russdev Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgbNymZ7vqY]YouTube- The Muppets: Bohemian Rhapsody[/ame] I know it won't be it would be good if Muppets could beat the X-Factor.. 3
maniac Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Problem is there's 750,000 RATM fans well ahead of you. http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/group.php?gid=2228594104&ref=mf Still, there's always the number 2 slot to aim for
Devontechie Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 (edited) Yes there is a lot of people that have said that they want RATM to be number 1 but how many will buy it? Would be good to see the Muppets at number 1.. Edited December 14, 2009 by Devontechie Spelling!
maniac Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Yes there is a lot of people that have said that they want RATM to be number 1 but how many will buy it? Would be good to see the Muppets at number 1.. True, RATM number 2 in the I-tunes download chart thou, muppets are number 45 so I brought both
AngryTechnician Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Yes there is a lot of people that have said that they want RATM to be number 1 but how many will buy it? I did. Hell, the download is only 29p on Amazon and it counts towards the chart placement.
Hightower Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 I did. Hell, the download is only 29p on Amazon and it counts towards the chart placement. Apparantly downloads bought for less than 40p don't count. Just what I heard on the grapevine.
JJonas Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 (edited) Apparantly downloads bought for less than 40p don't count. Just what I heard on the grapevine. Heres a 79p one then [ame=http://www.amazon.co.uk/Killing-In-The-Name/dp/B001I5GQYU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=dmusic&qid=1260865881&sr=8-2]Killing In The Name: Rage Against The Machine: Amazon.co.uk: MP3 Downloads[/ame] and the Muppets at 79p [ame=http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bohemian-Rhapsody/dp/B0030FJL5W/ref=sr_1_67?ie=UTF8&s=dmusic&qid=1260866033&sr=1-67]Bohemian Rhapsody: Queen And The Muppets: Amazon.co.uk: MP3 Downloads[/ame] Edited December 15, 2009 by JJonas
BandyQuill Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 im buying a couple of copies... so long as its not xFactor i dont care whats there XD
AyatollahPies Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 I wouldn't be surprised if 'The Cowell' had his fingers in RATMs' record company too.
GrumbleDook Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 It's not that people want RATM at number one ... they just don't want an X Factor artist ... but remember that this is playing with the life and career of Joe (I preferred Olly actually ... and still prefer Jamie over all). If people were smart about it then the campaign should not be about stopping the single from being number one by outselling it as it will still sell as many singles, but stopping it from staying there. Xmas number one is nothing important other than a branding ... And so many different songs have been raised as 'the song to stop the X-Factor number one' that it is almost a waste of time. Get behind the Togmeister I say ... Silver Bells for number one (and do a bit of good for charity too!)
Edu-IT Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Why is it that people don't want the X Factor single to be number 1? How will it affect their day to day work? In some way, they'll still be lining the pockets of Simon, Syco, Sony and whatever other pies he has his fingers in so I wish people would just get over it and stop with all the Tweets, posts, emails, Facebook entries etc about RATM. For the record X Factor single is in at No1 in the iTunes chart this morning. Apple - iTunes - iTunes Store - Charts - Top 10 Songs
sidewinder Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 but remember that this is playing with the life and career of Joe Oh boo-hoo. Sorry but why has he got a divine right to a number 1 with a shoddy hastily written single, presumably with the usual cheesy video? If the music that came out of that show wasnt so turgid and bland people wouldnt get so annoyed about it. It doesnt matter who it is, even to Simon Cowell, its just a cash cow every single bloody year, with the show timed perfectly to finish in time for a Christmas #1 because morons buy whatever comes out of it Im not going to buy the RATM single, Im not that bothered, but it is good to see there are some people left who arnt sucked into the constant (it literally is year round now) talent show hype 3
maniac Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Why is it that people don't want the X Factor single to be number 1? How will it affect their day to day work? In some way, they'll still be lining the pockets of Simon, Syco, Sony and whatever other pies he has his fingers in so I wish people would just get over it and stop with all the Tweets, posts, emails, Facebook entries etc about RATM. [/url] I think it's that little bit inside us all that gets fed up with the same old predictable c**p every year, and it's a brillient example of the 'power' of social networking sites - I don't think anyone really cares where the profits from the sales go. There is also a just giving page linked to the facebook group setup to donate to the shelter charity which has raised £27,000 so far, so some good can come out of it whether or not they make it to number 1. Tracy Morter is fundraising for Shelter - JustGiving Mike.
Arcath Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 What it comes down to is id rather not have some guy singing a bad cover of a song being number 1 at christmas and getting the extra publicity from that, just because he won some annoying tv talent show
Edu-IT Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Look at it like this. As GrumbleDook pointed out this is his career now, he's been given a chance that he may not have otherwise had. From what I have seen and read in the papers he seems a pretty ordinary young person. Why shouldn't he have the chance to be successful? Just because X Factor was his platform, and probably the only platform he would have got into the music industry, it doesn't really affect his voice or talent. If he didn't win through X Factor would people still be doing all this silly campaigning? I doubt it. I think the real gripe here is with Simon and not Joe, Olly, or whoever else could have won for that matter.
sidewinder Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 I think the real gripe here is with Simon and not Joe, Olly, or whoever else could have won for that matter. Of course it is. Thats the thing, it doesnt matter to anyone, including Simon Cowell, who wins because its a guaranteed #1 for very little effort. Whoever wins releases the same bloody song anyway. Its not his career, its one, very blatent money grabbing single. If he wants to go and produce a decent album next year, good luck to him, people just get annoyed with the generic single that gets released. As for it being his only chance, does that not point to him not being good enough? Loads of bands and artists do it themselves and get themselves deals, a lot more hard work required than going on a tv talent show. If he was that great would he not have been picked up by a label already? Perhaps thats why the number of winners of the show that have any longevity is so few
Hightower Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 We watched "move like MJ" on BBC3 last night. That was much better than the X-Factor.
Edu-IT Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Of course it is. Thats the thing, it doesnt matter to anyone, including Simon Cowell, who wins because its a guaranteed #1 for very little effort. Whoever wins releases the same bloody song anyway. Its not his career, its one, very blatent money grabbing single. If he wants to go and produce a decent album next year, good luck to him, people just get annoyed with the generic single that gets released. As for it being his only chance, does that not point to him not being good enough? Loads of bands and artists do it themselves and get themselves deals, a lot more hard work required than going on a tv talent show. If he was that great would he not have been picked up by a label already? Perhaps thats why the number of winners of the show that have any longevity is so few We all know Simon is rolling it in, nothing is going to change that. Good luck to him I say. I'd do the same if I could. With regards to his only chance, not at all. I imagine he probably could have done it himself if he really wanted to but 200,000 other people also tried to do it this way, so why not? There's just over a week until Christmas. Not enough time to write an song, let alone album that's going to blow everyone off their feet for Christmas. Thus they just rerecord a song. I imagine that's why.
Edu-IT Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Because he's nothing more than a karaoke singer? Because he will fade into nothingness in a matter of months? Because he won't write his own songs? Because he's a "pretty boy"? He'll just end up in the same place as David Sneddon, Steve Bookstein, Shayne Ward, Leon Jackson and all the others. I hope that he doesn't succeed, then it will send a message to plastic pop manufacturers that we're sick of the whole farce. If any of them were any good, then they'd use the show as nothing more than a launch point, and not blub when they didn't get anywhere as soon as they're out of the limelight. I think I must be going to the wrong karaoke's. Where do you go? I'm interested in coming. Even the most successfull artists sometimes don't write the songs themselves. Pretty boy? Not sure what you mean. Or he could end up in the same place as Alexandra? JLS? All from X Factor. Hope he doesn't succeed? I'm not going there. Why would you not want somebody you don't know to succeed? It's like me saying I hope you don't succeed in your job. I just wouldn't do it. Who has blubbed?
tommej Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 I couldn't really care less if people pay sony for ratm or pay sony for the xfactor pop-by-numbers winner. It's all noise at 7am on the way to work! The guy who started the ratm thing was on the radio the other day and he sounded pretty normal, genuinely suprised at the response. I was expecting some idiot student trying to stick it to the man!
zag Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 Why does RATM not show on the itunes chart then? Conspiracy?
JJonas Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 BBC News - Rock anthem outselling X Factor winner Joe McElderry
K.C.Leblanc Posted December 15, 2009 Posted December 15, 2009 (edited) POP TRIVIA MOMENT. If the Muppets make Crimbo number 1 Behemian Rhapsody will become the second song to have seen Christmas number 1 three times. So edugeeks, what's the only song to be UK christmas number 1 three times? EDIT: Hint this song was the first to do the double. Edited December 15, 2009 by K.C.Leblanc
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now