Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys.

 

Our LRC is now fully equipped with Lenovo Touchscreen Windows 8.1 machines and we're looking to roll out a few different apps (.appx) which are free from the Windows Store.

 

Having previously had no issues with software deployment (repackaging with Advanced Installer (MSIs), deploying via GPO etc); it looks that this is a bit of a minefield unless you are looking to deploy self-signed / homebrew apps?

 

How are you guys deploying apps (if at all possible)?

 

Our DC is 2008 R2 based however I'm sure we can tie-in the 2012 R2 ADMX templates if required.

 

Any input / guidance would be fantastic :)

 

Cheers,

 

Kyle

Posted

Our LRC is now fully equipped with Lenovo Touchscreen Windows 8.1 machines and we're looking to roll out a few different apps (.appx) which are free from the Windows Store.

 

How are you guys deploying apps (if at all possible)?

 

Firstly, it's great to hear that you're using Windows 8.1! :)

 

Now, on to the slightly tougher bit. Windows Store apps are deployed a little differently to regular applications. Currently, unless you have the whole application package to distribute it's not possible to use SCCM or Intune to push out Windows Store apps to devices - they have to be delivered from the Store. This in turn requires a Microsoft Account.

 

Microsoft has put together a couple of pieces of guidance around this, specific to education, which you might find useful:

 

Download Windows Store Apps - A Deployment Guide for Education from Official Microsoft Download Center

 

Windows RT 8.1 - Deployment Guide for Education

 

Even with Windows 8.1 Update it is a bit trickier than it could be, and I'm confident that in the not-too-distant future things will improve but for now, I'd work with some of the guidance in those links.

Posted

Hi James,

 

I've just read through these "deployment guides" but they basically say the following:

 

You cant install more than 24 apps or you will receive an "error"

You must obtain the appx and licence agreement directly from the developer before attempting to sideload (good luck with that)

Failing this use the "Windows store deployment method" on a per user basis (Is this serious, we have over a thousand users)

 

Is there something we are missing?!

 

Rollon Windows 9 :rolleyes:

Posted
You cant install more than 24 apps or you will receive an "error"

 

You can't include more than 24 in your image, assuming you had 24 .appx packages to use.

 

You must obtain the appx and licence agreement directly from the developer before attempting to sideload (good luck with that)

 

Yup, this is a tough one at the moment, but not impossible. It's always worth approaching a vendor to see if they have a model for sideloaded delivery. Don't forget that this only applies to the full screen "modern" apps; traditional desktop applications are handled in the usual way.

 

Failing this use the "Windows store deployment method" on a per user basis (Is this serious, we have over a thousand users)

 

Again, totally understand how it works in schools - and I promise you that this is heard loud and clear internally, too. I don't have anything I can share about how this will be handled in future, but as soon as I do I'll share it here.

 

Rollon Windows 9 :rolleyes:

 

I suspect my next point will become something I say over and over again...

 

Yes, there are some improvements that could be made to the way you can deploy and manage Windows Store apps; however, that shouldn't stop you from rolling out Windows 8.1 to your devices. Where it is not suitable to manage devices on a 1:1 basis, such as in IT suites, etc. then you could take the steps to turn off the Windows Store and configure the devices to boot to desktop. (Windows 8.1 Update made it a lot easier for keyboard and mouse users)

 

I'm still trying to rationalise my thoughts on this into something bloggable but there are good reasons that deploying Windows 8.1 over Windows 7 is better, beyond any touch-enabled experiences. There will invariably be a Windows v.next (it doesn't have an official name yet) that will iterate and improve on the current version, but the days of skipping versions are a bit behind us - things are improving all the time. IMHO it's more about building the infrastructure to support simple and fast rollouts. A lot has changed since the days of rolling out Windows XP, etc. :)

Posted

So what your saying in a summarised version is it cant be done. :D

 

I've not got a problem with normal Apps, I wanted to try using some of the "modern" apps that MS are pushing. My MS CRM couldnt sing their praises highly enough shame I cant deploy them!

Posted (edited)

@jamesbmarshall you say that MS has heard feedback about actual app deployment will be worked on 'soon', what real timeframe is there on that 'soon' as 8 has been out for some time and had several large updates so far non of which has fixed this major flaw.

 

 

 

We are pushing out Windows 8.1 everywhere at the moment and it is better than 7 but we may well have the purchase of a couple of classrooms worth of MS tablets blocked and have to go for a different brand entirely as we can't wait. This may well lead to MS tablets never being used in that school as they will already be on a different path.

 

 

 

Personally I like the W8 tablets and they can work well but I am not sure MS understands how badly they are doing themselves over with the lack of real management tools to make this work.

Edited by SYNACK
Posted
@jamesbmarshall you say that MS has heard feedback about actual app deployment will be worked on 'soon', what real timeframe is there on that 'soon' as 8 has been out for some time and had several large updates so far non of which has fixed this major flaw.

 

 

 

We are pushing out Windows 8.1 everywhere at the moment and it is better than 7 but we may well have the purchase of a couple of classrooms worth of MS tablets blocked and have to go for a different brand entirely as we can't wait. This may well lead to MS tablets never being used in that school as they will already be on a different path.

 

 

 

Personally I like the W8 tablets and they can work well but I am not sure MS understands how badly they are doing themselves over with the lack of real management tools to make this work.

 

I couldn't of put this any better myself. I've reiterated all this to my MS CRM on numerous occasions. When are MS going to pick up on this. Us Techs are trying to fight your cause!! We want to use the tech in classrooms get the students using it.

 

I'm managing 4 schools over 2000 users it's a resource that we can't tap into that your spending money to make great and we can't use.

Posted
@jamesbmarshall you say that MS has heard feedback about actual app deployment will be worked on 'soon', what real timeframe is there on that 'soon' as 8 has been out for some time and had several large updates so far none of which has fixed this major flaw.

Microsoft are going to make MSIs available "soon" to update the apps included with Windows 8.x. Not sure about third-party apps though. :confused:

Posted

Ah, pretty much everything I needed to know has been answered here (or not as the case may be :rolleyes:).

 

Updating the Apps included with Windows 8 will be of little use / importance to most I would have thought (as typically they're hidden/removed as they're of no use in schools).

 

Guess I'll have to hang fire until some form of managed appx deployment solution surfaces.

 

Thanks everyone for your responses and input!

Posted
Getting the appx files is actually quite easy, I followed the following guide Where is Windows 8's "package cache" for store applications? - Super User and installed from a usb stick , now all I need is to install and figure out sccm ?

 

This doesn't sound like a good idea.

 

Aside from any potential licensing issues this may or may not have, it's unsupported and may affect your ability to update those apps in future.

 

I mean, I get why you'd want to do it... but anything this hacky does not sound good.

Posted
This doesn't sound like a good idea.

 

Aside from any potential licensing issues this may or may not have, it's unsupported and may affect your ability to update those apps in future.

 

I mean, I get why you'd want to do it... but anything this hacky does not sound good.

 

Which makes it doubly sad that it is required in the first place to make the devices usable with metro apps, what's the other option, 600 years of manual creation and meddling with liveIDs or reimaging every device every time you want a new app.

 

I like the tech, but its like there was no thought put into anything other than the marketing agenda and its a long road back to a usable system.

Posted

This just proves why Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 just isn't fit for education or business.

 

Do Microsoft realise how many apps we have installed on iPads? Literally hundreds and this can be cloned and restored accordingly.

 

On Windows 7 workstations, most images I work on have approx. 50 or more applications installed as standard. Why is there any limit at all, it's illogical by design.

Posted
This just proves why Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 just isn't fit for education or business.

It's alright for education and businesses with BYOD schemes where the user logs in with their own Microsoft account.

Posted
It's alright for education and businesses with BYOD schemes where the user logs in with their own Microsoft account.

 

I agree, but we all know education doesn't always use it as was designed by Apple or Microsoft.

 

It reminds me of the silly requirement whereby you can only Sysprep Windows 7 so many times, but then Microsoft have done away with any limit with Windows 8.

 

If Microsoft insist on setting limits when deploying an image, then it should be minimum 100 apps in my opinion. Otherwise (in Microsoft's thinking), you have a beautiful new OS, but few applications to run on it. What's the point?

Posted
It's alright for education and businesses with BYOD schemes where the user logs in with their own Microsoft account.

 

And generally their own device, sorry MS we don't all live in the US where you can buy a tablet for three dollars fifty. Here and I'm sure there, in the poorer areas there is no way the families could afford that. The other route is school owned BYOD which is not really BYOD anymore and the funding for that does not exist unless, like Google here you have a charity that backs them and works out a big hire purchase deal for Chromebooks.

 

If MS is going for this model they have already all but lost it. Every school that has done 1:1 around here that I know of has gone chromebooks, the hardware is junk, the OS is slow but they are manageable and thanks to that and some - I'm sure - 'scrupulous' dealing with the MoE and its OSS zealot advisors GAPS and chromebooks rule here.

 

We have gone 365 in several schools and are trying to go for the MS tablets - as they are faster, more varied uses, better integration with existing systems - but it is a loosing battle, GAPS now has Classrooms for free where as you need to build everything from scratch in sharepoint on 365. They have chromebooks that can be managed for all apps and can login to their school account rather than having to create a separate liveID for every student if we wanted even free apps.

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...