curriculum specifies that the students 'have ' to use Macs so they need more. Has anyone else heard this?

 

This year we have a 'very' tight budget we aren't planning on replacing anything other than failed hardware so there certainly isn't any money to buy some new Macs, especially as they are only for use by the media department.

 

I find it most unusual that a curriculum authority would specify a particular company’s product i was under the impression that you could use anything that you can produce your media on including Linux desktops.

 

Thanks for any input.

 

I don't blame them specifying particular applications to use....but this is GCSE Media not A-Level or degree level, where you have to specify industry standards such as FCP, Avid or Pro Tools.

 

GCSE Media in schools appears to consist of basically a little bit of exposure to Movie Maker and iMovie or a third-party cheap and cheerful 'video editor'....so dictating software and platforms does seem a little bit odd.

 

However i do think they should be moving towards using industry standard software for year 11's in Media studies, whether that be on PC or Mac should be down to the school and what decisions they can make based on budget and in-house skillset. FCP and FCP express are exclusive to the Mac...yes Avid Express and to a lesser extent, Premiere, are equivalent. But all three are pretty advanced for all but the most able Year 11's.....plus the fact the examining bodies are still demanding coursework to be handed on VHS ffs indicites they don't know they're mojo from their kona.

Posted

I know of one local college that has Mac's in their Media department, but insists on having them dual boot Windows/Mac OS (not exactly politically correct for the Mac purists).

 

Personal opinion is that Macs are OK for Media/Art, but when its down to delivering a wide range of applications and networking, it has to be PC's.

 

P.S. we don't have Mac's at the moment, but I know a Deputy Head has had a demo recently, and is interested. My argument is that the IT Support in house is PC based, and none of my technicians are keen on learning about supporting Mac's because of the limited field.

Posted
I don't think they will be getting 30 so we can't replace a whole room and our prefered option is to replace a room of dead P2's.

 

Well explain that to SMT. Media studies can have 30 Macs all to themselves, or you can buy 100 PCs to be used around the school. Let them make the desision and then pass people onto them when they complian they havent got a pc

Posted

I hope its not true about requiring macs for media studies, 2 years ago our media studies dept insisted that they required macs for their course. So we bought a load in, and they just never got used (teachers said they didnt know how to use them or the media based software on them (we had premiere/ulead). They pretty much sat gathering dust til they were reallocated to the ICT dept.

 

Hoping we arent going to have to buy another wodge load in to give to the media dept to not be used

Posted
I don't think they will be getting 30 so we can't replace a whole room and our prefered option is to replace a room of dead P2's.

 

They don't really need 30 macs. One mac per group of 2 for doing video projects would suffice. You could have a combination of Mac and PC in the room to have a full suite of 30 odd computers...it would ease the budget slightly while still making good use of the media dept. And allow them to do video and graphic design work on the mac.

 

I understand the technical staffs reluctance to learn the mac environment......but if the money is there for any kind of technical training, i can guarantee they'll get a lot of enjoyment and job satisfaction in administering an OSX environment. And it's not a limited field in education, a lot of schools now have a signifacnt mac presence in their IT environments....corporate IT is a different kettle of fish. But then we all know how hard it is to break out of the education bubble for school technicians.

 

. Plus once you get going with os x server it's a really cool way to learn most of the unix command line and you can even setup unix services such as apache and samba....Mac's aren't all bells and whistles, the core is built on a powerful and flexible unix underpinning.

Posted
We currently have some Macs in the media studies department, the media department say that this years media curriculum specifies that the students 'have ' to use Macs so they need more. Has anyone else heard this?

 

Our art / media department is getting itself a whole new building built at the moment (I can see a half-dozen Polish tiling chaps scrambling around on the roof at the moment), and wants Macs in their new ICT suite. For its size and quietness, I still haven't found anything cheaper than the Mac Mini - £400 for the basic device, add your own screen, keyboard and mouse. We've got a quote off of some company for around £550 each all-in, and of course that includes the wodge of decent software that comes included with Mac OS X. We should have us a suite full of completely silent computers, with some decent elbow room between workstations.

 

--

David Hicks

Posted (edited)

"I understand the technical staffs reluctance to learn the mac environment......"

 

I know how to use Macs and as i say we already have some so that's not the issue.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I haven't used a Mac Mini but aren't they a bit underpowered for video editing?

Edited by cookie_monster
Posted
"I understand the technical staffs reluctance to learn the mac environment......"

 

I know how to use Macs and as i say we already have some so that's not the issue.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I haven't used a Mac Mini but aren't they a bit underpowered for video editing?

 

 

sorry, it was nexus-6 who said something about learning the mac skillset.

thought it was:o you

Posted
I haven't used a Mac Mini but aren't they a bit underpowered for video editing?

 

They come with a 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo and 1GB of ram as standard. The only place where they could really be considered underpowered would be the hard drive which is a standard 5400rpm laptop jobby. And that could be worked around using an external firewire unit. Admittedly they wouldn't be my first choice for video editing but I don't think they'd do a bad job by any stretch of the imagination.

Posted
They come with a 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo and 1GB of ram as standard. The only place where they could really be considered underpowered would be the hard drive which is a standard 5400rpm laptop jobby. And that could be worked around using an external firewire unit. Admittedly they wouldn't be my first choice for video editing but I don't think they'd do a bad job by any stretch of the imagination.

 

I recently bought a 1Ghz VIA fanless embedded motherboard/CPU, and even that came with separate on-board support for 2D video. We used to do video editing of Mini DV footage (so 12GB per hour of footage) half a decade ago on machines that I'm sure must have been less than 1Ghz, so pretty much anything around these days should be able to cope just fine. Okay, we had to leave those machines overnight to render snazzy effects in Premier, but basic chops and fades should be near instantaneous on any machine these days.

 

--

David Hicks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...