LeightonJames Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Erm..... Thor is to become Woman?? BBC News - Marvel Comics recasts superhero Thor - as a woman
Gatt Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 How the heck are they gonna explain that!? A whole series of comics about Thor going through a Gender Re-assignment op?!
LeMarchand Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Hey - Thor has been a frog, so why not? See #5 here.
localzuk Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 How the heck are they gonna explain that!? A whole series of comics about Thor going through a Gender Re-assignment op?! Its a reboot sort of thing. So she just is a woman...
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 (edited) Thor is to become Woman?? No. Thor is no longer worthy of Mjölnir and the new wielder is a woman. The thing is... The people writing this don't understand how it works. Thor is Thor. It's just his name. Having the hammer gives you the power of Thor, but it doesn't make you Thor. Like Beta Ray Bill. Had the hammer, had the powers... Still not Thor. Also, Thor girl. And why can't these people make their own damn characters instead of changing existing ones for the purposes of "inclusion"? See also: Muslim Ms. Marvel and Hispanic Spider-Man. Edited July 16, 2014 by X-13
abillybob Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 No. Thor is no longer worthy of Mjölnir and the new wielder is a woman. The thing is... The people writing this don't understand how it works. Thor is Thor. It's just his name. Having the hammer gives you the power of Thor, but it doesn't make you Thor. Like Beta Ray Bill. Had the hammer, had the powers... Still not Thor. Also, Thor girl. And why can't these people make their own damn characters instead of changing existing ones for the purposes of "inclusion"? But only Thor can pick up the hammer
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 But only Thor can pick up the hammer Only those worthy of the power can.
Gatt Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Only those worthy of the power can. So nobody now then?
featured_spectre Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Thor has been a great many things. He's been a frog, he has been transformed into at least 4 different human forms I can think of (Dr. Donald Blake, Jake Olson, Eric Masterson, Sigurd Jarlson), he has been a zombie. Alternate realities have included where Jane Foster found Donald Blakes walking stick and became Thor (in female form).
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 So nobody now then? Only if nobody means: Beta Ray Bill Capitan America Storm Thunderstrike Odin Half a dozen alien robuts. The reanimated soul of Nova. ...and [literally] Earth.
abillybob Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Only if nobody means: abillybob Beta Ray Bill Capitan America Storm Thunderstrike Odin Half a dozen alien robuts. The reanimated soul of Nova. ...and [literally] Earth. Fixed for you
Oaktech Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 I think that as geeks we may be too wrapped up in this to note what a huge step towards positive powerful female role models comics have just taken...
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 I think that as geeks we may be too wrapped up in this to note what a huge step towards positive powerful female role models comics have just taken... It would have been more effective if they had put in the effort to make new characters instead of changing existing ones. ...we all know they'll just change them back once the novelty wears off. Also, female Loki > everything.
localzuk Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 The thing is, the world of comic books is filled with buff men as super-heros. They're nearly all white men also. How do you break the cycle? People want to read what they know, so introducing new comic books is harder than fixing the homogeneous blob that already exists. Switching genders or races for existing characters might be jarring to long term readers but its a good thing to level the market out and make it more interesting overall!
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Switching genders or races for existing characters might be jarring to long term readers but its a good thing to level the market out and make it more interesting overall! It's also lazy writing and has been done and undone so many times it doesn't mean anything.
sted Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 No. And why can't these people make their own damn characters instead of changing existing ones for the purposes of "inclusion"? the same reason ever film/tv program appears to be a remake its cheap you have a guranteed audience and its cheap
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 (edited) found this on Twitter [ATTACH=CONFIG]25669[/ATTACH] I'm rolling my eyes super hard. Most of the responses to that are pointing out that he's missed the point. It's nothing to do with "I hate women superheroes!" it's about rewriting an established character for no damn reason. Edited July 16, 2014 by X-13
MrMat Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 I'm rolling my eyes super hard. Most of the responses to that are pointing out that he's missed the point. It's nothing to do with "I hate women superheroes!" it's about rewriting an established character for no damn reason. What she said !! ^^ It's like changing James Bond into Janet Bond... the female spy who drinks her Vodka Martini stirred not shaken. It would be ridiculous, lazy and just down right awful. Where as a new original movie about a kickass female spy (or if say Black Widow got her own movie...mmmmm Scarlet)...well that would be awesome.
X-13 Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 (edited) It's like changing James Bond into Janet Bond... the female spy who drinks her Vodka Martini stirred not shaken. To be fair, some people theorise that "James Bond" is a pseudonym tied to "007". So there could be a "Jane Bond" if a female agent draws "007". OMG @X-13 @MrMat called you a she GO! I'll allow it. Fits with the theme of the thread. Edited July 16, 2014 by X-13
abillybob Posted July 16, 2014 Posted July 16, 2014 I'll allow it. Fits with the theme of the thread. You know what everyday that goes by I get more and more disappointed with you *shakes head in shame*
Garacesh Posted July 17, 2014 Posted July 17, 2014 What she said !! ^^ OMG @X-13 @MrMat called you a she GO! I'm not entirely sure @X-13 has ever been expressively clear about his/her/its their sex. And gender's a whole different kettle of fish and we're not opening that can of worms again D: Never really been a massive comic book fan, personally. I like superheroes.. Ish? I have a passive interest in them, I suppose. But this is just bizarre. I don't mind female super heroes (one of the reasons I'm actually a huge X-Men fan.. but still passively) and admittedly they could make this work if they did it properly.. If you can only wield Thor's hammer if you're deemed worthy, then all the current Thor (for the purposes of this thread, He-Thor) has to do is something to make him unworthy. The traditional 'Hero's spectacular fall from grace'. Or, if that would be too out-of-character, just have him die. Conjure up a plausible way for the Hammer to be delivered to the new Thor (She-Thor) and you're golden.. However it does diminish the idea of Thor as a superhero from the 'chosen one' who is able to wield the hammer, to just another title passed down to whoever has it at the time. If He-Thor dies and She-Thor takes over, picking up the title, then it doesn't render everything He-Thor has done irrelevant, but still alters it just enough that it's.. Not the same. Would've been better writing a new superhero, IMO.
Arthur Posted July 17, 2014 Posted July 17, 2014 http://mashable.com/2014/07/17/marvels-next-captain-america-will-be-black
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now