Popular Post laserblazer Posted July 6, 2011 Popular Post Posted July 6, 2011 I tried phoning that Rebekah Brooks to tell her what I think. I couldn't get through, so I left her a message on my voicemail. 13
robmal Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 I tried phoning that Rebekah Brooks to tell her what I think. I couldn't get through, so I left her a message on my voicemail. That will be fine then, she's bound to get it!
plexer Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 Thing is though it's not phone hacking is it? they used the default voicemail pin codes or possibly guessed them no element of hacking in that at all. Yes I know that "we used the default voicemail pin to listen to messages" is not such a sensationalist headline. The whole situation is disgusting that's for sure. Ben
CAM Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 They know they shouldn't be using it so it makes no difference. It's like you leaving your EduGeek password as "123abc" and wondering why I've gone in, read your PMs and changed your location to "CHANGEMYPASSWORDLOL"
russdev Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) They know they shouldn't be using it so it makes no difference. It's like you leaving your EduGeek password as "123abc" and wondering why I've gone in, read your PMs and changed your location to "CHANGEMYPASSWORDLOL" I suppose as been said on one hand people can't get too bothered about celebrities having their phoned hacked. But people can sympathizer with parents of Milly Dowler who were not famous by choice but by need.. Russ Edited July 6, 2011 by russdev
LiamH Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 I wish they used the term Phreaking, That's what i always knew telecoms hacking as and its such a cool word. It wouldn't instill the panic and fear as much, since "hacking" is the new flavor of the month in the news.
Domino Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 Thing is though it's not phone hacking is it? they used the default voicemail pin codes or possibly guessed them no element of hacking in that at all. Yes I know that "we used the default voicemail pin to listen to messages" is not such a sensationalist headline. The whole situation is disgusting that's for sure. Ben Yeah, but it's still 'accessing a system you're not entitled to' (I forget the actual terminology) which is the name of the charge. Unfortunately the average Joe wouldn't understand the difference - so hacking it is. Like lulzsec DDoSing the CIA website apparently translates as "CIA hackZ0red!!1! OH NOES!!1"
CAM Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 I wish they used the term Phreaking, That's what i always knew telecoms hacking as and its such a cool word. It wouldn't instill the panic and fear as much, since "hacking" is the new flavor of the month in the news. Frankly, I'm surprised the Sun hasn't used the term Phacking.
Hightower Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 Surely it should be the 'big cracking scandel' instead of hacking. What is the difference between hacking and cracking http://www.geek.com/forums/topic/hacking-and-cracking
Arthur Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 Naked Security Blog - How phone hacking worked and how to make sure you're not a victim (via There was no “phone hacking” – but have you changed your voicemail codes?) A lot of mobile customers are bewildered by the events going on in the world press at the moment with all this talk of 'phone hacking'. Many of my friends have asked me what they can do to protect their phones and what the whole thing is about. The truth is, there is no actual phone hacking involved and it is also wrong to call what went on hacking. What's really being discussed is illicit access to voicemail messages. I’m going to explain a bit about what exactly is behind this, how it works and what you can do to protect yourself from people wanting to access your voicemails.
6Foot2 Posted July 8, 2011 Posted July 8, 2011 Relevant link: Murdoch executives, police and PCC: Phone hacking denials | Media | The Guardian Top quotes form the page: February 2007 Rupert Murdoch:"If you're talking about illegal tapping by a private investigator, that is not part of our culture anywhere in the world, least of all in Britain." July 2009 News International statement following publication of first Guardian hacking story by Nick Davies "All of these irresponsible and unsubstantiated allegations against News of the World and other News International titles and its journalists are false."
laserblazer Posted July 15, 2011 Author Posted July 15, 2011 (edited) The brother of an acquaintance of mine was arrested yesterday! He was a deputy editor for NOW Edited July 15, 2011 by laserblazer
6Foot2 Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Breaking News: Report: Chase Carey May Replace Rupert Murdoch as News Corp. CEO (Updated) | Reuters
SmellyLlama Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 They know they shouldn't be using it so it makes no difference. It's like you leaving your EduGeek password as "123abc" and wondering why I've gone in, read your PMs and changed your location to "CHANGEMYPASSWORDLOL" How did you get my password?!?!?!!!!!!!!!
ICT_GUY Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 I thought that technically its not hacking its Phreaking?
SteveBentley Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 A combination of social engineering (eg ringing up for a PIN reset impersonating the account holder) and logging in with default passwords, which isn't really hacking, cracking or phreaking.
fiza Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Strange how the phone hacking whistle blower "Sean Hoare" has been found dead. Unexplained but not suspicious according to the Police.
CHR1S Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Who actually leaves voice mail on the server? I certainly don't and my messages are absolute drivvle! If the so called "hackers" want to listen to "Chris, can you go to Class 3 and get their DVD to play" then let them,
6Foot2 Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 BBC News Live Feed: BBC News - Rebekah Brooks grilled by MPs [Currently 'in the chair' Rebekah Brooks]
jinnantonnixx Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Strange how the phone hacking whistle blower "Sean Hoare" has been found dead. Unexplained but not suspicious according to the Police. Full explanation here: Sean Hoare’s death very, very suspicious, insists everyone except the police
tech_guy Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Sean was bumped off. Wait for the Police to cotton on - might take some time though...... Perhaps someone should leave a message for them on their voicemail.....
Andrew_C Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 Of course he wasn't "silenced"; just like David Kelly wasn't.
PiqueABoo Posted July 19, 2011 Posted July 19, 2011 (edited) I've got a friend who works in PR for Herts. police, perhaps I should take them out to dinner? Note for The Guardian: That person actually has genuine Integrity[tm] same as other folk I'm content to associate with - the only thing I've ever heard about their job is that they'd had a busy week attempting to correct some erroneous claims in [my words:] a very silly story that went national during an apparently very slow news week. -- Both the select committees today were extremely boring and repetitive. I never imagined their were so many different questions which have the same answer from anyone you care to ask. Sorry folks but Douglas Adams clearly got it wrong, forget all about "42" it turns out that it's: "At that time I wasn't aware of...". Did Tom Watson, almost the only person asking any decent questions today, leave the even more torturous Rebekah session in frustration? Could have sworn I heard a "..waste of time.." and abracadabra, he wasn't there. Edited July 19, 2011 by PiqueABoo
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now