Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
So if you don't like Win 8 it's because you're too lazy or too ignorant to get used to it? Some thoughtful, insightful responses worthy of genuine consideration...

 

If that's all you want to take from it, then so be it. However, for some people, that is the case. There are compelling arguments both for and against, but some people seem to just jump on the negativity bandwagon, instead of formulating their own opinions.

 

I have experienced people buying new hardware and being told to take it back because its running windows 8, even though they haven't used the OS themselves... grinds my gears.

 

Windows 8 has alot to offer, and it should only improve upon that in time.

Edited by cogrady84
Posted
If that's all you want to take from it, then so be it. However, for some people, that is the case. There are compelling arguments both for and against, but some people seem to just jump on the negativity bandwagon, instead of formulating their own opinions.

 

Windows 8 has alot to offer, and it should only improve upon that in time.

 

But that does sound just a little like '...instead of formulating the same opinion I have.'

Posted
But that does sound just a little like '...instead of formulating the same opinion I have.'

 

You say that like i'm the only person in this thread who likes windows 8? -_-

Posted

I remember the same arguments that Vista was the most amazing thing since sliced bread :)

 

History will not record Windows 8 kindly.

 

I have no doubt Microsoft will fix it with version 9 though, at the very least they should learn that not everyone uses Frankenstein touch computers quite yet ;)

Posted (edited)
Get a grip. I've got windows 8 across my school. Kids love it, teachers love it. Not had any issues with it.

 

How it is it an awful release?? Its Windows 7 with Metro screen across the front of it.

 

The issue with people and Windows 8 is the fact you have to do something different to press start. Pathetic really.

 

I've got to agree with Robjduk.

 

And thats the point - its Windows 7 with a crappy unwanted interface stuck on it - so why bother at all!

 

I by no means an Apple fan but at least OSX is incremented without dicking about with the interface.

Edited by Sheridan
Posted
I just noticed today that in Win 8, Microsoft have removed 'Manage Wireless Profiles' which was extremely useful in Win 7. Why on earth have they removed this?
Guest Guest
Posted
And thats the point - its Windows 7 with a crappy unwanted interface stuck on it - so why bother at all!

 

And windows 7 is Vista with slight interface changes, and we all know how popular Vista was and how much everyone loves 7.*

 

 

My bets are that Windows 9 will be no different interface wise, just a bit of tweaking, but as with Vista>7, by that point everyone "will have gotten used to it" and it will be hailed as the new "XP/7".

 

 

*Of course neither yours or my statement are accurate as there is far more to it than just interface changes.

Posted

I am by no means a luddite, and have been using W8 at home since launch.

 

However (you just knew there had to be one didn't you) I think TIFKAM is a crap interface. Some of the many small irritants I could list include taking almost four clicks to shut down, and if I type 'firewall' into the search it brings nothing back meaning I have to go through Control Panel.

 

They are only small irritants, but W8 contains a lot of them IMHO. I wouldn't dream of foisting it on my users in it's current state.

Posted
I type 'firewall' into the search it brings nothing back meaning I have to go through Control Panel.

 

If you look on the right side of the search screen and select "settings", it'll bring back the Windows Firewall (and anything else you might wish to search for in Control Panel)!

Posted
If you look on the right side of the search screen and select "settings", it'll bring back the Windows Firewall (and anything else you might wish to search for in Control Panel)!

 

And yet if I type 'firewall' into W7 up it pops! Somewhat counter-intuitive in my eyes.

Posted

Vista and W7 were incremental updates of Xp/2000 - same principles (start menu etc), different look. W8 is W7 with bad things done to it.

 

I'm not against change - but either MS should have had the confidence to provide whole new UI (metro or whatever) or enchance the existing one (like osx) rather than bodge the two together.

Posted
And yet if I type 'firewall' into W7 up it pops! Somewhat counter-intuitive in my eyes.

 

and if you type it into the start screen it pops up just fine. Pin it there if you fancy and then choose a calming colour for the icon.

Posted
and if you type it into the start screen it pops up just fine. Pin it there if you fancy and then choose a calming colour for the icon.

 

I have to say it is irritating that the search function separates things in to categories - yeah, it's only one more click to see if what I'm searching for is in the "settings" tab, but incrementally everything takes far longer than it should in W8. There's also the problem that some things inevitably have the same name - typing 'update' for instance can bring all manor of carp up and unless you recognise the icon for the software you want to update, you're stuffed. Simply adding the software/app name to results would solve that problem.

 

I understand this is one of the things MS have "fixed" in 8.1; all search results are shown in one place.

Posted (edited)

Oddly, despite having used it since launch at home, rather than getting used to the changes I'm actually starting to find Windows 8 increasing frustrating to use the more time I spend working with it!

 

I can see where Microsoft is going with trying to combine the metro touch UI and the Windows7 desktop interface but as it stands just now the whole thing feels like a half finished mess that isn't particularly suited to either tablets or laptops/desktops.

 

There's simply no logic to the way the UI and OS is structured anymore.

Edited by flyinghaggis
Posted

I can see where they were going with Metro - on a tablet it works pretty well. But not on a desktop. The world is full of desktops and they will be around for some time yet. Even with a touchscreen desktop the metro UI will give you RSI stretching across to use it!

 

Why MS didn't do two versions of W8 (tablet and desktop/laptop) I'll never know. Apple succeeded by selling iOS and OSX which work well on the devices they are designed for.

Posted
Why MS didn't do two versions of W8 (tablet and desktop/laptop) I'll never know.

 

They did it because they knew they had a failing mobile phone operating system as well and the only way they could actually get people to write apps for it was to move their entire ecosystem over at the same time.

 

To be fair, it kind of worked. But desktop users are the ones suffering.

Posted
An extra step , Windows 7, Vista, XP, 2000, NT 4 would all take me to the desktop without having to press a key!

 

I've taken the learning plunge and gone Mac instead, Microsoft have lost the plot. Windows 8, Windows Mobile 8, Xbox One, all wrong wrong wrong.

 

This is what makes me laugh, people are willing to learn to use a mac but complain because they have to learn to use Windows 8. Is it really because Microsoft isn't a cool company?

Posted
They did it because they knew they had a failing mobile phone operating system as well and the only way they could actually get people to write apps for it was to move their entire ecosystem over at the same time.

 

To be fair, it kind of worked. But desktop users are the ones suffering.

 

 

it depends what you call a failing mobile os. It may be small numbers still but it's growing quicker than anything else out there. So it's not all doom and gloom.

 

I presume Microsoft are finally getting there act together with the three screens thing.

Posted
I can see where they were going with Metro - on a tablet it works pretty well. But not on a desktop. The world is full of desktops and they will be around for some time yet. Even with a touchscreen desktop the metro UI will give you RSI stretching across to use it!

 

Why MS didn't do two versions of W8 (tablet and desktop/laptop) I'll never know. Apple succeeded by selling iOS and OSX which work well on the devices they are designed for.

 

Have you ever used a touch screen laptop/desktop? I used a desktop one for a couple of weeks and actually found it pretty good. You don't use the touch screen exclusively, but in combination with the keyboard/mouse. So the RSI stuff isn't an issue. In my testing i thought it worked pretty well. Back to my normal desktop now and i keep touching the screen! lol

 

With every release of windows we seem to have a year of people hating it until the hardware catches up with it, in this case with different form factors.

Posted (edited)
This is what makes me laugh, people are willing to learn to use a mac but complain because they have to learn to use Windows 8.

 

+1 exactly

Edited by cogrady84

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...