Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

sky arent allowed to own all of the english games any more.

 

They will go elsewhere. Theres been a lot written about it in the scottish press..

 

Its Scottish football it will affect the most.

 

About 4 of the SPL clubs rely on the income from Setanta as 20% of their income. The money in Scottish football pales into insignificance compared to the money in England.

 

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2511851.0.setanta_defaults_on_3m_payment_to_spl.php

 

http://www.theherald.co.uk/sport/headlines/display.var.2513419.0.expert_barnett_warns_of_consequences_of_demise_of_setanta.php

Posted

Sky apparently can bid for sentantas rights not sure of ins and outs.

 

Apparently epsn have wanted to move their channel away Sentanta for a while but locked into a contract.

 

Russ

Posted

Sky aren't allowed to own all packages, which I think is silly so long as there's good competition in the bidding process. It's probably costing viewers more money to have Setanta and Sky now, so I don't see what being anti-competitive has to do with anything! Customers were getting a better deal in the first place.

 

I believe Setanta owe the taxman quite a lot, and not just the Premier League. A lot of other companies could have financial problems as a result (if they're owed money too). It's not looking bright for Setanta. I was surprised also when a £20M bid for 51% was put forward to Setanta. Seems quite a small amount bearing in mind they owe at least £35M.

Posted

No sky are not allowed to own all the packages but they are allowed to bid for one of two packages that setanta did own which means they will have most of games.

 

Russ

Posted
Yes one of the two on offer you're right. And knowing Sky they probably will buy the better of the two. Question remains however, other than EPSN who else would bid for the remaining package? They could offer a stupid amount and no one could do anything (even Sky).
Posted

According to linkedin has 500 staff of course I don't want staff to lose jobs that is obviously but on personnel level can see closure of the company being beneficial to lot of the customers.

 

Russ

Posted
According to linkedin has 500 staff of course I don't want staff to lose jobs that is obviously but on personnel level can see closure of the company being beneficial to lot of the customers.

 

Russ

 

on a personnel level ? they won't have any personnel if they go bust you loon.

 

Or did you mean personal level, in which case yeah i'm sure the setanta customers your speaking on behalf of would love to see the service cut or alternatively to see only part of what they currently pay for to be bought up by setanta's UK competitors. Setanta broadcast much more besides premier$h1t football and spl you know. I don't know how seamless a transition it would be for competitors to buy out these packages if acceptable to the sporting orgs selling them.

Posted
bbc should come in for the remaining package of 21 games or whatever it is.

 

Hopefully ESPN will go for the Scottish package,

Spl Consider Substantial Espn Offer (from The Herald )

 

i thought they'd spunked all their [sorry, our] money on F1. Plus don't they already pay a fair wedge for MOTD highlights. Doesn't look good if they can pull out the stops to buy 21 premier league games AND premier league highlights but not a single ball of international cricket.

 

not that i think they could/would buy those live games.

Posted
on a personnel level ? they won't have any personnel if they go bust you loon.

 

Or did you mean personal level, in which case yeah i'm sure the setanta customers your speaking on behalf of would love to see the service cut or alternatively to see only part of what they currently pay for to be bought up by setanta's UK competitors. Setanta broadcast much more besides premier$h1t football and spl you know. I don't know how seamless a transition it would be for competitors to buy out these packages if acceptable to the sporting orgs selling them.

 

I did mean personal :)

 

Also I don't care about the football...

 

Most sentanta customers I would like to make educated guess have sky sports. Sentanta going bust would release a large amount of sports rights (not just football) that would get picked up by not just Sky but Eurosport, BBC & ITV. Which means that they would better off as they would be seeing the sports still but paying less..

 

Only situation where would not be beneficial would be for a customer does not have Sky but has Setanta but as said think that would be a very low %.

 

Russ

 

 

 

Russ

Posted
We can't get ESPN in the UK right? So, how would we watch these games? Or would they be shown on the ESPN America Channel on Virgin Media?

 

This is where it gets very interesting if espn got a set of rights...

 

Option one - Setanta goees bust

 

ESPN America goes to a Sky package - and if they have football rights suspect would be renamed just to espn.

 

Option two - Setanta carrys on

 

ESPN would again I suspect be renamed to espn but then would remain on Setanta and you would need to pay Setanta to access the channel and so access the football. Then as soon as contract up with Setanta then espn would move over to a sky package.

 

Option 3 - Rent

 

They rent space on another channel but not sure the legal side of that.

 

 

Russ

Posted

Frankly the Euro anti-monopoly legislation which prevents Sky from obtaining all the packages is loony in this one, stand alone case.

 

Sky wouldn't put up the monthly subscription for Sports if they got all the packages.

 

They wouldn't run another season of "Premiership Plus", as the take up was very low.

 

In this instance it is actually better for the consumer for one company to take the monopoly, and save them £10 for another premium service, of which they'd only watch the football!

Posted

nothing in the news here regarding setanta australia

 

Home AUS | Setanta

 

When I was here last, it was ESPN that showed all the scottish games..

 

Im sure i wont miss many games now with my slingboxes strategically placed in 3 countries, as long as i can find the bandwidth

Posted
They have gone into administration. Check out the message on their site. I still feel sorry for people losing their jobs, even though I agree with comments above that having two companies showing the football actually costs more than if it were just Sky.
Posted

When i called setanta to see if i could subscribe for a month they wanted £27 for the first month and then £12.95 or similar for the following months. So it would have cost me £40 for the month to watch 1 game. Setanta didnt have enough good games on and having paid stupid money for sky sports and movies i dont see the point in paying extra for more sport.

 

Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...