Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

LOL, I still think hes a buffoon tho! :p

 

Anyone else think its a large coincidence that the woman was a film maker/ journo / activist... PR stunt anyone?

Posted
I like Boris, he's human - blatantly so. Its nice to have someone in power who isn't worried about making an arse of himself.

 

Spot on. He makes cockups like evreyone else and he admits to them, most politicians don't. Like he said on Top Gear, people expect him to be a blithering idiot but he's actually quite competant.

 

Thumbs up for Boris.

Posted
Spot on. He makes cockups like evreyone else and he admits to them, most politicians don't. Like he said on Top Gear, people expect him to be a blithering idiot but he's actually quite competant.

 

Thumbs up for Boris.

 

So all we need now is to get him and whoever else to realise London isnt the centre of the universe and there is a whole country after its borders and we will be getting somewhere!

 

( I couldnt seem to find the smiley for opening a can of worms - can I request it plz? :p)

Guest theeldergeek
Posted
So all we need now is to get him and whoever else to realise London isnt the centre of the universe and there is a whole country after its borders and we will be getting somewhere!

 

I think the clue as to why Boris's interests lay mainly with London alone might be in his job title somewhere...

 

;)

Guest theeldergeek
Posted
Well duuur lol!! But it has to start somewhere!

 

It does start somewhere - parish/local council > county council > central government.

 

Why would you want the Mayor of London to get involved in the affairs of Dudley, for example?

 

What prompts you to make the claim that nothing is recognised beyond the 'borders' [sic] of London?

Posted
It does start somewhere - parish/local council > county council > central government.

 

Why would you want the Mayor of London to get involved in the affairs of Dudley, for example?

 

What prompts you to make the claim that nothing is recognised beyond the 'borders' [sic] of London?

 

Its not about getting involved in others affairs, its about being realistic with things like national stadiums (first thing I can think of from the top of my head that I know enough information about)

 

Why was the new Wembly built on the old site, in one of the most hard to get to places? Ok im probably biased but the Midlands is in the middle of the country, why not build it there in the middle where its easiest to get to and cheaper to build?

 

Did you know Birmingham hosted the World Half Marathon just a few weeks ago? I didnt see anything in the national press, did you? Was it covered in on TV?

 

There were other things that I picked up on too but I cant remember them right now, and yes its a jealousy thing too, I wish Birmingham had some of the things London gets and im sure others would too?

 

Anyway, I dont want this to turn into a my City is better than yours debate, its just my feelings that not just Birmingham but other big cities are overlooked just to make London look better.

 

:feedtroll: ;)

Posted
Its not about getting involved in others affairs, its about being realistic with things like national stadiums (first thing I can think of from the top of my head that I know enough information about)

 

Why was the new Wembly built on the old site, in one of the most hard to get to places? Ok im probably biased but the Midlands is in the middle of the country, why not build it there in the middle where its easiest to get to and cheaper to build?

 

The Midlands is not in the middle population-wise. It may be geographically so, but if countries did that - we'd have things being built in the Australian outback, the sahara desert, in the middle of Canadian forests etc... Economically, London is the most sensible place to put national buildings.

Posted
The Midlands is not in the middle population-wise. It may be geographically so, but if countries did that - we'd have things being built in the Australian outback, the sahara desert, in the middle of Canadian forests etc... Economically, London is the most sensible place to put national buildings.

 

But why not in a more easily accessable place, with a major motorway/rail link on the outskirts?

 

I did some quick maths and your right the London area still has more population than the larger cities of England combined so a very valid point! Perhaps my pride for my hometown is more of a part than common sense ;) hehe

Posted
But why not in a more easily accessable place, with a major motorway/rail link on the outskirts?

 

I did some quick maths and your right the London area still has more population than the larger cities of England combined so a very valid point! Perhaps my pride for my hometown is more of a part than common sense ;) hehe

 

More accessible? You mean in a location which has an efficient underground rail system, will soon have crossrail, has several international and international airports within a short distance, has a motorway connection 2 miles away (M11, which connects to the M25 in a short distance also)?

 

Seems like a pretty ideal site to me! :p

Posted
More accessible? You mean in a location which has an efficient underground rail system, will soon have crossrail, has several international and international airports within a short distance, has a motorway connection 2 miles away (M11, which connects to the M25 in a short distance also)?

 

Seems like a pretty ideal site to me! :p

 

I am proven wrong... ill get my coat!! ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...