Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally i am a fan of Smoothwall but i have one school using Sonic.

Anyone offer me some views on either?

I don't like the sonic unit form what i can see so far but i am open to be persuaded!

Posted

Do you mean SonicWALL?

 

I've used both, I used the SonicWALL UTM product about two years ago and I'm using the Smoothwall UTM now. In my experience, SonicWALL is a MUCH better firewall and Smoothwall is a much better filter.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
We're using SonicWALL here and it's maturing a lot but I would absolutely agree with Norphy, Smoothwall (used it in my last school) is an excellent filter but a little lacking in firewall/routing (in 2014) in comparison to the SonicWALL which is very well featured in terms of routing/firewalling but the filter is a little clunky. They are improving this though.
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Although the firewall and routing sections have improved in Inverness/Kenilworth, they are still way behind where SonicWALL was two years ago. But that's not surprising really, SonicWALL have been doing firewalls since the year dot and Smoothwall are first and foremost a filtering company.
  • Thanks 1
Posted

We have both here.

 

Smoothwall - Good filter poor firewall

Sonicwall - Poor filter good firewall.

 

We use Sonicwall at the perimeter and Smoothwall for the interior.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
From what I know, added to what I've heard, Smoothwall is the better filter for sure but the reporting required to meet KCSIE and Prevent guidelines puts the Sonicwall & Fastvue product ahead. Added to this, the Sonicwall is a far superior firewall.
  • Thanks 1
Posted
From what I know, added to what I've heard, Smoothwall is the better filter for sure but the reporting required to meet KCSIE and Prevent guidelines puts the Sonicwall & Fastvue product ahead. Added to this, the Sonicwall is a far superior firewall.

So does the smoothwall 'fail' KCSIE requirements?

Posted
From what I know, added to what I've heard, Smoothwall is the better filter for sure but the reporting required to meet KCSIE and Prevent guidelines puts the Sonicwall & Fastvue product ahead. Added to this, the Sonicwall is a far superior firewall.

 

I'd be interested in expansion of this.

Posted

Hi,

 

I know I've already met some of you but for those who haven't I'm product manager responsible for the Firewall here at Smoothwall.

 

We're busy working on introducing IPv6 support at the moment and I'm always looking to hear about what ideas, improvements or features you'd see in a firewall!

 

Feel free to drop me PM on here with suggestions or to arrange a chat sometime, it would be great hear your feedback even if you're not using Smoothwall firewall at the moment.

 

Regards,

Chris

Posted

 

Sorry, not sure how this supports your statement as they have both self certified themselves as meeting requirements. The only difference is Smoothwall seem to have marked themselves more critically whereas SonicWall seems to have misunderstood the question when asked about reporting mechanisms.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks everyone - this has clarified my thoughts.

To summarise - smoothwall is excellent for filtering and the product team are updating the paper work to demonstrate the KCSIE stuff.

Sonicwall is a great firewall but not so hot on the filtering side.

 

Reality is that we should have both a firewall and filtering system in place.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...