Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Must admit I got a cheap LG 46" a few months back and its been excellent. Only cost £400 because I didnt need any of that smart tv rubbish (use xbmc).

 

Its much better than my old Samsung anyway.

Posted
LG had the best filetype support when I was buying my last one but the colour reproduction was no where near as good as the Samsung or the sony, The sony had rubbish filetype support and all sorts of random restrictions which is probably why they were so much cheaper so they could move the things.
Posted (edited)
I've got a dumb 32" LG TV which I'm happy enough with. However, I'm not sure I'd ever buy one of their smart TVs and connect it to a network connection because they have a horrible habit of phoning home your viewing habits even when you expressly tell them not to

 

Quote from a comment at the bottom of that article:

I miss the good old days of "If you aren't paying for a product, you are the product." Now, the new paradigm is: "By using our stuff, we own your data. All of it."

Couldn't agree more (Also this article highlights many reasons why I wouldn't plug a TV onto my network).

I don't want a TV that can download programs from the internet, I have a laptop and a HDMI cable which provides me with a metric butt-tonne more security. I don't want a TV with a microphone and a camera, because I have a webcam on my PC for that, or my tablet if I want to move around. I don't want a TV that can analyse what I watch and recommend me things I might like advertisements studios have paid for. I don't want a TV that can stream media from my PC. I don't want a TV with a web browser.

 

I don't I just want a TV. Just a regular TV. That picks up broadcasted signals. If you want to be nice, give me a built-in DVD player, HDMI/DVI ports, maybe Composite/YPbPr. If you wanna be real fancy, give me a USB port for portable media and a SCART for older consoles nobody uses anymore. Don't insist I plug my TV into the internet. Don't try and siphon off my viewing habits. Don't try and thrust gimmicky additions upon me.

 

*sigh*

Edited by Garacesh
Posted
Just as a tangent ... if you want to help save the planet look at the power consumption .... I bought a Phillips 55 inch recently ... great picture but also A++ power rating.
Posted (edited)
Not to hi jack this thread but I need some suggestions ref a telly ( 1080p , ideally smart tv, not sure ref 3D and aprox 40" and around the £400 uk pound mark )

 

Thanks

 

My other edugeek post : http://www.edugeek.net/forums/general-chat/137431-won-kit-guru-competition-however-4.html

 

I reckon: £390 but no Smart functionality: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-UE42F5000AKXXU-42-inch-Widescreen-1080p/dp/B00BTG8AR4/

or £425 with Smart TV: http://www.amazon.co.uk/LG-42LB580V-42-inch-Widescreen-Freeview/dp/B00J3328KA/

 

EDIT: You know what, actually - best I can see is at Currys - £350 for a Panasonic. No Smart TV, but if you're connecting your PC then it's no great loss. Full HD, Freeview HD, £100 cheaper than Amazon and £50 cheaper than at eBuyer, and Panasonics are almost always top in terms of picture quality.

Edited by sonofsanta
  • Thanks 1
Posted
I reckon: £390 but no Smart functionality: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-UE42F5000AKXXU-42-inch-Widescreen-1080p/dp/B00BTG8AR4/

or £425 with Smart TV: http://www.amazon.co.uk/LG-42LB580V-42-inch-Widescreen-Freeview/dp/B00J3328KA/

 

EDIT: You know what, actually - best I can see is at Currys - £350 for a Panasonic. No Smart TV, but if you're connecting your PC then it's no great loss. Full HD, Freeview HD, £100 cheaper than Amazon and £50 cheaper than at eBuyer, and Panasonics are almost always top in terms of picture quality.

@sonofsanta - what about this one which is 3D or dont bother with 3D ??

 

[h=1]LG 42LA620V - http://www.amazon.co.uk/LG-42LA620V-Widescreen-Freeview-Built-In/dp/B00BS55NB2/ref=pd_sim_sbs_recht_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=0XCTN6H1TSFKRQ933K2D[/h]

 

on ebuyer linky is : http://www.ebuyer.com/500671-lg-42la620v-42-3d-smart-tv-42la620v

Posted
I like the look of that LG one that was none 3D with the thin border etc - just wondering if 3D would be worth it as can watch 3D blu rays on it etc or just get the one you linked to ( none 3D ) ??
Posted
I like the look of that LG one that was none 3D with the thin border etc - just wondering if 3D would be worth it as can watch 3D blu rays on it etc or just get the one you linked to ( none 3D ) ??

 

from experience i have a tv that does 3d (and a laptop for that matter) and ive used it once its a novelty thing with no real application dosent add anything to a film ive got it because the tv that i wanted happened to have 3d

  • Thanks 1
Posted

If you're going to go 3D, the LG Cinema 3D (passive 3D) is the way to go - glasses that cost £1, not £100, lots of pairs for your mates, no annoying flicker...

 

That said, I have a 3D LG TV and I reckon I use 3D about twice a year. Nice if it's there as a feature, but don't go out your way to get it.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
If you're going to go 3D, the LG Cinema 3D (passive 3D) is the way to go - glasses that cost £1, not £100, lots of pairs for your mates, no annoying flicker...

 

That said, I have a 3D LG TV and I reckon I use 3D about twice a year. Nice if it's there as a feature, but don't go out your way to get it.

 

I will avoid 3D then

Posted

Having played Playstation and watched 3D films on a TV with active shutter glasses, all i can say is WOW. Yes they weigh and cost a little more than the passive glasses, but with the sharpness and vibrancy of colours is definately worth it. So much better than the cinema using passive glasses.

I always buy my TVs from Richer Sounds with their 5 year guarantee.

Posted
Just as a tangent ... if you want to help save the planet look at the power consumption .... I bought a Phillips 55 inch recently ... great picture but also A++ power rating.

 

If you really want to save the planet don't buy a TV (or projector) at all what with all of the heavy metals and such used in their manufacture that will eventually go into a landfill somewhere.

Posted
I bought an LG 42LN575V last summer from Argos for £450 at the time. 1080p Smart TV, built in freeview HD, built-in wireless so you're not forced to use ethernet to utilise smart/internet features and as far as I'm concerned the picture quality is beautiful and for built-in speakers they're not too bad :) a very good TV all in all and software/firmware updates are active and available with ease, I imagine there are newer models out now though. I'd recommend LG any day!

 

 

I bought this one also, connect it via Ethernet to switch and right click any media file on your PC and play to tv (DNLA) works a treat!

Posted
back in aug i got a tosh 32" smart tv for 300 from john lewis and it does it's job and has all the connections i required 4 hdmi vga Optical SPDIF 2 usb (one is for a hdd) built in recording
Posted
I bought this one also, connect it via Ethernet to switch and right click any media file on your PC and play to tv (DNLA) works a treat!

 

I bought an LG 42LN575V last summer from Argos for £450 at the time. 1080p Smart TV, built in freeview HD, built-in wireless so you're not forced to use ethernet to utilise smart/internet features and as far as I'm concerned the picture quality is beautiful and for built-in speakers they're not too bad :) a very good TV all in all and software/firmware updates are active and available with ease, I imagine there are newer models out now though. I'd recommend LG any day!

 

Taking into consideration the above two quotes / comments / posts

 

What is the difference between these two models of LG Tellys :

 

1) LG 42LN575V

2) LG 42LB580V

 

Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...