Essentially after a few opinions here, looking to upgrada a number of servers and weighing up the possible options.
We are part virtualized, but only with a few lower impact servers and locally stored on one hp proliant. As part of the wider picture i want to virtualize the rest of the servers, including exchange, sims, sharepoint, sql etc.
Initially 've been looking at things like dell powervaults m3200i which seem to be quite well received but not exactly the cheapest units. I would want to maximise the protection so dual controllers, multiple nics and so on and therefore don't want to save money by getting something that is not up to scratch and future proof.
I'm budget conscious and really wouldn't want to spending over 15-20k all in including the hosts (if possbile!!!).
This is where my second thought comes in of getting higher spec hosts with more local storage, losing the san and then maybe just get a new storage server for file shares. We don't have masses of need for file storage space, current needs are no more than 1tb.
Other than the failover abilities that a san would bring, is there any real need to get a san and nost just store the virtual machines locally?