Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thought I'd post this here as I know this forum has a number of like-minded people with interests in science, rational thinking and of course, beer! :)

 

I'm currently organising a Skeptics in the Pub (Skeptics in the Pub) meeting for the 25th January 2011 7:00PM at:

 

The Mermaid

222 New Road

PO2 7RW

 

This is an off-shoot from the Hampshire Skeptics Society.

 

The pub have agreed to do some snacks too - trying to get an idea of numbers before we've had a meeting is near impossible! If you'd like to attend drop me a PM, reply on this thread, join our facebook group (Portsmouth Skeptics in the Pub ( Pompey SitP ) | Facebook) or Twitter feed @sitpportsmouth

 

I'd urge anyone interested in attending or speaking to get involved - we are talking to some very interesting people at the moment!

Posted

I can see that's going to be a bundle of fun:

 

'Mmm, this beer tastes really nice'

'There is no empirical evidence for that, so your talking rubbish'

 

Ever the skeptic:p

Posted
I can see that's going to be a bundle of fun:

 

'Mmm, this beer tastes really nice'

'There is no empirical evidence for that, so your talking rubbish'

 

Ever the skeptic:p

 

How is there no empirical evidence for beer tasting nice? I have loads!

 

You're talking rubbish!

Posted
Point proven lol.

 

I think you need to conduct your own research or wait for mine to be published and peer reviewed. I keep getting distracted or I fall over...

  • Thanks 1
Posted
I'll start formulating the peer review straight away.

 

Did I mention there's a skeptical meet up in a place that provides plenty of alcohol? :p

Posted
I am naturally sceptical about any group that uses an American spelling...suggest the involvement of foreign government agencies perhaps? :)
Posted
I am naturally sceptical about any group that uses an American spelling...suggest the involvement of foreign government agencies perhaps? :)

 

Causes much debate in the UK communities but I go with the 'k' as I think it is more commonly used.

Posted

From the OED:

Pronunciation: /ˈskɛptɪk/

Etymology: < French sceptique adj. and n., or its source late Latin scepticus (Scepticī n. plural, the Sceptics), lit. inquiring, reflective, assumed by the disciples of Pyrrho as their distinctive epithet; < σκεπ- in σκέπτεσθαι to look out, consider, ablaut-var. of σκοπ- in σκοπεῖν to look, σκοπός watchman, mark to aim at, etc.: see scope n.2 Compare Spanish escéptico, Portuguese sceptico, Italian scettico, German skeptiker n., skeptisch adj.

In French the sc is pronounced /s/ as in sceptre. In English direct recourse to Greek produced the pronunciation with /sk/ . The spelling with sk-, for which compare skeleton n., occurs in the earliest instance, and has been used occas. by later writers. It is adopted without comment or alternative in Johnson's Dictionary, but did not become general in England; in the U.S. it is the ordinary form. Now usually spelt sceptic in the U.K. and British Commonwealth and skeptic in the U.S. Similarly all the derivatives, scepticism/skepticism, etc.

 

BTW Is anyone interested in joining my new group... Pedants in the Public House ;)

Posted
From the OED:

 

 

BTW Is anyone interested in joining my new group... Pedants in the Public House ;)

 

Well I'm in :) I mean that it's more commonly used by us skeptics - like 'Skeptics in the Pub' and 'Drinking Skeptically' which is international.

 

Ohh... Is there now?

 

Do they meet in pubs?

 

hehe...

 

Winchester Skeptics in the Pub

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...