Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
ok so I'm slow but it thought there'd been a bloodbath at a gig when I read the title kicked the **ck off means something very different to me , I must be getting old...
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I read that this morning. The numbers are pretty clear - Spotify is paying quite a chunk of money to the record labels. The question is, after that stage, how much of that money ends up in the actual artist's pockets, and how much of it ends up being sucked up by the label?

 

I know that I used to pirate all my music. I only ever bought second hand albums if I bought anything. I think the most I ever spent was £2.50. None of that went to the artist, that's for sure.

 

Now? I've been a subscriber to Spotify for over 5 years now, paying £9.99 a month without issue. That's over £600 I've spent that I would never have spent in the past.

 

On top of that, I've discovered new artists via the software that I'd never have found before. I've even went and bought physical albums for those little unknown artists (I've just ordered "Maybe Trapped Mostly Troubled by Tessa Violet", for example) because I want to support them with extra. I'd never have thought of doing that before Spotify appeared.

Posted
Can't argue with that. She does seem a little foolish to be missing out on that piece of pie. I guess it isn't about the money for her though.

 

I read that this morning. The numbers are pretty clear - Spotify is paying quite a chunk of money to the record labels. The question is, after that stage, how much of that money ends up in the actual artist's pockets, and how much of it ends up being sucked up by the label?

 

Have to agree with you both, there. I assume (but do not know for certain) that an artist can find out how much their CD is retailing for (for example, just by checking prices in shops) and work out what cut they're getting. However, agreements with Napster/Pandora/Spotify/Etc are usually conducted behind NDA's AFAIK, so artists don't know if they're getting a decent cut or not.. Sounds more like Ms. Swift should be taking up her beef with her label rather than Spotify, though it's perfectly possible that this is her taking it up with her label. Angry fans + less royalties.. Hit 'em where it hurts - in the pocket!

Posted

Been on spotify unlimted for a couple of years now, becoming premium doesn't really appeal to me, i use my laptop /pc around the house, and mobile signal generally in my area isnt great, so using it while out and about is of no use (which you get with premium)

 

My general rule of thumb is i'll get a feel for an album/artist via spotify, and if i really like it, i'll go out and download it off iTunes. If i absolutely love it, i'll go and buy the physical CD for my collection.

Posted

I use it on my phone and play it in the car all the time. So for me, it's worth the £9.99 a month. I prefer it to last.fm.

 

Shamefully my favourite playlists are all the Now That's What I Call Music albums on there... all dem playlists!

Posted
Been on spotify unlimted for a couple of years now, becoming premium doesn't really appeal to me, i use my laptop /pc around the house, and mobile signal generally in my area isnt great, so using it while out and about is of no use (which you get with premium)

 

The value of premium is that with the mobile app, you can synchronise things to the phone so it'll work when out of signal range. I've got about 40 hours of music synchronised to my phone at the moment, which I use when travelling.

Posted
Ohh, my mistake, i always assumed it downloaded the song as you tried to play it (as per if you were on youtube with an aux cable etc)....
Posted
I've set mine to download on 'extreme' quality!! Don't think they've all sync'ed to that level yet, but can't wait to crank up Coldplay - Paradise (just for the intro) used to get a well good buzz off it when in my old car (pretty sure it had bose speakers) and my mp3 player.
Posted
Ohh, my mistake, i always assumed it downloaded the song as you tried to play it (as per if you were on youtube with an aux cable etc)....

 

It can do that too if you want to. Its your choice.

Posted
It can do that too if you want to. Its your choice.

 

So if I got Spotify I could download tracks and put them on my (100% offline) mp3 player? (I don't have unlimited data on my phone, plus I much prefer having individual gadgets)

Posted
So if I got Spotify I could download tracks and put them on my (100% offline) mp3 player? (I don't have unlimited data on my phone, plus I much prefer having individual gadgets)
If your MP3 runs Spotify, yes. You can download them for offline use.
  • Thanks 1
Posted
So if I got Spotify I could download tracks and put them on my (100% offline) mp3 player? (I don't have unlimited data on my phone, plus I much prefer having individual gadgets)

 

The device has to run the Spotify app - so basically it has to be an iPod Touch, android device or Windows Phone (I think?!).

Posted

Whilst I do agree (I'd love half a million...), it's nice to see the opinion from both sides and actual figures being mentioned. Normally I'd expect this to just go.

 

Spotify: "We gave T-Swifty a butt-tonne of money. She's being silly and she'll come crawling back."

T-Swift: "Lolno, you gave me bugger all."

Spotify: "No we didn't!"

T-Swift: "Yes you did!"

Repeat ad-infinatum.

Posted

BTW guys... if you still want your fix of Taylor Swift streaming you can still get it on Play Music All Access ;)

 

swift_on_play.PNG

 

Why you wouldn't be listening to Avril Lavign instead, I don't know though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...