Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
What's more important, the smooth running of a school built upon a state of the art network that integrates many management tools within its ICT or the sacking of a few TA's (or other staff) when teachers should be able to teach anyway without the help of assistants, assistants were never included when they were at uni I can imagine!

 

The sacking of a few TAs!!! What on earth are you going on about!? Seriously, would you be thinking the same if it was 'sacking a few technicians/network managers'??

Posted

I'm trying to point out that there are probalby less important areas that can be cut back, intead of ICT. That is not to say that TA's aren't important as I know they are and they work very hard for very low pay!

 

D

Posted
I'm trying to point out that there are probalby less important areas that can be cut back, intead of ICT. That is not to say that TA's aren't important as I know they are and they work very hard!

 

Yes, and those areas HAVE been cut back. Department budgets have been slashed, library budget has been slashed to the extent that our PTA is being asked to buy books etc... What part of 'there is no money' is difficult to understand!?

Posted

1. Switch all machines in school to linux, except for a small citrix farm for running SIMS.net, and other software like that. We already have Citrix licenses.

2. Switch only classroom workstations to linux, leaving teacher laptops as Windows machines, and leaving our admin machines as citrix thin clients.

 

OK, if you're serious about this, I'd say 2 is a non-starter, you're going to have a nightmare with people using different kit to teach and to prepare with.

 

Linux clients can be persuaded to authenticate against AD, so if you're keeping some Windows infrastructure to handle the admin network it might be easier to keep your AD infrastructure for authentication, at least for now, otherwise you're looking at OpenLDAP.

Posted
Agreed, if there is no other option localz as you have pointed out and we have discussed then as Steve says maybe look at just replacing the client side? :-)
Posted
I'm trying to point out that there are probalby less important areas that can be cut back, intead of ICT. That is not to say that TA's aren't important as I know they are and they work very hard for very low pay!

 

D

 

I think the point you're trying to make is that your core IT infrastructure (particularly servers, network hardware) is pretty much a fixed cost, it doesn't change much with differing numbers of users.

 

But if you have fewer kids to teach, then it's a pretty simply logic, however harsh, to say that fewer people will be required to teach them.

Posted (edited)

I got our tech to write down every OEM license onto our inventory or photograph it...

 

Get a contractor in for a few days to help you.. a few hundred £ vs £££ and all that ... but of course, that wont help with the lost serials because the kids peeled them off :-P

 

Linux is not something you could do lightly, based on our ICT teachers they'd probably leave, if it isn't in Access, Publisher or Excel then they don't do it... I daren't think about other issues with software like SIMS, that app the English teacher bought without telling you etc & and that dodgy piece of software the spanish teacher uses...

 

In terms of shell, something that takes focus on startup of your used account, infront of task bar and asks for network credentials... maps drives based on it, log out could be a tray app or a desktop shortcut.

 

Anyway, challenges are great... although, you have an absolute monster of a challenge let alone with training - people are very resistant to change! I imagine you'll come up with something smart :-)

Edited by dwhyte85
Posted
You are not getting any answers from anyone who has made the move to *nix - would it be useful to move this to the *nix forum or ask the question there?
Posted

What would you do about all the course materials that are written for M$ Office?

 

I think the point you're trying to make is that your core IT infrastructure (particularly servers, network hardware) is pretty much a fixed cost, it doesn't change much with differing numbers of users.

 

But if you have fewer kids to teach, then it's a pretty simply logic, however harsh, to say that fewer people will be required to teach them.

 

It's like you read my mind Steve :-D

Posted
You are not getting any answers from anyone who has made the move to *nix - would it be useful to move this to the *nix forum or ask the question there?

 

I was just about to PM you to ask to do just that. Could you please do so? :)

Posted
What would you do about all the course materials that are written for M$ Office?

 

We are a middle school - there are no such course materials. We are getting rid of ICT as a discrete subject also, so it will be a cross-curriculum subject instead (everyone doing stuff relevant to them).

Posted

There is another option, and i know some schools have done it, others don't like doing it, but it is an option... Buy out of the annual licensing. the cost is 1.5x the annual cost, but would leave you with a full system, for 12k, and no costs next year, with minimal disruption.

 

As a middle ground, buyout the windows licenses, and the few office licenses you require, and dump the rest for Open source solution.

 

I have been in a similar situation here, where we have outdated or missing information for MS licensing, and a reluctance to pay the annual costs to upgrade to new versions. There has been a suggestion to move to Open source solutions, but the honest answer is I am not trained to support them, I have no experience in supporting them, and as such I cannot recommend us using them. I am now considering moving to Open Office as a middle ground, but I would prefer to use MS office, as that is what I am used to, and what all the high schools use in my area.

 

The consideration needs to be not just the "now" but the future costs. The costs of training yourself and your other technicians, possibly paying for training for the ICT teachers who have to learn a new system, and then the costs involved in hiring future Technical staff, as people trained and experienced with Linux tend to command much higher salaries than their windows counterparts (There are less of them, therefore higher competition on them!). The Technician/engineer job's I see coming up that request linux technician experience command some £10k more than I currently earn as an average, the average being around the £30k mark for technicians, more for manager level experience. And I'm not just talking about "I know how to install it" But using it client and server side, fault finding and being able to support others in using it.

 

Also worth considering, is issues with software compatibility, and Printer drivers; The engineer from my photocopier manufacturer informed me that their print drivers do not support 64 bit Server OS's! Some of the other kit would just be a nightmare to get working correctly.

 

I hate to add further weight to what is already a troubled situation, and though it is possible, and there probably is some school(s) that have done this, but it is a very drastic option in my opinion, and one that can be worked around in other ways.

 

I hope what I have said is of some use.

Posted

comments from others on this post aside here are some linux type ideas - I'll though I'll preference these with the fact I work in a windows only college and haven't had the chance to put them to practise.

 

If you switch desktop machines to something like ubuntu you can install likewise which will let you connect to a windows domain and authenticate to it. This will let you keep your active directory - although you will still need to have cals for each machine that connects. you'll then need to find replacements for programs and get people used to them and used to teaching them - for example a switch to open office is all very well but the school will likely be geared to teaching MS office so there's going to have to be some time invested there.

 

as for the server side; file shareing and web servers are pretty easy but LDAP to replace AD can be a lot of hard work. You might want to look at a system like 'ebox' or 'clearos' and consider something like 'untangle' for a firewall.

 

I'm assuming that you have some good Linux knowledge and experience. I wouldn't embarked on this path with the intention of learning as you go.

 

On other option is to look at the live.edu and google appas for education offerings. This would let you run Linux or windows on the desktops and so long as they have access to the internet you'd be able to access email, word processing and file storage

Posted
What do you mean, your not going to have ICT dedicated lessons?

 

D

 

ICT will no longer be taught as 'ICT'. Instead, all the bits of it will be split out to the subject areas where they are most relevant and those subjects will cover them as part of their own curriculum. This is happening all over the country...

Posted
I'm assuming that you have some good Linux knowledge and experience. I wouldn't embarked on this path with the intention of learning as you go.

 

Indeed I do, but just not in a school environment. I've got a lot of experience of home systems, and running linux dns/mail/web servers (and phone systems).

Posted (edited)
ICT will no longer be taught as 'ICT'. Instead, all the bits of it will be split out to the subject areas where they are most relevant and those subjects will cover them as part of their own curriculum. This is happening all over the country...

 

What will happen to all the ICT Teachers, I must not be up on this development yet, has my head been in the sand?

Edited by danrhodes
Posted
Define 'front end'. Also, OEM means 'no volume install', meaning no imaging, and having to keep track of 250 OEM keys - some of which will be long gone from their labels which the kids love to peel off.

 

"Log in" front end on top of Windows XP Home (i.e. a script or application that asks for a username and password and connects user's drives and so on): tried it, not a great success, wouldn't really recommend it. There was some talk of being able to replace the default Windows login application with your own custom one, but that struck me as rather unreliable and (possibly) had licensing issues anyway. Windows XP Home clients would still need CALs to connect drives anyway.

 

Imaging OEM copies of Windows XP: that's what we do. We have a copy of System Rescue CD on every workstation that can save / restore an image from a central file server. Rather long-winded to set each workstation up, but does allow you fine control as to the exact drivers / configuration you want for each workstation. Restoring a Windows XP image generally involves restoring the machine from an image, then you have to disjoin and re-join the machine to the domain as its security identifier will be out of date - you can do a whole classroom in half an hour or so, but it's not quite a simple leave-them-to-restore operation. We have basic images for each machine, with drivers and so on installed, then we install software on workstations after re-imaging. We use a script to do this, but it seems to work okay via GPO too. Obviously, bit of a problem if you only have Windows XP Home or have lost the license keys from machines. Could you get license keys back via some license-key finding disk that looks at a Windows XP install and figures out its key?

 

Joining any machine (XP Home, Pro or Linux-with-Samba) to your domain (or even having them authenticate occasionally) requires a CAL for that machine. This strikes me as an excellent reason to avoid Active Directory. Unfortunatly, Samba really isn't up to acting as a domain controller yet / still.

 

I would switch classroom machines to being Linux-based, authenticating against an LDAP server or similar. Keep one small DC for a Terminal Services machine to authenticate against so you can run SIMS over Terminal Services for a limited number of users. Remember you need an Office CAL for each machine using MS Office, so that'll probably mean any machine that accesses the TS server to run SIMS. Might want to set up an OpenVPN to run SIMS over, that way there's no argument as to which machines are running SIMS / MS Office and you have a nice, secture way opf letting remote users access SIMS.

 

For ease of workstation management, Ubuntu is nice and easy to install and you can have it auto-update and so on. However, you could look at using LTSP to deliver an OS image to each workstation over the network. LTSP now lets you use some applications locally, so you could dish out a Linux distribution to each machine that ran Firefox with Flash locally and then connected to a thin client server for other stuff.

 

The above is rather where I'm aiming our system as it is - we have no budget for ICT, and have to do everything as cheaply as possible.

 

--

David Hicks

Posted
I got our tech to write down every OEM license onto our inventory or photograph it...

 

That's a good idea - wish I'd come accross that one before!

 

Get a contractor in for a few days to help you.

 

For the whole contracting / training stuff, surley that's what the Internet, Google, StackOverflow and, of course, EduGeek is for - if you don't know the naswer to something, go and look it up or ask how to do it.

 

--

David Hicks

Posted (edited)

I meant the initial deployment / crossover dhicks :-)

 

And you could script a product key change based on the mac address of the machine... thus, if you had in your inventory the OEM license & mac adds you could pair it that way... it's alot of effort though, i am glad i'm not yet in that position.

 

I think he wants some unix loving & if he succesfully does this... it'd a fantastic medal of honor & save his school some cash, should document as he goes if he does it :p

Edited by dwhyte85
Posted
What will happen to all the ICT Teachers, I must not be up on this development yet, has my head been in the sand?

 

Our ICT specialist is moving into a different subject area.

Posted

For the thin client part you might also want to look at Ulteo who provide thin client/ web OS with MS program integration

 

An other option would be to ditch the Citrix/ thin client side altogether and use virtual box or similar to run a virutal machine on those desktops that need access to sims. You'd need machine with enough ram and also you'd have to update those vms manually though

Posted
I meant the initial deployment / crossover dhicks :-)

 

Oh yes, of course. Hey, I'm always available if the price is right :-) Seriously, though... how much of our problem is simply never having enough time to get stuff sorted quickly enough so people can come back and use the network in a reasonable time? Would some sort of summer-time expertise / labour swap / merry-go-round be a good idea?

 

And you could script a product key change based on the mac address of the machine... thus, if you had in your inventory the OEM license & mac adds you could pair it that way...

 

Tried that, too - image the machine disjoined from the network and with registry settings so it auto-boots to local admin account, use newsid to join it to the network when it first boots up, write some registry settings so it no longer auto-boots. Bit of a palavar, again.

 

--

David Hicks

Posted
An other option would be to ditch the Citrix/ thin client side altogether and use virtual box or similar to run a virutal machine on those desktops that need access to sims.

 

Just from experience, I'd say the easiest, simplest and most secure way to run SIMS is over Terminal Services. That's whether you're doing so from a Linux workstation or just because you fancy it being easier to manage.

 

--

David Hicks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...