Jump to content

Greenbeast

Members
  • Posts

    659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Greenbeast

  1. this is a good idea, would be worth getting two disks, make a pass with one disk and then another skim pass to make sure the entire cut is at full depth
  2. i'd be inclined to get a standard grinder (useful) and maybe mod it, add a depth stop to it somehow
  3. part for multiple projects; a sous vide cooker, a retro digital music player, etc... plus a new set of slim fit shirts to fit my new physique
  4. We're living in a time of dwindling resources, things will likely not improve.
  5. where is better?
  6. I'm in the middle of this right now, they spent 6 months trying to charge me for gas usage after the date that I moved out (which they confirmed every time I called), idiots
  7. I've just been through all the XFM shows and all the podcasts this august/September (for about the 4th time) cracking stuff
  8. amazing. the rocket and also the idea of using a hexacopter to capture it at altitude
  9. Can't see the point, just tip a cup of water into the kettle, this can be done with any kettle on the earth rather than a specific, expensive model.
  10. spot on
  11. Migrated exchange from 2003 to 2010 on a repurposed box during the summer. We’re having issues with exchange backing up and it looks like it might be due to storage problems. So I’m looking into it and have come across some ‘inconsistencies’ with the RAID array. Pretty sure I built the array as RAID 5, it seems the go-to option generally. The array consists of 4 x 147Gb 15k SCSI Drives. The RAID is reported as 420Gb in size, both in the configuration utility and in Windows, which seems right as the drives are in actuality 140Gb and 3 x 140 is 420 But the configuration utility tells me the array is RAID 0 and is not ‘REDUNDANT’ (as per RAID level 0) That doesn’t tally up with the logical disk size. One of the drives shows 3 media errors, so I intended installing a fifth drive (hot spare) and failing the dodgy drive. But when I did so the array went offline (which tallies with RAID 0) How can I be sure what I have? Can I add a fifth drive and move from RAID 0 to RAID 5 ‘live’ or do I need to recreate the array from scratch?
  12. classic stuff
  13. 30 oh dear :/
  14. ha ha quality
  15. ok interesting from all there, thanks. I checked the d/l speed of the torrents when troubleshooting and they were at the 4-10kbps level, so I couldn't understand it The access point i'm currently using is actually another wireless cable router as it's got better wireless capability than the WAP I replaced it with. And that change was only recent (month ago maybe). So that and the switches are definitely something to change out and check
  16. At my home (a farm) there are two main properties The first house has the phone line and main router (BT Home hub) but we have cat5 running underground to the second building (my place) which has a couple of 8 port switches, with my sheevaplug Linux torrent machine connected to one of them. I usually have torrents ticking away all the time. Recently my step-dad in the main house was having trouble with internet access being slow (PDFs take ages/don't complete, etc...) and experimented with disconnecting my cat5 connection at his end. The connection immediately improved. We've since tested this with me sitting in his house using a speed checker and pausing/resuming the torrent client. I don't notice any speed issues my end on my laptop/phone connected via wireless access point hanging off of one of the switches, whether the torrents are running or not. I would like to keep using torrents but can't really (during the day at least) if it practically disables my parents internet at their house. Any ideas why a few measly trickling torrents would cause network/internet slowing? especially as it doesn't seem to affect me? any tiups on improving the situation, that enables me to still use torrents?
  17. if you were talking to me, that is a very good question. I'm just riding it out until they realise it's a waste of my time
  18. I'm looking at a ICT suite full of students /miserable at being made to sit in on selected classes instead of doing my job as the sole IT technician in a Secondary school
  19. yes I figured fat would be the issue, my first thought was that surely they would be mincing the 'meat' like normal and can chuck in fat and seasoning like normal but then of course where does the fat come from
  20. it could almost be a person in a suit, amazing
  21. good luck, from another one man 'team' with a list as long as his arm
  22. quite! I can't see Bale being interested in this project
  23. This feels like it's gonna be rubbish. I saw Man of Steel, it was awful. Dark Knight Trilogy was awesome
  24. OMG Sous vide then proper chargrilled, awesome
  25. subtract 22 from the temperature at your location and multiply by 3.6
×
×
  • Create New...