Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been given a quote for a new server.

 

The spec is as follows..

 

It's an NEC

Xeon Quad Core X3330 (2.66GHz)

4GB DDR2

5 x 146GB SAS HDD

Megaraid SAS RAID Controller

then the usual, DVD drive, USB Floppy Drive, Keyboard & Mouse

3 Year on site warranty

 

We are a 3 form entry Primary school about 100 client computers and a lot of staff. It is going to be are only server for the curriculum and i want it to do everything you use a good server for and future proof.

 

So, are they trying to get more money out of me or do you think this is suitable? This isnt some random company this is someone our council recommends we use.

 

Be nice!!

 

Thanks

Posted

Sounds about right, although I would be tempted to put the memory up to 8Gb depending on what you are going to run on it. How much are they asking for it?

Also, how are you going to back this up? Might be worth getting a tape drive in it.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
I would also not buy NEC Computer hardware with them pulling the desktops and notebooks out of the UK sector I personally, despite what they have said, not buy any server kit either as if that doesn't take off well (which lets face it HP, Dell & IBM are the top dogs here talking overall servers) they will be the next to go and could leave you with a box with dodgy warranty support.
  • Thanks 2
Posted
Ah, thanks for pointing that out John. My supplier says they do the NEC repairs as well so i might double check this situation with them. If things were to go tits up Link2ICT are there to back me up too, but i will check this out.
Posted
it's definately a good server, just seems a little over priced for a primary school, but if you have the budget then fair enough. The cost you've been quoted would wipe the budget out in our school for the year.
Posted (edited)

I don't think I understand the question: There exists the possibility for a computer system that is too fast? :)

 

Anyhow, how may students does your school have and what kind of applications are going to be running on it, any possibility of database driven central apps, VLEs, Exchange.

 

Personally I would be looking for redundant PSUs and as suggested a chunk more RAM incase you want any shared DB stuff or VMs for VLE/Monitering Linux VMs. I would also be making sure that the RAM is ECC for acceptable stability. I would also seriously look at the RAID controller as this will be the great decider in data access speed and data reliability. I would be looking at a RAID controller with an absolute bare minimum of 128mb of cache, prefferably more and battery backed.

 

I would also be inclined to find out how much a dual CPU socket variation would be just in case. About 5 years ago when specing for a school we ended up getting a couple of hp ML350s with dual, dual core xeons and upgraded raid controllers. One pretty much handled exchange and the other files and ds/printer roles. This worked out about right for just over 100 workstations so the four cores will probably do it but I would investigate having the easy ability to add four more with a dual socket board.

 

In the end it does depend on your budget but I would suggest getting the system as fast as the budget allow now because it will only get slower (comparitivly) as time goes on and it is easier to add the upgrades or support for them at the start than attempting to tack them on afterwards in most situations.

Edited by SYNACK
Posted

Spec sounds plenty for a primary with 100 pcs. You should only think about 8GB RAM if you're going to virtualise a couple of PCs (ESXi is free and pretty good) or will be installing 64bit server software.

 

How much have they quoted and which company? (PM if you dont want to shout it out) I've not always been too impressed with Link2Ict's "recommended" companies / products.

Posted

Budget - it wont completely wipe me out, but it is a very large chunk of it. But it needs doing, if not this financial year then next (if our current one will carry us that far!). So i dont think i have a choice.

 

Back up will be a 1TB NAS device

 

Looking at the spec the Raid has 128mb Cache!

 

BrianG. Hope you dont think i didnt trust your opinion, just wanted to open it up to the whole forum.

 

Feeling a lot better about it now...lol

Posted

whats wrong with the likes of Dell, ( Not sure about HP ? ) or maybe IBM ?

 

Think there was mention of sun servers a while ago on edugeek - dunno - just thought I would throw a few things in there to mix it up a bit lol

Posted

lol this is what i've been quoted, im going to mention the whole NEC thing to them tomorrow, see what they say.

 

Lol when i say is this more then i need, i meant i didnt want to be paying for something that was too highly spec'ed for our needs!

Posted
whats wrong with the likes of Dell, ( Not sure about HP ? ) or maybe IBM ?

 

Think there was mention of sun servers a while ago on edugeek - dunno - just thought I would throw a few things in there to mix it up a bit lol

Nothing overall that I know, I'm a HP fan myself (being converted slowly over to Sun :) ) my concern is over the overall risk of NEC removing the server business from the UK market as they did the desktops and laptops business due to the falling sales. They have said they want to focus on the Servers which is fine except I've never seen an NEC server anywhere I've been, so they are not popular in SME and Education that I've seen. I am sure the spec is good and its probably well built, the desktops certainly were that I've come across, but my view is the long-term risk of the investment in the Server that may 2 years down the 3 or 5 year warranty be then problematic in getting support and any specific parts for it if they pull that out of that sector as well.

Posted (edited)
Looks like a good spec, I'd consider getting a 2nd CPU in there, the hdd space is probably more than you'll need so if money's an issue it may be worth dropping a drive, 438Gb should be ok for a long while yet(or atleast it has been in nearly every primary I've been to) Edited by Jamman960
Posted
lol this is what i've been quoted, im going to mention the whole NEC thing to them tomorrow, see what they say.

 

Lol when i say is this more then i need, i meant i didnt want to be paying for something that was too highly spec'ed for our needs!

 

Little Miss , how much have you been quoted , would be great for your school if we can beat the price with say a HP or Dell equivilent , again I would be careful with NEC with there current state of business.:cool:

Posted

It would probably be worthwhile getting some quotes for HP/Dell/IBM equivalents off our friendly suppliers on here ;)

If you want to go rackmount, then you could also try Andy @ Cutter (Linescanner) for a Sun box.

Personnally I would stick with HP/Dell/IBM/Sun as they all have good rep and a lot of people on here use them, so help would be at hand.

Posted

Spec looks about right to me, its very similar to a couple we installed a few months back for similar sized schools and it runs very nicely.

 

As a guide, for a very similar spec'd dell server (slightly slower cpu, but with dual psu's, 6gb of ram and 4 year warranty) we paid a touch under £1800.

 

Steve

Posted (edited)

We have just been quoted £2000 for a quad core Xeon HP ML125 (?) with 4 500Gb SATA drives with one spare (from memory) and 4GB memory

Please be very wary of going for any more memory - if you go up we have been told by more than one supplier that we would have to go up to the 64 bit operating system and printer drivers and some primary school software - specially the old stuff we seem to specialise in won't work with it. So we are sticking to 4GB for now with the ability to upgrade in future

Don't forget that SAS drives are quite a lot more than SATAs so you must take that into account.

Check your warranty - We have 3 years on the server but it doesn't cover the drives.(only emerged in the course of a discussion)

Edited by witch
  • Thanks 1
Posted
We have just been quoted £2000 for a quad core Xeon HP ML125 (?) with 4 500Gb SATA drives with one spare (from memory) and 4GB memory

Please be very wary of going for any more memory - if you go up we have been told by more than one supplier that we would have to go up to the 64 bit operating system and printer drivers and some primary school software - specially the old stuff we seem to specialise in won't work with it. So we are sticking to 4GB for now with the ability to upgrade in future

Don't forget that SAS drives are quite a lot more than SATAs so you must take that into account.

Check your warranty - We have 3 years on the server but it doesn't cover the drives.(only emerged in the course of a discussion)

That's strange, my HP ML370s always had 3 year drive warranties if bought with the server at the same time (which they always were), if the server had 5 years they then had 5 years, again if bought at the same time and I had them swapped that way for ages with no problems. Maybe they have removed that with the newer SAS drives as this was on U320 15K SCSI ones.

 

As for the 4GB Ram, you can use 32bit Enterprise Edition Server 2003 which will see more than 4GB Ram Witch, it splits it up and uses it for various things, I have 8GB in 2 DCs at work and they pick it up fine but it does have to be Enterprise Edition. I also believed that it was 4GB max, but I was shown wrong by the MS website and its just a change to the boot.ini file, reboot the Server and voilla 8GB usable ram for Windows.

 

Large memory support is available in Windows Server 2003 and in Windows 2000 to the MS Knowledge to give you the speele on it :)

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Ooh, thats interesting, i got told 4Gb was the maximum that 2003 can see but apparently Birmingham isnt feeding out 2008 yet.

Perfect for you then Little Miss :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...