JATSO Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Hi All, I look after 4 Primary Schools all out curriculum servers are up for refresh later this year, so what should I be looking for. Our current servers are Servers, Win 2008 4 GB Ram 1.5TB of disc space setup using Raid 5 with each school having about 100 clients on the domain and about 20 - 30 users that access shares on the servers, we will need more storage as we are running at about 75% of the current capacity. We use Tandberg RDX and Cartridges for backup. Our MIS is going to be moved online so not worried about that. Not so much interested in who supplies them at present but more what base spec should I look for any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
mavhc Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 isn't the point of servers that they're easy to upgrade? add 20GB more ram and some new drives, and maybe a second cpu?
JATSO Posted January 25, 2016 Author Posted January 25, 2016 isn't the point of servers that they're easy to upgrade? add 20GB more ram and some new drives, and maybe a second cpu? Thanks I will look at that as an option as well.
ICTDirect_Dave Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 RAM and CPU upgrade would certainly be the most cost-effective way of doing an upgrade. What model are your current servers?
JATSO Posted January 25, 2016 Author Posted January 25, 2016 They are Tower builds by Stone Computers. The MotherBoard is an: Intel Corporation S3420GP E51976-406
CHR1S Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Id argue a RAM upgrade and a tidy up is all that's needed. I am a tight so and so tho 1
PotNoodleTech Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Get refurbed servers from somewhere like ICT Direct or Serversource. That way you can get a server at a decent price, with whatever disk configuration you need to futureproof. e.g if you currently have 6 x 3.5" drives in your old server you could get a new server with 24 x 2.5" drives and only fill the server half full of drives - this gives massive scope for future expansion. 2
ICTDirect_Dave Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Socket 1156 eh? What processor is in it?
JATSO Posted January 25, 2016 Author Posted January 25, 2016 Socket 1156 eh? What processor is in it? Intel 2.93 gigahertz Intel Xeon 64 kilobyte primary memory cache 256 kilobyte secondary memory cache 8192 kilobyte tertiary memory cache 64-bit ready
CHR1S Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 If you dont virtualise anything or run TS a single processor will be fine. I run an Xeon E5-2609 as a single CPU and it takes a battering, VM's etc and even now my RAM is the bottleneck.
Michael Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Are you running a 32Bit or 64Bit instance of 2008 Server (Windows Vista equivalent), not to be confused with 2008 R2 which is 64Bit only (Windows 7 equivalent)? If running 32Bit, installing 20GB of memory will offer you no benefit 1
JATSO Posted January 25, 2016 Author Posted January 25, 2016 Were running 32bit but looking to move to Server 2012 if possible.
Michael Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 Were running 32bit but looking to move to Server 2012 if possible. That's absolutely fine, but there's no direct upgrade path. You'll need to transfer all FSMO roles, wipe the local volume and install 2012 R2 as new, then re-promote it to the domain and transfer roles back. Alternatively (this is another consideration), Windows Server 2016 probably isn't too far away now. The reason I mention this, is because Microsoft haven't really spoken about whether Windows Server 2016 (like Windows 10), will it be the last server OS, or will there still be new additions?
ICTDirect_Dave Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 So the Xeon is decent: PassMark - Intel Xeon X3470 @ 2.93GHz - Price performance comparison. It can take up to 32GB RAM so that might be the way to go 1
CHR1S Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 So the Xeon is decent: PassMark - Intel Xeon X3470 @ 2.93GHz - Price performance comparison. It can take up to 32GB RAM so that might be the way to go Two years older then the one in my server and still more powerful, proves you dont always need to upgrade.
LukeC Posted January 25, 2016 Posted January 25, 2016 As people are suggesting upgrade you want to ask yourself will it be realible in the future? Can you afford downtime? Will the money be there in the future if not replaced now. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now