6Foot2 Posted August 8, 2017 Author Posted August 8, 2017 Link: Fire Test Report DCLG BS 8414 Test No. 3 [Presentation: 51 page PDF] 1
LeMarchand Posted January 18, 2018 Posted January 18, 2018 At least one freeholder is making good on the same sort of cladding used @ Grenfell - and passing on the costs to the leaseholders to the tune of >£31k each!: Grenfell Tower: Residents of private block of flats handed £2m bill to replace 'flammable' cladding | The Independent Plus (one presumes) higher service charges to fund a full-time fire marshall, which will apparently cost £300,000/year.
mikeprice Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 OK - bumping an old thread but given the news today.... So the inquiry says CLEARLY that the cladding contravened the building regulations doesn't this mean that this now becomes a case of - at least morally - murder maybe legally it can only be something else - corporate manslaughter or something but at this point it surely should become a police matter maybe it needs to wait for the conclusions of the next part of the inquiry - but this is the first authoritative entity that has declared that regulation were ignored hence the deaths were no accident but were directly caused by the actions of others 1
Garacesh Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 I would have thought it would be Gross Negligence Manslaughter, however: The offence of gross negligence manslaughter (GNM) is committed where the death is a result of a grossly negligent (though otherwise lawful) act or omission on the part of the defendant If the cladding was decidedly not up to code, I suspect it's not 'otherwise lawful'
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now