Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally I'd approach with caution as to the real worth of Royal Mail.. I think this attempt by the Government will be short lived to generate interest.

 

As it stands, Royal Mail are years behind in terms of their tracking technology compared to other companies. The last I checked, I can track a parcel with Royal Mail once it's been delivered. That's really handy isn't it?

 

I'd take Royal Mail more seriously if they came out with a revolutionary policy such as delivering on a Sunday. Many companies/shops and websites are available to purchase on the weekend, so why not deliver on a Saturday and Sunday? No one's tapped into this market and I think the response would be more than positive.

Posted
As it stands, Royal Mail are years behind in terms of their tracking technology compared to other companies. The last I checked, I can track a parcel with Royal Mail once it's been delivered. That's really handy isn't it?

 

As far as I remember it depends on which service you buy. The after it has been delivered I think is the signed for service. I'm sure you can get a blow by blow tracking.

Posted
As far as I remember it depends on which service you buy. The after it has been delivered I think is the signed for service. I'm sure you can get a blow by blow tracking.

 

But clearly it's a poorly thought out service. The step by step tracking is available as standard from all other companies I've come across. The future of Royal Mail is delivering parcels, it won't be delivering letters - so they need to focus on this a lot more. Internet sales are rocketing every year, yet Royal Mail report big losses and requires investment. It just doesn't add up, bearing in mind they're the biggest in the UK.

Posted

Parcels is clearly a huge growth business, and royal mail is in excellent shape to be able to make lots of money out of it.

 

I agree they need to improve their tracking and website simplicity.

 

Those automatic postal machines also need an upgrade. I've used them a few times and the touch screens are so slow.

Posted (edited)
Another typical Tory Sell Off - sok though, we are all in this together according to Dave Country Supper Cameron.onlysaying.jpg Edited by mattx
  • Thanks 1
Posted
But clearly it's a poorly thought out service. The step by step tracking is available as standard from all other companies I've come across. The future of Royal Mail is delivering parcels, it won't be delivering letters - so they need to focus on this a lot more. Internet sales are rocketing every year, yet Royal Mail report big losses and requires investment. It just doesn't add up, bearing in mind they're the biggest in the UK.

 

I wouldn't say it is poorly thought out. For the Signed For service it is just right, you don't care where it is, just that it has arrived, that it was signed by someone and who that someone was. For international mail they do a service that tracks process by process.

They do do parcels (hu huh huh, dodo). Remember ParcelForce was Royal Mail parcels until it got a rebrand.

 

As I mentioned in my first post, they may have reported losses but that was down to the government taking a hefty cut and from some interesting accounting practices. I wouldn't be surprised if come their first published accounts next year they make a spectacular profit.

Posted
Anyone manage to sell @£4.50 and make £270 overnight?

 

Yes. Hargreaves Lansdowne's website melted due to their inability to predict the entirely predictable rush of users wanting to use it. I sold late Fri afternoon at £4.52 - naturally they were worth more than that when I last looked but I never planned to hang on to them.

Posted
Another typical Tory Sell Off - sok though, we are all in this together according to Dave Country Support Cameron.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20925[/ATTACH]

 

:tinfoil3: Tin foil hat time? Investment firm makes money on investment and happens to know chancellor. :p Even though it was the Business minister that initiated the Privatisation? There is a lot to give Osbourne a kicking over so no need to make conspiracy theories up based on myths!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
:tinfoil3: Tin foil hat time? Investment firm makes money on investment and happens to know chancellor. :p Even though it was the Business minister that initiated the Privatisation? There is a lot to give Osbourne a kicking over so no need to make conspiracy theories up based on myths!

 

If that is what you believe then you go and believe that........ You obviously know nothing about the relation between Ruddock, Davies and Tory Toff George. Not only that the short selling Lansdowne Partners did against Northern Rock and who sits on their management committee. Sok though - you believe what you want to......

Posted
Another typical Tory Sell Off - sok though, we are all in this together according to Dave Country Supper Cameron.[ATTACH=CONFIG]20925[/ATTACH]

 

Lets not forget the repeated times that Mandelson tried to sell it for Labour though.

Posted
If that is what you believe then you go and believe that........ You obviously know nothing about the relation between Ruddock, Davies and Tory Toff George. Not only that the short selling Lansdowne Partners did against Northern Rock and who sits on their management committee. Sok though - you believe what you want to......

 

Saying go on and believe what you want to believe is a 2 way retort.

I don't doubt there are relations and I don't doubt things happen. That doesn't stop that image being very silly and Daily Mail worthy at best. As sickening as it is sometimes, an Investment company is there to invest and make money.

 

Not arguing about getting them out though.

 

(on a tangent "Sok" is that an acronym or "it's ok" contraction?)

Posted
Lets not forget the repeated times that Mandelson tried to sell it for Labour though.

 

Totally agree, and I didn't agree with it back then either.

Posted
Saying go on and believe what you want to believe is a 2 way retort.

I don't doubt there are relations and I don't doubt things happen. That doesn't stop that image being very silly and Daily Mail worthy at best. As sickening as it is sometimes, an Investment company is there to invest and make money.

 

Not arguing about getting them out though.

 

(on a tangent "Sok" is that an acronym or "it's ok" contraction?)

 

I would not know, I don't read the Daily Mail. You obviously do if you are comparing it..... ;-)

Posted
...

..

.

 

Well you sir are a poopy head :p

 

Well, you see that puddle over there, the one that the dog has just wee weed in - that is your swimming pool that is, that is where you go swimming.

Posted

You see that piece of old crust, with blue mould all over it, that's got a bit wet in the corner, that is very stale and hard, has been on the floor and it smells very bad because it is off.

 

That's your dinner that is, that's what you have at Christmas. That's your special birthday meal.

Posted
You see that piece of old crust, with blue mould all over it, that's got a bit wet in the corner, that is very stale and hard, has been on the floor and it smells very bad because it is off.

 

That's your dinner that is, that's what you have at Christmas. That's your special birthday meal.

 

You see those workman's tents in the middle of the street ? Thats your house that is. Thats where you go on holiday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...