AyatollahPies

Your signature suggests you have a vested interest.

No it wouldn't help in all cases, but it would still give you an upper hand over not having any camera in your car, in a lot of accidents.

The general rule of thumb is that if a person crashes into the rear of you, they were too close to you and it would be classed as their fault. If you have a camera that is pointing forward, it would still record the driving conditions in front of you which you could still use as evidence that you did no wrong.

I'm sure it's completely legitimate, but I can't help but refrain from visiting a site called dogcamsport, whilst at work. It makes me think of Stan Collymore not playing Football. ;-)

Looking to get this myself. Yes, it's expensive, but if it proves you had no involvement in causing an accident, then it pretty much pays for its self within a year or two. No more 50:50 insurance decisions where neither party can prove they weren't at fault.

Interesting. I've had more issues with encryption on Windows 7 machines than XP.

You lucky man. Was it XP or Win7?

I've played around with this and personally, I'd encrypt them afterwards.

Nothing on earth will come between white van man, a bacon butty and a copy of the sun.

AMD is your cheap and cheerful friend for Video Encoding.

Bet Webber is mightily annoyed. "Keep the distance" Bloomin' team orders!

Here's hoping for a spot of rain and an entertaining race. Oh and ABV (Anyone but Vettel, as much as I admire him)

They have some great sports staff. They didn't have anything to do with phone hacking. Anyway, since when did integrity pay the bills? :-)

Killing a newspaper and making hundreds of back office staff redundant is not going to protect Murdoch or Brooks. I think there are an awful lot of Skeletons about to fall out wardrobes. I do find it amusing that the Daily Mail has the headline "The paper that died of Shame". lol

Then you must get yourself down to a SIMS conference to see Phil in his Linen suit.

Reading the readers comments, it seems that even the most staunch Mail fan thought the headline went too far. I wonder if the poor girls parents or the school can force an apology from them.

It is a disgrace of a headline, but I'm always amused by the amount of folk that hate the Mail, yet seem to read it. ;-)

Genuinely sad about this, though at 83 and with the Alzheimers it hasn't come as a surprise. One of the few shows that I bought the entire box set on DVD. I shall watch this afternoons episode on ITV3 at 14:15 with a beer to toast the best Detective in the world. Hope Jack Klugman holds on for a bit longer. Can't have Quincy leaving us too. One more thing......

Ripbot

Ah, but did you have everyone's favourite resource hogging Anti-Virus running in the background?

Boldorcks! Steve Balmer must be an avid Edugeek reader. We've been busted!

Rock on Tommy! Ta chuck.

What is the battery life like?

Yeah, let's keep pushing the almighty "cloud". Dropbox security fubar infuriates customers ? The Register

You have summed up exactly why the reputation system on this site is beyond a joke. Me no likey what you say = Neg rep Me likey what you say = Thanks That isn't what it's for. This thread isn't even I.T related.