Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Upgrades are only free before 29 July 2016.

 

So they should get going then, if they haven't done it by then, again, that's on them... And after July any new computer will come with it, so not a problem...

Posted

Why do we have to go through resellers?

 

Can't we/aren't we capable of buying the licences direct?

 

If schools need to make savings this would be a start!

Posted

not 100% but I believe you can think you have to go through a company called west coats, I believe who Microsoft sell the licences through these people then resellers go through them

I might be wrong but when I look at my account through the portal its always westcoast that place the order

Welcome to Westcoast

Posted
Windows 10 - Corporate

 

That's the MS link (Yep MS link :D )

 

 

 

The bit I don't get is I assumed that meant only within the school not at home :s Or does that mean staff can have it free at home too?

 

Steve

 

hi Steve,

 

The page mentions personal computers:

 

"Windows 10 Education, offered as an upgrade license, is permitted for use during school and beyond graduation on personal computers. If required, schools can also manage certain attributes of the student’s device on the school’s domain."

Posted (edited)

@Dos_Box:

 

Again, many thanks for organising this. Currently, I am still hearing two very different stories from resellers:

 

The first, is that price increases of between 14-19% are being applied in July 2016, July 2017 and again in July 2018, the implication being that the base price may be around 60% more expensive at its high end.

 

The second, is that those price increases will be applied, but will only affect those taking out new agreements during that same period, and that costs for those renewing an agreement from July 2018 will be only 14-19% higher than they are now.

 

Is there any chance this could be run by your MS contact in order to provide some clarity - if not precise figures, which I don't expect?

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Edited by elsiegee40
Posted

 

"Windows 10 Education, offered as an upgrade license, is permitted for use during school and beyond graduation on personal computers. If required, schools can also manage certain attributes of the student’s device on the school’s domain."

 

I took that as BYOD though, as the next bit is about managing student device's on a domain. As in being able to restrict things while at school? Maybe I'm misreading that part though

 

Thanks,

Steve

Posted
Windows 10 Education, offered as an upgrade license, is permitted for use during school and beyond graduation on personal computers.

 

@garethedmondson, this part is surely relevant... they would need to have an earlier version of Windows already, if it works the same way as standard Volume Licensing arrangements at least?

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
@Dos_Box:

 

Again, many thanks for organising this. Currently, I am still hearing two very different stories from resellers:

 

The first, is that price increases of between 14-19% are being applied in July 2016, July 2017 and again in July 2018, the implication being that the base price may be around 60% more expensive at its high end.

 

The second, is that those price increases will be applied, but will only affect those taking out new agreements during that same period, and that costs for those renewing an agreement from July 2018 will be only 14-19% higher than they are now.

 

Is there any chance this could be run by your MS contact in order to provide some clarity - if not precise figures, which I don't expect?

 

Thanks in anticipation.

 

Yes, it would be very interesting to clarify that. We are starting plans to move to Google Apps and the potential future MS licencing costs are a significant driver behind this. The future licensing costs will be influencing how much of our IT we move to other alternatives. Windows itself is next on my radar.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Hi all, I know that we will be renewing for 2016-2017 on the same fixed price (we are in our 3rd year of a 3 year fixed deal)

2017-2018 will be another 1 year deal at 'price not known'

2018-2021 will again be another price increase but fixed for those 3 years - so in effect for 2019-2021 there would be a saving as in that period the discount is fully removed.

 

Not an option for us to move everything to the cloud as our MIS server would not allow for this to happen.

 

Hmmmm... Capita and SIMS in the cloud eh ? :laugh:

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just been plodding through all this, so its all in the cloud or pay more. Pretty much sums up what MS are saying.

 

Not too worry, apparently the future of IT in education is all ipads anyway :p

Posted
Hmmmm... Capita and SIMS in the cloud eh ? :laugh:

 

You'll be amazed how these vendors' products will suddenly become "cloud" if the frameworks require it.

 

Of course being properly engineered for massively scalable SaaS is very different to the supplier slapping a hosted VM in Azure but I'm sure sales & marketing will get around it...

  • 8 months later...
Posted
Just coming up to renewing our MS OVS-ES licencing. Still within a 3yr term. Reseller is saying I have to licence based on core count (eg as I would server 2016, because, "that's just how MS do it now"). Is this correct, do I have to move over to 2016 licencing even though I'm still running 2012 (2008 in some cases)...?
Posted
Just coming up to renewing our MS OVS-ES licencing. Still within a 3yr term. Reseller is saying I have to licence based on core count (eg as I would server 2016, because, "that's just how MS do it now"). Is this correct, do I have to move over to 2016 licencing even though I'm still running 2012 (2008 in some cases)...?

Yes. You always licence to the latest OS or software version with OVS-ES licencing and get "downgrade" rights.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
Just coming up to renewing our MS OVS-ES licencing. Still within a 3yr term. Reseller is saying I have to licence based on core count (eg as I would server 2016, because, "that's just how MS do it now"). Is this correct, do I have to move over to 2016 licencing even though I'm still running 2012 (2008 in some cases)...?

 

I'm sure I read somewhere that it wouldn't affect the pricing as long as you had 8 or fewer cores in each server - more than that would be more expensive. I'll see if I can find something to back that up later

Edited by Sagima
supermarket grammar error
Posted
I'm sure I read somewhere that it wouldn't affect the pricing as long as you had 8 or fewer cores in each server - more than that would be more expensive. I'll see if I can find something to back that up later

 

Yup from what I remember a dual quad-core CPU server would cost the same as what you pay for a dual CPU licence now.

 

It's those with the 12-16 core processors who need watch out!

Posted

This is why I'm going to standardise on octacore processors for the time being - just means I'll need more sockets to get the number of cores required. Problem with that, if you're using VMware, is that hosts can have up to two sockets each on Essentials Plus, so you could find yourself facing a hefty bill to upgrade to vSphere Standard.

 

That's why we went for Hyper-V in the end - they wanted about as much for the Standard licensing as I was about to spend on server hardware. Now, normally, as Network Manager 'n' shizzle, I clearly spend a great deal of time considering and weighing up different technical options. In this case, though, it was about ten seconds of staring at the VMware quote followed by, "That's it! We're moving to Hyper-V!" :p

 

Currently running two hosts (on-site), both with four Opteron hexacores each and 128GB RAM. Will shortly be upgrading to hosts with four Xeon octacores each and 256GB RAM. That should sort us out in private cloud terms for the next few years, while making sure our Windows Server licensing remains simplified... :)

Posted
Yup from what I remember a dual quad-core CPU server would cost the same as what you pay for a dual CPU licence now.

It's those with the 12-16 core processors who need watch out!

 

*Looks at his 28 core servers* Hmm... This may be expensive.

Posted
I'm sure I read somewhere that it wouldn't affect the pricing as long as you had 8 or fewer cores in each server - more than that would be more expensive. I'll see if I can find something to back that up later

 

It was here https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/ausoemteam/2016/07/26/windows-server-2016-licensing-model/

 

"The 2-core pack for each edition is one-eighth the price of a 2-processor license for corresponding Windows Server 2012 R2 editions"

 

I did misremember though it's 16 cores we have to licence over two processors minimum so, with the exception of my two virtual servers (which have dual 12 core processors), it doesn't affect me

Posted (edited)
We got prices for standard around £4 per 2 core licences, so the extras arnt that much unless you have data centre, that was around £28 per 2 core licences. Edited by smithson83
Posted
We got prices for standard around £4 per 2 core location, so the extras arnt that much unless you have data centre, that was around £28 oer 2 core licences.

Yeah, we run data-centre, as its on a Hyper-V cluster.

Posted (edited)

Yup Datacenter on our stuff as well to get the unlimited guest VM Windows licenses

@localzuk best get begging for some extra budget now as you have the mandatory 13% to deal with as well as these core changes

Edited by gshaw

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...