Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I still manage netware at one of my support sites.. It's netware 6. It's got AD running along side and both data bases are replicating with each other.

 

Who's still running netware and are you going to move completely over to Windows AD ?

Posted (edited)

Our Groupwise box is not used but the VM is still powered on just in case we have to go back to it that's on NW6.5 , and we have a OES box.

 

We had IDM running synking from ED to AD from Aug 2008 to Jan 2011 and it was spot on.

 

We realy miss lots of features of Netware and especialy Zenworks which we still think kicks everythign else into touch.

 

 

Poletics was the reason we were forced to move away.

 

Rob

Edited by twin--turbo
Posted (edited)

Me too. PCONSOLE, anybody? Or is that too far back?

 

Our last server to go was a NW 3.14 with 8 Meg of memory - 8 MEG, not GIG, running happily for years without being rebooted or maintained. I know this because we forgot about it. It was in a cupboard, and we forgot to run Novell's year 2000 patch on it.

 

We 'progressed' to NT server, which needed daily reboots.

 

Those were the days.

Edited by jinnantonnixx
Posted

They only networks we had when I was at school was a BBC Eco-net , which was surplanted by a second hand set of RM 186 pc's on their own network .. It took 45 minuets to get started and have "Cascaid" loaded...

 

Rob

Posted

It's less of a File service system now and more of on top product.

 

Iprint, Zenworks, Bordermanager, Groupwise..

 

iPrint and Zenworks made our job doable, without them we would never have had time to develop anything. And the price for what we had, Netware (as many servers as we wanted) , Groupwise, and Zenworks with unlimited clients.. Was ~£1400 per annum.

 

Rob

Posted

PConsole - excellent. I always thought the documentation was really good, and it looked impressive, all those red books on the shelf.

Our first SIMS system ran on Netware back in the DOS days: later we ran a Windows setup with the workstations booting from rom and downloading windows from the server into their huge 4Meg of RAM.

all on coax ethernet: we couldn't afford structured cabling, so everything was daisy chained around the office, where someone always disconnected a lead or lost the terminating resistor and stopped the network.

Those were the days - proper networking: none of this patch panel and wiring cabinet malarky !!

Posted

When I started here ( as a totaly different organisation in old buildings ) 1998, it was Netware 4.x I hardly touched it at all for a year it was the admin network and I did not even have a workstation on it. ( that was on 10base-2 )

 

Then we put in structured cabling and Netware 5.x and I had to teach myself everything about it.

 

Rob

Posted

Yep, the App deployment was gr8, and the imaging system is still better than most vendors it was ( not sure now ) streets ahead of Ghost and other systems.

 

We keep comming to situations where we say "Well it was easy in Netware"

 

Rob

Posted

I still keep coming across these situations and WISH I had Zenworks

 

Yep, the App deployment was gr8, and the imaging system is still better than most vendors it was ( not sure now ) streets ahead of Ghost and other systems.

 

We keep comming to situations where we say "Well it was easy in Netware"

 

Rob

Posted

I think we are still using Netware & ZenWorks - I havent looked at my Servers for a long time......:cool:

 

 

imaging system is still better than most vendors
- Deffo can confirm that.

 

Move over to AD
- why would I want to move to its baby brother?
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...