tarquel Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 (edited) [Geoff inadvertantly gave me an idea by his post earlier - thanks lol] Here we go: -ATI- - Official ATI Catalyst [unified] drivers [currently 8.12 - as of Dec 08]: - XP: Desktop - Laptop - Vista 32bit: Add-in - Integrated - 3rd party mod tool - so you can update your laptop gfx card drivers (if they arent part of the approved list): Mobility Modder - DriverHeaven.net [havent tried this much newer version yet, though my laptop does require a clean XP install soon i think There are pretty detailed instruction on the above page, and is possible on both XP and Vista, and even on good ol' 98] - Omega Drivers for all ATI Radeon cards - both XP and Vista version available: OmegaDrivers.net - Home of the ATI & NVIDIA Omega Drivers. ATI -NVidia- - Main Nvidia drivers download selector page: Drivers - Download NVIDIA Drivers - Nvidia GeForce Release [XP @ 177.41 - June 08] download pages: GeForce Release 177 - Vista [32bit] GeForce Release 177 - 2k/XP Win 9x/ME - (81.98) - 9x/ME [why r u using this? ] - Omega Drivers for all Nvidia Geforce [and supported] cards: OmegaDrivers.net - Home of the ATI & NVIDIA Omega Drivers. NVIDIA Any more links - pm or post [the post will be deleted after i add the links just so ya know ] Regards Nath Edited January 1, 2009 by tarquel
ChrisH Posted September 29, 2005 Posted September 29, 2005 I have always had Nvidia cards since 3DFX took a nose dive just set in my ways I guess. I am currently using the 78.05 beta drivers with no issues at all as they have some specific fixes in them for the source engine. Seems they have fixed the performance issues as well now on DoD:S as im now running 1600 X 1200 and most options on full as well as full HDR
tarquel Posted September 30, 2005 Author Posted September 30, 2005 Nice one chris - what nvidia card you got out of interest? or you the git with SLI? [waste o' cash really tho isnt it? :P ] Regards N. PS you want me to add 3DFX to the list? lol
ChrisH Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 Ive got two 7800 GTs . I just discovered last night they were not running at their full potential either as you can set special SLI profiles for games so I will investigate further tonight. Not something they make immediately obvious! It is an expensive setup but it is worth it.
E1uSiV3 Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 ATI make some awesome cards, as do nVidia, but nVidia can write drivers that actually work properly, so my vote goes to nVidia.
Geoff Posted September 30, 2005 Posted September 30, 2005 ATI make some awesome cards, as do nVidia, but nVidia can write drivers that actually work properly, so my vote goes to nVidia. Lies! Have you seen the god awful state of their Linux drivers?
tarquel Posted September 30, 2005 Author Posted September 30, 2005 @Chris: Thought it was 7800 GT's - was even gonna put it in my prev post lol Cheers N.
E1uSiV3 Posted October 1, 2005 Posted October 1, 2005 ATI make some awesome cards, as do nVidia, but nVidia can write drivers that actually work properly, so my vote goes to nVidia. Lies! Have you seen the god awful state of their Linux drivers? OK ill rephrase: At least nVidia can write decent Windows drivers, i cant vouch for linux... From past experiences, ATI drivers have been a pain in the arse to install, configure and have been unstable alot of the time on various windows platforms (9x, ME, 2000 + XP) Ive faced drivers doing poor hardware detection and refusing to install on correct chipsets, stating they are incorect drivers, system hangs after installs and general in game crashes caused by the ATI cards or drivers involved. nVidia on the other hand ive had far less problems with in the past, their unified driver platform has never failed me yet, and i cannot recall a single in game crash caused by nVidia based hardware or drivers. ATIs saving grace: i own an ATI X300 in my laptop, and its worked fine with a variety of games ive thrown at it, only thing that annoys me is the half dozen flickers when it changes screen modes and when power saving modes kick in.
tarquel Posted October 2, 2005 Author Posted October 2, 2005 never had those problems with any ati card / system i've had/built/repaired. Minus-ME that is - but who uses ME anyhow? (some poor saps I know lol ) N.
Irazmus Posted February 27, 2007 Posted February 27, 2007 I've not had many problems with either ATI or NVidia cards or drivers, but I prefer NVidia as their drivers support more modes for dual screens. The only complaint I have with NVidia is the heat generated by the 8800. My record thus far, 75°C at full load, and from what I've read, thats normal 8O
Kitkatninja Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 Generally speaking I prefer Nvidia cards over ATi, however my current work laptop has the x1600 card from ATi and it runs various software titles smoothly. -Ken
Ryan Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 This needs updating - current Catalyst version is 8.3 as of this post date. linkypoo
mac_shinobi Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 I can't comment truely so don't go flaming me as this is only based on the fact that most of the graphics cards I have had were nvidia and I have only had a really old 8mb ati card and since that experience have always lent towards nvidia for graphics cards. So for that reason and the fact that nvidia cards have worked for me seamlesly so far I am going with nvidia
flyinghaggis Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 (edited) Nvidia FTW In fact I'm planning on NEVER buying an ATI/AMD card again in the near future at home or at work. This is because they left beta-testing code in the driver that broke all of the open-GL dependant apps (of which there were loads) at our school for users without admin rights, so everyone at work apart from IT!, and didn't fix the problem for at least 3-4 driver version updates nor did they ever admit to the error That's unbelievably sloppy for a company the size of AMD and show's just how little testing/design they put into coding their drivers. In fact we still get all kinds of weird graphical glitches on the ATI cards such as black bars on the windows shutdown screen that aren't a problem on Nvidia or even intel onboard PCs. That and we've had problems with a lot of the older ATI chipset based cards in our school dying whereas we've never had a single failure in any NVidia based model. To top it off they try and bundle crapware (earthsim!) with their driver releases and I've had numerous issues with driver updates. ATI/AMD Graphics cards (software drivers in particular) are complete and total rubbish IMO! NVidia/Intel cards on the other hand quite simply just seem to work Edited April 7, 2008 by flyinghaggis
tarquel Posted July 3, 2008 Author Posted July 3, 2008 Initial post updated [well... I thought it was about time ] P.S. I'm a ATI fan Nvidia has given me much weirdness, whereas ATI has been a rock to me [except on my overheating lappy ] Regards Nath.
ashgray2 Posted May 24, 2009 Posted May 24, 2009 I choose ATI video cards, since I used for 2 years in studying 3D and CAD. Also ATI GPU's is not for gaming only but also for designing such high quality of 3D rendered image.
llawwehttam Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 Lies! Have you seen the god awful state of their Linux drivers? To be honest I've had less problems with Nvidia's linux drivers than ati's linux drivers.
kmount Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 To be honest I've had less problems with Nvidia's linux drivers than ati's linux drivers. That quote was from over 4 years ago. Nvidia drivers have played better for me in that 4 years to now.
mac_shinobi Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 To be honest I've had less problems with Nvidia's linux drivers than ati's linux drivers. I don't use linux unless in a virtual machine so a moot point for me lol. So far I have been with nvidia but I think nvidia need to pull there socks up a bit as they are now falling behind as ATI have had the 5870 and also brought out the 5890 out and still no sign of the 300 series GTX cards. If they don't do something soon and ATI make a mac version of the 5870 I think I will be tempted to get one.
llawwehttam Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 (edited) Thats the funny thing with linux. Things can change very fast or not at all. My new laptop has a Nvidia Geforce GT130m and is running very smoothly with ubuntu 9.10. I have heard horror stories about the GT230M though. Edited December 24, 2009 by llawwehttam
ahuxham Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 I still play EVE online with my XFX HD4890 1GB, and have yet to have any problems with Linux drivers, added the fact ATI are really pushing Linux drivers which seems the best way forward. Newer releases of *BSD support the F790 chipset out of box and play very nice. ATI/AMD fan, always have been, always will be. Added lifetime support for over clocking, mine has been faultless.
LiamHaith Posted April 14, 2015 Posted April 14, 2015 I'd always been an AMD fan, until I saw the Titan X... now I've been converted and cannot wait until my final end goal rig is built. Hopefully it'll be somewhat future proof as far as GPUs go since I'm aiming to run 4 Titan X's in SLI for maximum 4k performance. I still love my little AMD cards for now though. They're the card that just keeps on giving, never had an issue with them and they perform well above their cost.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now