Junior2k

Have had issues with 2012 R2 on VMWare and was advised by VMWare to change to the VMXNet 3 Adaptors in settings fixed all our issues with one click. Hope this helps someone!

I couldn't of put this any better myself. I've reiterated all this to my MS CRM on numerous occasions. When are MS going to pick up on this. Us Techs are trying to fight your cause!! We want to use the tech in classrooms get the students using it. I'm managing 4 schools over 2000 users it's a resource that we can't tap into that your spending money to make great and we can't use.

So what your saying in a summarised version is it cant be done. I've not got a problem with normal Apps, I wanted to try using some of the "modern" apps that MS are pushing. My MS CRM couldnt sing their praises highly enough shame I cant deploy them!

Hi James, I've just read through these "deployment guides" but they basically say the following: You cant install more than 24 apps or you will receive an "error" You must obtain the appx and licence agreement directly from the developer before attempting to sideload (good luck with that) Failing this use the "Windows store deployment method" on a per user basis (Is this serious, we have over a thousand users) Is there something we are missing?! Rollon Windows 9

Thanks for your help with this guys, In the end put in a static route on our Sonicwall. Had major problems getting a gateway route to work on our Sonicwall and their support which is usually good had to go away and try getting it to work as I wanted. Anyway posting here because we stumbled across a way that worked perfectly whilst on the phone to Sonicwall and even they were surprised it seemed to work perfectly. You never know this may help someone else :-) Sonicwall > Network > Routing Add Route Policy Source : Range of addresses to be handed out by DHCP Destination : Any Services : Setup a group for HTTP / HTTPS Gateway : The Transparent Proxy IP Interface : Whichever one is plugged into the LAN Metric : 1 (makes it static) Now that on its own doesn't do anything NAT Policies Original Source - Range of addresses to be handed out by DHCP Translated Source - Original Original Destination - IP of Transparent Proxy Translated Destination - Original Original Service - Same group for HTTP / HTTPS Translated Service - Original Inbound Interface - LAN Interface X1 or whatever your plugged into Outbound Interface - Any Now in my eyes this should do nothing as its not translating anything, but don't ask me why without it their the Route doesn't work simple as. Like I said, I hope this helps someone

Hi Guys, Have a number of Layer 3 HP Procurve Switches and a Core routing Switch. Core switch has IP Route in to forward all general traffic 0.0.0.0 to our Internet Router. So anything it cant route internally fires across to a Sonicwall. If I put in an IP Route for a specific VLAN to forward all gateway traffic to a transparent proxy server on another VLAN and then put in a subsequent loopback to the initial VLAN will it process this rule before the general one do you think? Or will I end up having to put routes in for all the other VLANs as well and ditching the 0.0.0.0 route. Wanted to put in an IP Route 10.20.70.254 - 10.20.30.200 and then put a route in the proxy back to the 10.20.70.x network. Any advice greatly appreciated! Thanks