Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Morning all

I'm after an exchange expert as we're in the process of moving from 2003 to 2007 and there's lots of things that keep breaking. My gut feeling is to wipe the 2007 install and start a fresh but I want to talk to some one before I do.

 

Thanks guys

Posted

Are you doing an in place upgrade or a parallel one?

 

I had a few problems with mail delivery over 2 servers when I did this.

Posted

Hi guys just to confirm a few things

 

These are the instructions i followed

Transitioning from Exchange 2000/2003 to Exchange Server 2007 Part 1

Transitioning from Exchange 2000/2003 to Exchange Server 2007 Part 2

Transitioning from Exchange 2000/2003 to Exchange Server 2007 Part 3

 

1. We have 2 exchange servers 2003 & 2007, so we are doing this in parallel

2. I have four issues which i'm concerned about

a. Outgoing email is now starting to build in the 2003 queue

b. The Outlook Anywhere doesn't work as the settings have not gone across and i don't know why

c. When opening the management console on 2007 it tells me that i need to turn off the compression for the 3 default exchange sites using the IIS manager. The problem is when i do this it then tells me that the relevant back office file is missing.

d. My test mail account on 2007 can not send email

 

Hope this helps

Posted

Yes I had the same problems with delivery mail, I seem to remember the exchange testing tool was very useful in diagnosing problems with mail flow.

 

In the end I just kept my 2003 server going though, it doesn't seem any different.

Posted (edited)

We had an issue when moving our exchange 2007 system onto R2, problems with routing mail. we spend hours checking ports/firewals etc.

 

we discovered(sorry i cant find the link again) that 2007 isnt supported on R2, you either need to upgrade exchange to 2010 or migrate to a windows server 2008 box

 

hope this helps

 

Dan

Edited by DanSpeed
Posted

Moving From Exchange 2003 to 2007 can be a fairly easy process. We have done this several times. We have also moved from 2003 to 2010 and 2007 to 2010.

We are George Spencer School and also run Advanced IT Services. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding your move. [email protected]

 

P.s. I would recommend going straight to 2010

Posted
thanks for all the help guys, but i even had an exchange expert in and he couldn't figure what went wrong. :confused:

so we're rolling back to 2003

 

Noooo... exchange 2007 is far far far better... coudl you tell me in a bit more detail the problem so i can have a think...

 

or even where is your school?

Posted
Maybe some screenshots would do good, too? I don't see the logic about pernamently moving back to 2k3. Tried a clean exch 2007 install on a clean 2k8 (not R2!!) install? Is it virtualised? we have a virtualised setup here and it's fine, but I have heard it run into problems on vm's.
Posted
Maybe some screenshots would do good, too? I don't see the logic about pernamently moving back to 2k3. Tried a clean exch 2007 install on a clean 2k8 (not R2!!) install? Is it virtualised? we have a virtualised setup here and it's fine, but I have heard it run into problems on vm's.

 

The only time i have ever hit problmes is if a 2003 machine has been taken off without actually removing it. Even then it isnt that hard to clean it up manually.

Posted
I have a new server for my email, my current server is EX2003 with a single core 3gig Xeon with 2gb ram and it's really struggling now. I have purchased a new server with 2 2.33 Quad Core Xeons and 8 GB ram and was going to put 2007 on it and transition over but now I am thinking I might as well just make the move to 2010.
Posted
im affraid there is no inline upgrade option, you have to migrate the mailboxes to another server

 

To clarify, you have to build a new server and move the mailboxes. You cannot do an in-place upgrade, but 2010 will co-exist with SP2 perfectly fine.

 

However one thing to note. You really need a 2008 domain controller (2003 still works) just 2008 is more efficient and outlook connectivity is vastly improved.

Posted (edited)
I have a new server for my email, my current server is EX2003 with a single core 3gig Xeon with 2gb ram and it's really struggling now. I have purchased a new server with 2 2.33 Quad Core Xeons and 8 GB ram and was going to put 2007 on it and transition over but now I am thinking I might as well just make the move to 2010.

 

A move straight to 2010 would be advisable. however i would vastly increae the ammonth of ram required.

 

Exchange 2010 server role

 

Multiple roles (combinations of Hub Transport, Client Access, and Mailbox server roles)

10 GB

10 GB plus 3-30MB per mailbox (4 core server)

 

14 GB plus 3-30MB per mailbox (8 core server)

 

I would also seriously inspect hard drive configuration and mail database setup.

Edited by AIT
Posted

However one thing to note. You really need a 2008 domain controller (2003 still works) just 2008 is more efficient and outlook connectivity is vastly improved.

 

A move straight to 2010 would be advisable. however i would vastly increae the ammonth of ram required.

 

Exchange 2010 server role

 

Multiple roles (combinations of Hub Transport, Client Access, and Mailbox server roles)

10 GB

10 GB plus 3-30MB per mailbox (4 core server)

 

14 GB plus 3-30MB per mailbox (8 core server)

 

I would also seriously inspect hard drive configuration and mail database setup.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I plan to upgrade all my servers to 2008 over the course of next year, from what I understand you can do a straight upgrade from Server 2003 to 2008.

 

Thanks for the advice I will certainly take it onboard.

Posted
I plan to upgrade all my servers to 2008 over the course of next year, from what I understand you can do a straight upgrade from Server 2003 to 2008.

 

Thanks for the advice I will certainly take it onboard.

 

You can do an inline upgrade from 2003 to 2008. (im not really a fan of doing this)

And I certainly wouldn’t try it for DC's.

Posted
You can do an inline upgrade from 2003 to 2008. (im not really a fan of doing this)

And I certainly wouldn’t try it for DC's.

 

 

I thought in order to have a 2008 Domain controller you have to upgrade all cuurent 2003 DC's to 2008. I am sure that when I went to install a new DC using 2008 it said that I could not do it until all current DC's were 2008, I am probably wrong in that but I am sure that's what it said. Anyway I seem to have partly hijacked this thread sorry.

Posted
I thought in order to have a 2008 Domain controller you have to upgrade all cuurent 2003 DC's to 2008. I am sure that when I went to install a new DC using 2008 it said that I could not do it until all current DC's were 2008, I am probably wrong in that but I am sure that's what it said. Anyway I seem to have partly hijacked this thread sorry.

 

If that were the case how could you install the first 2008 domain controller?

 

You would have to install 2008 server add it to the domain as a domain controller this would involve upgrading the forest and upgrading domain. Domain prep tools.

 

once that one is installed you can gradually go round replacing the remaining dc's.

 

However once one is installed it will automatically upgrade the adm files to admx.

 

Hope this helps

Phil

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...