Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
... but it's the same price as the 13" MacBook Pro Retina which now has 5th gen i5, bigger screen with higher resolution, better graphics and better battery life. That is before you double the RAM to 16GB. 0.2" thickness and 1.4lb difference isn't that much more.
Posted

Maybe I'm just a little disappointed... I was hoping it would come in at the $900-$1000 like some of the other devices in that market. For instance Lenovo's Yoga 3 Pro has a better resolution, touch screen, foldable-ness, etc. and it has been available for months at $1200. Asus has convertible devices slated to come out soon too at the $800-$900 with the More M and 8GB.

 

I think that, unless you have withered muscles and require a Mac, the MacBook isn't the cleverest choice right now.

Posted

It's technically impressive... But one port for everything? An adapter required if you want to do more than just charge the device?

 

http://m.quickmeme.com/img/29/2972efdcba6c090f9b6350701f757631809ace50996a05d79d32a95e94d7af00.jpg

Posted
Core M? Eww.

 

What's wrong with the Core M? We have some tablets based on that, it's not a performance powerhouse but it is more than fast enough for the vast majority of purposes

Posted

I like how crap the specs are. I like how the old Air is thicker than the original Air but hang on the new Macbook is thinner that that but thicker than the original, which was the thinnest notebook ever except those other ones. Can't see the benefit of that key mechanism. Hating Apple a little bit more each day.

 

No doubt this, and the Watch will sell bucketloads to the starbucks crowd.

Posted (edited)
What's wrong with the Core M? We have some tablets based on that, it's not a performance powerhouse but it is more than fast enough for the vast majority of purposes

 

More that at that price i'd expect a little more. :confused:

 

 

Absolutely gorgeous machine however.

Edited by ellsandell
Posted
Maybe I'm just a little disappointed... I was hoping it would come in at the $900-$1000 like some of the other devices in that market. For instance Lenovo's Yoga 3 Pro has a better resolution, touch screen, foldable-ness, etc. and it has been available for months at $1200. Asus has convertible devices slated to come out soon too at the $800-$900 with the More M and 8GB.

 

I think that, unless you have withered muscles and require a Mac, the MacBook isn't the cleverest choice right now.

 

 

Let's not forget Ric that this is Apple. Reality is supposed to become a bit blurry at this point.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
I like how crap the specs are. I like how the old Air is thicker than the original Air but hang on the new Macbook is thinner that that but thicker than the original, which was the thinnest notebook ever except those other ones. Can't see the benefit of that key mechanism. Hating Apple a little bit more each day.

 

No doubt this, and the Watch will sell bucketloads to the starbucks crowd.

What's wrong with Starbucks?

Posted
Can't see the benefit of that key mechanism.

 

From the Apple website:

 

Butterfly mechanism

Traditional keyboards use a scissor mechanism, which tends to wobble around the edges. This creates a lack of precision when you strike anywhere except the center of the key. We needed to reduce key wobbling for a keyboard this thin; otherwise, striking a key off-center could result in the keycap hitting bottom before a keystroke registers. So we designed an entirely new butterfly mechanism, which is wider than the scissor mechanism and has a single assembly made from a stiffer material — allowing for a more stable, responsive key that takes up less vertical space. This innovative design improves stability, uniformity, and control — no matter where you press on the key.

 

Might be complete house manure but that's their public reasoning

Posted
There's nothing wrong with the Core M. It depends what you want to use the machine for - the Core M is a lot lighter on your battery than an i5 and is equivalent to a bottom end 4th gen i5 (just - if you get the wind behind it). If I had to have a Mac though, I'd get the one with the the 5th gen i5 and put up with the extra weight (which is all batteries by the looks of those stats for battery life).
Posted (edited)
Also... No DisplayPort adapter? That's a step backwards. Especially considering that DisplayPort can be tunnelled over USB 3.1 like it can be with thunderbolt Edited by Norphy
Posted

As I've already said, I don't particularly like it only having one port to do everything but to say that it isn't a fully functional laptop out of the box is being pretty hyperbolic. When you look at the typical usage of a laptop, it's generally just used on its own without any additional peripherals. Most people won't plug them into an external monitor or into a wired network connection. The only really annoying thing is that you'd need a passive adapter to plug a USB stick into the thing, at least until type c sticks come along.

 

It's clearly unsuitable for anyone who wants to use it professionally but for their main market it's probably no worse than the rest of the range. I realise that's damning it with faint praise as far as your concerned but not everyone has the same requirements or preferences as you or me when it comes to hardware. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that either, if someone likes the look of this then good for them.

Posted (edited)
So what's the actual amount one would have to pay to have a *fully functional laptop*?

I'm sure third-party USB 3.1 Type-C adapters and cables will be available soon from China for a lot less than Apple want for theirs. Just be patient. :)

 

In a few decades time we won't even need VGA adapters. Everything will be wireless! ;)

 

Also... No DisplayPort adapter? That's a step backwards.

I think a DisplayPort adapter will be released at a later date (April?).

 

http://a.pomf.se/jrjsnk.png

 

The only really annoying thing is that you'd need a passive adapter to plug a USB stick into the thing, at least until type c sticks come along.

SanDisk has announced a flash drive that works with both standard and Type-C ports. I suppose in the interim most new USB 3.1 flash drives will have both ports?

 

SanDisk Announces 32GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive With Both Full-Size And Type-C Connectors

Edited by Arthur
Posted (edited)
Oooooo haters gonna hate

 

Pah!

You weren't here when the iPad was announced. Boy did groupthink take a hold that day and were we ever wrong! :)

Edited by Dos_Box
  • Thanks 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...